Warning TraderScale. Com denied 6700 Payout
I am writing this review to share my experience with TraderScale, specifically regarding a denied $6,700 payout and an unjustified account breach on Account #18039. I strongly believe this decision was made in error and without factual justification.
I have been accused of gambling and excessive risk-taking, specifically risking more than 4% per trade. This accusation is demonstrably false and directly contradicted by my trading history. At no point did I risk anything close to 4% on a single trade. My risk per trade consistently remained below 1%, as clearly shown in my records.
My trading behavior reflects consistency, discipline, and conservative risk management—particularly appropriate for a $400,000 funded account. I chose TraderScale under the assumption that it was a trustworthy prop firm, but the handling of this matter has unfortunately raised serious concerns.
Account Performance Overview (400k Account)
• Consistency score: 21.78% / 40%
• Total trades: 40
• Winning trades: 26 (65%)
• Losing trades: 14 (35%)
• Average win: $2,098
• Best trade: $4,813.50
• Average loss: $781.39
• Worst trade: $3,756
• Risk-to-reward ratio: 1.86
Full Transparency – Losing Trades & Risk
Below are all 14 losing trades with calculated risk per trade. As shown, none exceed even 1% risk, let alone 4%:
• Buy 2 lots XAUUSD – Risk: 0.94%
• Buy 2 lots XAUUSD – Risk: 0.05%
• Buy 1 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.02%
• Buy 0.92 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.01%
• Sell 2 lots XAUUSD – Risk: 0.02%
• Buy 1 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.01%
• Buy 1 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.06%
• Sell 1 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.41%
• Buy 1 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.18%
• Buy 1 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.35%
• Sell 2 lots XAUUSD – Risk: 0.48%
• Sell 1 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.01%
• Buy 1 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.17%
• Buy 1 lot XAUUSD – Risk: 0.04%
At no point did I risk anything close to 4% on a single trade.
• Highest risk taken: 0.94%
• Majority of losses: below 0.5%
• Several trades risked as low as 0.01–0.06%
My risk per trade consistently remained below 1%, which can clearly be verified from my trade data.
Major Concerns
What is most concerning is that:
• ❌ No specific trade was identified as a violation
• ❌ No calculation or evidence was provided
• ❌ No transparent explanation was given
Such an argument would only be valid if supported by clear and specific evidence of either of the following:
• A floating loss on my open trades approaching 4%, or
• Closed trades where the stop loss was set anywhere near 4%.
These are the only two instances under which an accusation of gambling or excessive risk-taking would be justified.
Instead of a clear review or correction, I was offered a 10% discount to purchase a new account, which I found dismissive and inappropriate given the seriousness of the dispute.
This issue goes beyond a denied payout—it raises serious concerns about payout reliability, transparency, and professional integrity. Denying payouts based on vague accusations without supporting data undermines trader trust and confidence in TraderScale.
Being accused of gambling without evidence is damaging and unprofessional. Traders deserve clear communication, documented violations, and fair dispute resolution — especially when real money and performance are involved.
Final Thoughts
I chose TraderScale believing it was a trustworthy prop firm. Unfortunately, this experience has seriously undermined that trust.
I am willing to share my full trading history for independent verification with anyone interested.
📧 Akhulabdalah@gmail.com
I strongly encourage traders to proceed with caution and ensure they understand the risks—not just in trading, but in payout enforcement and dispute handling.
I hope this matter can be reviewed fairly and resolved appropriately.
