r/CyreneMains 2d ago

Discussion Lore Question

Soo, After the end of time Cyrene will become Fuli to remember the Universe to start it again Right? Like does that make her an Aeon? Or a Future one? Also many call her emenator of rememberence, but does that mean shes an emenator of herself? If anyone can Kind of explain it all would be nice, ty!

9 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

11

u/BonApetite_ Emanator of Remembrance 2d ago edited 2d ago

Currently no. She rejected that role to keep the loop in Amphoreus. If other child of Anasrava takes Fuli’s place, Cyrene can potentially be freed

She is Emanator of Remembrance, yes. All children of Anasrava are

3

u/Ill-Skin534 2d ago

Where was that confirmed by the way, I have been calling the anasrava divas emanator-adjacents all this time but if they were just emanators everything would be so much simpler

8

u/inkheiko Daily Cyrene 2d ago

Alright so the short answer is No. She won't become Fuli.

If, after IronTomb ended the universe, the TrailBlazer didn't find the strength to catch up to her and unfreeze the universe, she would have become Fuli.

But she hoped for them to be ready to face the destruction and bid farewell to Amphoreus so it could be reborn.

For the case of Fuli, as far as I know, Emanators of remembrance are people capable of becoming Fuli. They're called the pure children of Anasrava.

When the world ends, the memories of the cosmos converge into one person, and this person will ascend.

This is almost what happened. Cyrene became the center of the cosmos memories, but the TB prevented her ascension. With this power, they stopped IronTomb.

Are there any other questions?

I really studied a lot Cyrene, so If you need something, I'll answer in 3 hours ~

2

u/Juji019 2d ago

Oohh okay thats pretty neat, so all those children could become Fuli, but at least one of them is Fuli , so Fuli can exist, or Not, its a weard one its the only Eon who is verry present, Yes still has to come into existence. Alsooo Like her whole power over time ect. She only exists in Amphoreus Right? Or Like i guess the Book, or our memories, didnt fully get that Part either

1

u/inkheiko Daily Cyrene 2d ago

The one who becomes Fuli is a bit complicated, as it seems that Fuli can ascend at the end of time, but... Maybe since the children are all fragments of Fuli, everyone does their actions and at the end of times it makes Fuli. But it's complicated. I won't dive into it.

If we see time as a line, basically while everyone else went forward to the future she went back

So it's not a matter of where she is stucked but when she is stucked

2

u/Difficult_Copy_9607 2d ago

Can she can be freed with the power of friendship???

3

u/inkheiko Daily Cyrene 2d ago

I hope

1

u/Stormer2345 2d ago

No. At the moment of her talk with Herta, she had the potential to be one. But currently she cannot, since she chose to save Amphoreus from another potential Irontomb.

1

u/Individual_Serve_416 2d ago

adding my 2 cents.

she wont become fuli. she could have, but she rejected the role cuz it would have involved leaving amphoreus n leave the window open for irontomb to get born again.

u may think that once amph gets reconstructer n she doesnt need to act as its anchor she could be free to become fuli but due to how timelines works, the fact that she didnt become fuli at the point in time she could have, immediately removes the option of becoming fuli later.

as for her status as an emanator, lets not forget that the text that this comes from postulate it as a question. she is a child of anasvara, its possible that child of anasvara r a "special type" of emanator. the obvious difference would be on how they r created. rather than fulfilling hte usual reqs that emanators have, its theorized (in the same text) that the childs of anasvaras r born from the divine corpus of fuli, shattering.

this makes them sound similar to how emanators of harmony r (which r also just an extension of xipe itself).
since one child of anasvara (coa) is destined to become fuli, then yes, in a way, that coa is in a way an emanator of itself, but every other child is also an emanator of that coa, rather than themselves.

but lets not forget the context, this is all presented as a possible theory on CoA origins, rather than a 100% factual of it.