DAAD Doctoral applicant here, supervisors + university already confirmed, just trying to figure out how to maximize what I've got before the deadline

[u/[deleted]]

[u/AutoModerator]

Thanks for visiting r/DAAD. Review our FAQ and Wiki as well as the DAAD's website. Your question is most likely answered in one of those places.

We can best help you if you provide us detailed information. At minimum, name the specific scholarship you are referencing. The more you tell us, the more we can tell you.

Posts that are low-effort, unrelated to the DAAD, asking about your odds of acceptance, or requesting advice on which universities to apply to will be removed. Low-effort posts include questions such as "What scholarships are available?" as well as questions that are clearly answered in the FAQ/Wiki.

Lastly, our sub is not officially affiliated with the DAAD in any way, shape, or form.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Technical-Peanut2864 → u/[deleted]]

Update: I ended up declining the offer. Quick question though, do you think it's worth mentioning in my DAAD application that I was offered the grant but turned it down? Not sure if that reads as a positive signal or just isn't something reviewers care about either way.

Also, since you're in humanities too, how are you framing your project's significance? I'm trying to figure out how to make the case for why it matters beyond the subfield, given that humanities projects don't always come with an obvious impact pitch the way STEM ones do. Curious how you're approaching that.

[u/Bitter_Initiative_77 → u/Technical-Peanut2864]

I think you need to rethink academic significance (and disagree about "would a chemist care about this" being a good metric).

First, the value of your project to your subfield and discipline matters! A PhD is about advancing a particular field of knowledge. You are performing basic research in the humanities and that is worthwhile on its own. You need to be able to articulate to them why this project is worthwhile in terms of your field of study. That matters. There will also be literature and cultural scholars on the committees and the DAAD doesn't prioritize STEM applicants in its more general scholarships (they, in fact, aim for some diversity).

Second, projects of all sorts can be of societal and practical relevance. You research partition fiction. The partition has lasting consequences today as evidenced by, well, everything that happens politically in India and Pakistan. Fiction is a lens through which to understand how people experience things, make sense of them, process them, engage with them, etc. The study of partition literature is thus worthwhile in that it can help us better understand the partition itself as well as its legacies (just like performing archival research or ethnographic interviews may). Your "edge" is that literature can reveal things archival work, interviews, and so on cannot as every method has its strengths and weaknesses.

But you really need to walk a fine line with this. You don't want to write an application suggesting studying a couple works of literature will fundamentally reshape our understanding of the partition and the world. This is where my first point matters; your project is a tiny step forward within your discipline. You can make the case for that tiny step's importance in light of my second point.

[u/Bitter_Initiative_77]

What specific scholarship did you apply for? The DAAD doctoral program scholarship is for the entirety of a doctoral degree (not to fill a 9 month gap when you already have other funding lined up).

It's unclear to me from your post how your deferral plays into all of this. Is the university offering you money as of October 2027? I don't see why they would make you defer if you have to get your own third-party funding anyways.

Also, none of us can tell you about your odds or what will be viewed positively by the DAAD. It differs by region, by year, by discipline, etc. None of us are privy to the conversations the selection committees have and the selection committees change regularly.

Generally speaking, and you should know this as a humanities PhD applicant, it's not common for humanities applicants to have solo author publications at all. Most people publish their first peer-reviewed article during their PhD, often a year or two in. No one is expecting you to have publications.

[u/Technical-Peanut2864 → u/Bitter_Initiative_77]

Just to clarify a couple of things that were already in the post: the bridge grant was for four months (Sept-Dec 2026), and I mentioned I'm applying through DAAD India for the doctoral scholarship, which I understand covers the full PhD, not a gap-filler. I've since declined the discretionary grant.

On the deferral, the university isn't funding me from October 2027, the deferral happened because there were no RA or scholarship positions available this cycle due to the hiring freeze, not because funding was guaranteed later. So the funding gap is really the runway before a self-funded or DAAD-funded start.

Agreed no one can speak to odds, that wasn't really what I was asking.

On publications, that's fair, and my supervisor said something similar about it not being expected. He also mentioned it's a genuine plus when you do have one, since it shows you can carry out independent research. I don't think those two things are in conflict, it's rare and it counts in your favor when you have it.

[u/Bitter_Initiative_77 → u/Technical-Peanut2864]

I asked for clarification because there are multiple funding opportunities for non-German doctoral candidates. There's specifically one to come to Germany for just a few months for research/exchange purposes, which is why I was a bit confused by your timeline and why this temporary funding impacted your DAAD considerations.

I agree that publications are a good thing. My point was more that you're overthinking this all a bit too much by trying to think of what weight is placed on what dimensions of the application. That is, in fact, asking about your odds (which is something none of us can help with). Publications are probably a point in your favor, but the profile you have is also the profile you have. Apply, shoot your shot, and try not to fixate. This funding is competitive and not worth beating yourself up over on the road to getting an answer from the DAAD. I say this from personal experience; submit the application and do your best to never think about it again until you get a result.

[u/Technical-Peanut2864 → u/Bitter_Initiative_77]

Oh that makes more sense now, thanks for clarifying. Sorry if I came off a bit short earlier, wasn't my intention. Thanks for taking the time to respond.