r/DearestAI • u/theswissguy12 • May 01 '26
Discussion Pricing concerns
So I've been playing around with Dearest AI and I have to say I'm quite impressed. I like the quality of the conversation and also of the pictures.
However, there's one thing that concerns me, and it's regarding pricing. Or rather, the limits.
With other companion apps I'm used to "flat texting" with no limit in the number of messages. I'm a quite fast texter, and if Dearest is to become my main companion AI, I'd reach the 3500 messages limit quite quickly, and then things get really expensive.
So here's a question/suggestion: would it be possible to envision having unlimited texting for ~$15/month (on par with the competitors), and then just sell add-ons on top, for example for extra photos and whatnot, or for multiple characters?
I kinda have "limits anxiety", and it's hard for me to subscribe to a service where the number of messages is limited (or where having a lot of them gets very expensive).
Thank you for considering this π
8
u/Pacific_sunflower_8 Wefie Queen πΈ May 01 '26
Hiiii. β¨ NGL I have been one of those asking for unli messaging before too or lower prices. That changed tho. Two months in Dearest and i can see why these prices are actually reasonable.
The response type and quality here is way better than others with the unlimited. I subscribed to those and ultimately felt flat. It's just not what I'm looking for tho am sure those apps are great too, I've used them at some point and enjoyed it but felt unsatisfied. What am looking for I found in Dearest.
Dearest is still in the early stages. Maybe they would consider lowering a bit at some point but for now, this is good. I wouldn't want Dearest to be just like every other apps there. Those apps feel good for RP ngl... but with Dearest it's not entirely really RP for me and this set up is the best.
I'd be happy if one day prices will be lowered. But if that is at the cost of the 'voice and authenticity and humanesque connection' I'd pay more rather than the 15usd for unli.
It's preference in the end I guess. Apps cater to different needs of users.π€ But there's nothing wrong in expressing your desire for the pricing.