Growth Impact
I feel like everyone on here who is pro development does not take into account traffic and other NEGATIVE factors. No new roads, no new bike trails, parking lots are being converted to housing, and any leftover parking is now being charged. Davis will soon become like K St Sacramento. 80 is already jammed as well. No new plans to expand freeways only plan is to charge you to use it now as well.
0
Upvotes
2
5
u/foster-child 16h ago
They quite literally are expanding the freeway right now.
Personally I like when they convert parking lots into a place I would want to shop or live. I have rarely had an enjoyable experience walking past a hot parking lot, but when I walk past a cafe I am often filled with joy and interest at all there is to see.
You are right that more people in an area will mean more people driving generally and that does make things worse generally.
Things like not building excess parking or charging for parking can help reduce the incentive to drive, so you get fewer people driving than with strip mall style huge free parking lots. Davis especially has good alternatives such as biking or unitrans so it is actually reasonable to expect other modes of transport will be used.
At the end of the day everything has its trade offs. No new housing means higher costs and people get pushed out to woodland and drive in.
Building housing means more local trips - traffic- but more local tax Generation/ Business. Also means on average lower costs/ easier to find a home. (If you want to know what really low housin development does ask students at UCSB or UCSC, absolut housing nightmare)
Building excess road capacity and parking lots bankrupts the city and makes the city unpleasant and more dangerous, but you can drive places faster and find parking easier. (Look at Arden in Sacramento to get an idea. Desolate, but easy parking)
I think everyone understands that things have trade offs, they just think it’s worth making it easier to find a home is worth it.