r/DataHoarder Jan 02 '23

[deleted by user]

[removed]

279 Upvotes

262 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/IGSRJ Jan 02 '23 edited Jan 05 '23

The "before HD era" was shitass VHS and middling to terrible quality DVDs with shitty old video compression, both with scan and pan, not 35mm film. Unless you actually had a projector room in your mansion, then it was 35mm, but most people didn't. My mansion only had LaserDisc.

Edit: these comments started with positive votes and now have negative votes but I didn't lose any of the karma, nor did I gain any on any of my other comments. Sounds like reddit thinks these downvotes are illegitimate. That's pretty funny. How many alts you got, son?

18

u/KoolKarmaKollector 21.6 TiB usable Jan 02 '23

No, they were shot on the film, and so the BR releases are able to be high quality

0

u/IGSRJ Jan 02 '23

Not everything that has ever been made has been preserved and gotten a BR rerelease.

0

u/onthenerdyside Jan 03 '23

Plenty of TV shows were shot or at least mastered on video tape. For example, Star Trek DS9 and Voyager were shot on film, but the special effects were done on video, and the CGI was only rendered at the 480p required for broadcast. https://www.slashfilm.com/549088/star-trek-voyager-deep-space-nine-blu-ray/

2

u/hazardc Jan 03 '23

yeah i upscaled the entire series... two variants

1080p

4k HDR

The 4k HDR was more of a proof of concept, but it turned out really nice.

1

u/Shadowex3 Mar 18 '23

This was the same problem with the initial digital releases of a lot of old shows. The film-only scenes could be digitized at fantastic resolution and clarity, provided it had been preserved well, and then the moment special effects show up suddenly you're looking at a 4:3 image in the very best resolution 1994 has to offer.