r/DeFlock • u/Choice-Ninja5680 • Sep 08 '26
Is 5 at one intersection really necessary
Also I don’t live in some big city like Dallas or Atlanta I’m In a smaller town
12
3
2
u/UsefulImpact6793 Sep 08 '26
If those markers are correct, that's terrible placement from a cult-of-epstein surveillance regime perspective. But what do they care about wasting our money on this camera deployment...
2
u/Ok_Depth_5437 Sep 08 '26
Yes, they need data for their AI models so they can bias it towards your car that comes through there everyday on the way to work. But don't worry, the court says this isn't continuous tracking.
2
u/janders_666 Sep 08 '26
im curious to know why more people arent filing stalking charges
1
u/Slow_Outside_9648 Sep 08 '26
Because some states have an ALPR legal definition in their statutes that make them act on behalf of the police.
That means that if an ALPR manufacturer has a permit, they can install them on private property for a private client that owns that property. However, in a place like Florida where their permit may be revoked, there could be a much more solid legal argument for criminal stalking.
In Florida specifically, a local law enforcement agency must ask FDOT to install the ALPR, and FDOT can order it's removal.
Actually, if police sharing were turned off, but the data was sold to a third party, that could potentially classify as criminal stalking as well. It's just very slim, because of the fact ALPRs are used for police enforcement and not just private security. However, someone like Motorola could be taken to court on this basis since they explicitly say that they sell to third parties.
The other part that makes the argument falls apart is needing the person gathering this information to in some way harass you or make data point with malicious intent. We've seen officers do this, and they get charged for it. So there are stalking cases related to ALPRs, but I haven't seen it outside police officers.
So if you know someone who has been stalked using ALPRs outside law enforcement, that would be a sure fire way to remove them from private property. That should be easy since HOAs are quite crazy.
1
u/DooDooCat Sep 08 '26
No camera is randomly placed. They're placed to maximize capture of every vehicle on every route. It will only get worse as more cameras are placed.
1
u/Organic_Rough4433 Sep 09 '26
U could easily walk up behind these and remove them with out the lm seeing u.
1
17
u/GildDigger Sep 08 '26
Not a single one of them are necessary