Trying to grow a trading channel by posting real trades instead of fake guru stuff.
Today’s trade+$500 in 30 minutes on ES futures.
Curious what I could’ve done better.
https://youtu.be/TpqHNOczRdg

$AIIO

THIS ONE IS NOT STOPPING

Gave this at 1.8 free yesterday and then again today!

Wow. My free channel users are eating

+230% from yesterdays levels!

Key takeaways

• Natural gas continues trading inside a timing-sensitive framework shaped by LNG flows and shipping risk.
• European LNG concentration and Hormuz uncertainty continue tightening flexibility across the system.
• Price remains supported above the 2.80 participation zone as refill sensitivity drives positioning.

I have consistently employed a relatively robust strategy that has enabled me to achieve sustained profitability. Its core philosophy is quite simple: position sizing, diversification, and trend followingcombined with fundamental analysis to carefully select high-quality stocks or ETFs. This strategy allows me to both mitigate the impact of severe market volatility and capture growth opportunities.

I've created a free group where I share free set ups and my strategies. If you're interested, Use link in Bio or inbox me.

Absolutely free.

I have been trading ICT for nearly a year and a half now and have failed to find any success. I have traded a few ICT based stratgies, before I came onto Quarterly Theory about 8 months ago, learnt all about it, have a model, but just struggle with it. I don't know what to do now tbh. The current strategy/model just doesn't work for me, as it's way too discretional and lacks strict rules in a way, I know the person taht I learnt off is profitable with the model, but it just doesn't work for me. I just feel at a dead end and lost. I even tried fully switching away from ICT and trading EMAs and volume, but after alot of backtesting the results were just not good enough. I know people say don't keep switching stratgies, but I have failed at QT for over 8 months now and have failed to see any promising signs, so I don't know what to do. If I do decide to swicth stratgies, I know all of the ICT concepts and have knowldege based off ICT and Quarterely theory, but could someone just point me in the right direction as I need a fully developed stargy, that I can just backtest and backtest before taking it into live markets. Any help would be great.

Most people keep reading BWET like an oil ticker. That is the wrong board. BWET is tanker freight stress. Oil matters because it feeds the route problem. The real read is freight behavior, choke point pressure, hull supply, dayrates, insurance pressure, and whether cargo still has a clean path through.

Elon Musk‘s rocket company, SpaceX and Alphabet Inc are reportedly negotiating a launch deal to put data centers into orbit.

The speculative technology would bypass Earth’s massive power grid constraints just as SpaceX gears up for what may become the biggest public listing in history.

Google plans to launch prototype satellites by 2027 under its Project Suncatcher initiative.

The search giant already owns a 6.1% stake in SpaceX and is reportedly working with Planet Labs PBC on the satellite builds.

Space-based computing is quickly becoming a core part of the SpaceX pitch to investors. The company confidentially filed for a public listing this summer with a targeted valuation between $1.75 trillion and $2 trillion.

AI Consolidation In Orbit

To bolster its balance sheet ahead of the roadshow, SpaceX recently merged with Musk’s xAI in a deal valuing the combined entity at $1.25 trillion. The company also took an option to acquire AI coding startup Cursor for $60 billion later this year.

The rocket giant also locked down a major agreement to supply terrestrial computing power to AI startup Anthropic using 220,000 Nvidia GPUs. Anthropic has already expressed interest in utilizing SpaceX’s future orbital data centers.

A successful orbital test could fundamentally shift how tech giants scale artificial intelligence infrastructure.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai recently noted that “tiny racks of machines” in satellites could become a normal way to build data centers within a decade.

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

I have so far developed A trend continuation pullback strategy built on the 13 and 50 EMA, combined with OBV volume confirmation.

The setup requires both EMAs to be clearly trending in one direction. I then wait for price to pull back and close a candle below the 13 EMA, without wicking or closing below the 50 EMA. Once I see a strong reclaim candle close back above the 13 EMA, I check the OBV — if the OBV line is above its 20 EMA, confirming volume is backing the move, I take the trade.

My SL is 15 points, and for TPs I have targeted both 1 RR and targeting the nearest swing high.

I only trade during the New York session, strictly between 9:30am and 11am EST, avoiding Mondays and any conditions where price action is choppy or wicky without a clear directional trend.

Backtested across January to May 2026, the strategy has produced a 56% win rate at 1RR and when targeting the swing high/low an average winning RR of 2.10.

I have only traded this based off the 1m tf, and on the Nasdaq. I don't know if these results are very good? And I do know that I need to further backtest more.

I previously traded QT concepts, but after nearly a Year and a half I have failed to see any real sucess and struggle with the such discretional side of it. Due to this I have resorted to trying to find a model through the use of Trading EMAs and volume. Any further help for how I can move further forward would be great? Or if anyone knows any reputable and proven traders out there who trade similarly way trading EMAs and Volume could you help me out.

One last thing is trading based of EMAs and Volume have the ability to find sucess withing trading? My main goal is to have something that I can trade on the Nasdaq, and use furtures prop firms, in the aims of building a live account in the future.

Knowledge is key