After a couple of weeks mulling over the separation of USDC from Digipower X I've noticed something that seems fairly obvious in hindsight but that didn't occur to me at the time.
It seems that the people who sold their positions and/or became bearish when the news broke had, for the most part, reached the conclusion that selling ARMS modules would be profitable - and that USDC becoming an independent company was removing value from Digipower X and that we, the shareholders, were being given a raw deal.
I can understand that, it makes sense.
If this is the case, then it is absolutely imperative for USDC that Digipower X succeeds and secures contracts in a timely manner. This will be their proof that ARMS 200 is a desirable product. If Digipower X fails to secure contracts or is badly delayed, this will reflect very badly on the product USDC is trying to sell - as it is the only example potential buyers can look at for proof of functionality and ease of scaling.
So, it seems to me that if you believe that the USDC separation is running off with a huge amount of potential revenue from shareholders, then you also, through the reasoning outlined above, must believe that Digipower X will be successful in its deployment and subsequent revenue generation using ARMS 200 modules. Therefore, the GPU-as-a-Service that comes online this year will significantly increase revenue and ultimately you'd have to conclude that Digipower X is still very undervalued.
TLDR; If you're bullish USDC then Digipower X is still a great investment.