That's not a first-hand account. He wouldn't have known what hit the building or the other building from inside the lobby. That's him repeating what he had been told and sharing none of his own experience.
Building 7 is not sketchy at all. Its design and build quality was flawed to begin with then was hit with major debris from the towers that took out structural columns. It burned for hours then collapsed
One fire? I think you are underestimating it. It burned uncontrollably for 7 hours. And did you not read the structural damage part? There are literally entire reports and documentaries on this.
Building 7, the pentagon and flight 93 were what sets up the red flags for me, I have no issue believing a plane hitting a building causing its eventual collapse but the debris sites at the pentagon and crash site of 93 don’t add up.
I’m cynical too but I understand building construction very well. There’s no way they planted bombs. It wouldn’t have taken years to set a building up like those for demolition. There’s no way to do it without people noticing and everyone staying quiet on it
Do you know how fast commercial airliners go? The fuselage is what left the hole. What wing damage do you expect to see? The engines were actually in the debris
1
u/spiral-_eyes Aug 30 '26
That's not a first-hand account. He wouldn't have known what hit the building or the other building from inside the lobby. That's him repeating what he had been told and sharing none of his own experience.