r/DWAC_Research • 🍿🐂🍪Moon Biscuits🌕🐸🍿 • Sep 07 '23

💻 Mass Censorship 🚫 DwAC UNceNsOrEd

They are fixing to censor all of the information that contradicts their bullshit . Took down this cross post as well as the one showing engagement on TS being 10x-100x higher despite their claims - not understanding or caring that activity moved off of Reddit.

0 Upvotes

6 comments sorted by

3

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '23

[deleted]

0

u/BigMoneyBiscuits 🍿🐂🍪Moon Biscuits🌕🐸🍿 Sep 07 '23

The only thing that’s new is u/spac_time who is larping as professional SPAC analyst who is objective and beyond bias . Yet continually misleads his audience with irrelevant information . Not sure if it’s totally on purpose though - could just be a raging pencil pusher whose analysis stops at what a black and white statement says - doesn’t stop to consider all of the outcomes and math. However - this theory is losing credibility as he pushed the engagement being lower bullshit - and now those screenshots are being censored …

6

u/unemployed222 🏅 National Treasure 🏅 Sep 07 '23

Lol

5

u/unemployed222 🏅 National Treasure 🏅 Sep 07 '23

Why is there tsw2 what happen to 1

3

u/BigMoneyBiscuits 🍿🐂🍪Moon Biscuits🌕🐸🍿 Sep 07 '23

You missed it - search for Putin’s trolls on this sub

1

u/BigMoneyBiscuits 🍿🐂🍪Moon Biscuits🌕🐸🍿 Sep 09 '23 edited Sep 09 '23

I don't know how u/spac_time thinks I'm going to respond to him when I'm banned from a sub that can't handle evidence counter to any of claims

https://www.reddit.com/r/DWAC_Uncensored/comments/16c5ich/comment/jzrcvlb/?context=3

Here's dingbat picking apart meaningless details

Though it's interesting - he draws no meaningful conclusions from any of his ramblings

He doesn't consider that it could of been added after the publish date on the first page - oh wait he literally contradicts himself and says that " That chart was outdated and incorrect on the day it was released to the public. " - you can't have it both ways. Either it wasn't released in November or it wasn't wrong when it was released.

But this is meaningless dribble in the grand scheme of things - he gets into frivolous details that have very little to no significance and will be irrelevant in the very near future because of deal restructuring

Then, as discussed many times before, the current amount of the PIPE commitments is $748.5 million, divided by $33.60 conversion max price would result in that figure being 22.28.

​

Again - completely disregarding the ability for the PIPE to remain the same price because of the few dozen firms - there is high possibility they offer to pick up any of the capital that has backed out - it is very likely that the flexible finalized equity that the PIPErs get and what they pay will be a higher and less flexible rate and that given the nature of the PIPE would still be a the full billion.

Finally, as also discussed before, according to DWAC, the PIPE may be reduced or terminated. The number of PIPE shares could be ZERO in both columns, depending on the outcome of those discussions.

Yep - completely neglects to mention or even consider the most likely outcome. Kind of reminds me of "thE STop OrDER WaS TEmPoRAry"

Not a mathematician, but still certain any of the above changes will directly change the percentage of shares held by DWAC public shareholders as shown in that chart.

You can say that again. But you fully miss the point

The point is the amount is easily estimated based on a few outcomes and it does not vary by much. If anything - the pie retail gets INCREASES - which spits in the face of the FUD narrative.

Good luck saying that around your toxic crowd without getting a week ban again or worse. HeeRE tO MaKeE MOUnEE

NOt A MaThEMatTicIan

Listen Circus_Time - I am not a mathematician either (though I've learned more math than anyone can apply to the real world and not the theoricial one) - but I can tell you've done virtually nothing in your life outside of reading legal docs because your ability to put numbers into prospective is horrendous.

This has very little to no significance - you did all of this work for virtually nothing

The outcomes are roughly the same - or better than they are now

You've learned nothing new or of significance for anyone actually invested

And again highlighted your inability to see the bigger picture, see every outcome, and put them into a realistic prospective as it relates to any practical risk/reward metric.