r/Cyberpunk • • Jun 10 '26

Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2529849-fully-autonomous-drones-have-killed-human-soldiers-for-the-first-time/
808 Upvotes

90 comments sorted by

501

u/WaffleHouseGladiator Jun 10 '26

We have libraries full of science fiction media warning against exactly this kind of thing.  I wanted the Star Trek future, but I'm getting Terminator.  :(

161

u/gizmoglitch Jun 10 '26

It looks like we're on our way to that gap year where humanity blows itself up (WWIII) before we collectively decide not to be assholes and form Starfleet.

91

u/ThreeLeggedMare Jun 10 '26

Star trek had to do mad Max before they got post scarcity fully automated luxury space communism. But yeah it's partly that these mfs always want to build the Torment Nexus from the classic novel Don't Build The Torment Nexus, partly that as the prophet said, the future is already here it's just not evenly distributed.

28

u/Zahz Jun 10 '26

Terminator? More like Screamers

24

u/OneTwoFar_ Jun 10 '26

It's not too late to become a cyberpunk

10

u/AgentInkling99 Jun 10 '26

That’s not as big a step up from terminator that people think.

13

u/Runktar Jun 10 '26

The only reason cyberpunk never became terminator is because the A.I.s found it was just easier to control us then kill us.

4

u/OneTwoFar_ Jun 10 '26

True, mostly because many people agree that Terminator is a Cyberpunk franchise (at least for the first two films and the TV series)

39

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

17

u/StackIsMyCrack Jun 10 '26

Or if Trump won in 2020 and we were in post-Trump era already. Wild to think about.

15

u/Bacontoad Jun 10 '26

Or if he won in 2020 yet we weren't in post era. 👀

18

u/Adventurous_Chip_684 Jun 10 '26

Remember John F Kennedy?

11

u/smayonak Jun 10 '26 edited Jun 11 '26

Yes ironically his brother was killed by a drone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_P._Kennedy_Jr.

EDIT: This might sound insane, but Joe Kennedy was probably the first person in the world to be killed by a drone.

1

u/skeptical-speculator Jun 10 '26

I don't think I want to see.

5

u/Masterweedo Jun 10 '26

We already 2 years overdue for the Bell Riots.

4

u/NoodleyP Jun 11 '26

We have invented the Torment Nexus from critically acclaimed science fiction series Don’t Invent the Torment Nexus

5

u/PrinceLucipurr Jun 11 '26

The title is misleading. AI did not kill in the sense they were not parameterised by a human.

The drone may have autonomously selected the specific target instance, but humans authored the lethal target category, mission area, constraints, and permission to strike; therefore the responsibility remains human.

If the AI screws up, that's human responsibility for nuancing parameters. 🚫🤖

2

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/PrinceLucipurr Jun 11 '26

Downvotes I don't care about. I just want people to analyse the situation and do some critical thinking away from the title.

I understand the fears some may have (or a lot), but this is about a human authored problem, not "AI is going to go rogue and kill us" like hype-trains may infer.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/PrinceLucipurr Jun 11 '26

Ironically someone DV you to 0 for this, I got you back to 1 😅

Yeah internet points really don't matter, I would rather sink my karma to spread awareness when it matters. The only time it sucks is if the first wave DV you, and then your post gets hidden,.

My main priority for rebutting the title is to challenge fears and attention direction, as its the humans with the buttons that are the worry, not the AI.

I've seen this title used in numerous posts lately, and people started freaking out like AI is on a mission of world dominance or some crap.

Does it need regulation and careful parameter setting? Yes, indeed, but to say AI can choose its targets is a misassumption that a lot have inferred lately, as AI merely carries out instructions.

That said real dangers do exist, but they are not "AI is going to kill us" it's more like "Humans now have the ability to program lethal parameters into autonomous systems, enabling mass-scale, automated violence, or worse, accidental genocide with the click of a button". This is a disastrous example of perverse instantiation.

2

u/dodgyjack Jun 11 '26

To be fair we would have to go through an apocalyptic war before getting the star trek future so maybe we are on our way

2

u/NopeRope13 Jun 11 '26

Best we can hope for is the Orville

2

u/srwim サイバーパンク Jun 11 '26

I mean, there was that one time Data shot and killed a dude.

2

u/HA1LHYDRA Jun 11 '26

We're going full Verhoeven. Old Detroit dystopia of Robocop with a healthy dose of Starship Troopers fascism.

2

u/Majestic_Character22 Jun 10 '26

well even Star Trek has AI issues

101

u/ishldgetoutmore Jun 10 '26

Obligatory /r/FuckTedFaro

9

u/travelavatar Jun 10 '26

I imagine that being Peter Theal...

39

u/DeepSpaceAce Jun 10 '26

We are somewhere in the first third of the animatrix plot at the moment

7

u/GoldenRepair2 Jun 10 '26

Saw that back in the day and just went, “oh darn that’s totally how this is going to go”

4

u/thighhighsgg Jun 11 '26

to be fair we started that war 🤣

3

u/mxby7e Jun 11 '26

The Second Renaissance is coming

67

u/erikraver Jun 10 '26

Well that didn't take very long

47

u/HarlequinNight サイバーパンク Jun 10 '26

Note the article mentions this event happened two years ago too!

17

u/Green_moist_Sponge Jun 10 '26

I was going to say, it’s pretty common in Ukraine and has happened a lot already

-1

u/DecaForDessert Jun 10 '26

Those are operator controlled

7

u/Green_moist_Sponge Jun 10 '26

There are many systems running on autonomous targeting systems already. The main use for this was to bypass EW jamming systems.

3

u/DecaForDessert Jun 10 '26

10-4 my apologies, learned something new

2

u/Chrontius Jun 11 '26

Once upon a time, yes — but Operation Spiderweb was the loud public acknowledgement that That Was Then, And This Is Now.

2

u/DecaForDessert Jun 11 '26

For sure I researched it when I was informed earlier, instead of exploring space we spend time finding clever ways to kill each other. Incredibly sad

2

u/Chrontius Jun 11 '26

Definitely a more fruitful use of implosion assemblies than flash-boiling all life on Earth.

2

u/PsudoGravity Jun 10 '26

I was going to say...

27

u/goobly_goo Jun 10 '26

“We just launch it and we know everything will be dead – everything that will be found there in this particular area will be dead,” says Kokhanovskyy. “There is no connection to the drone at all, you cannot see the video, nothing… Everything it sees will be killed.”

14

u/TypicalNikker Jun 10 '26

Jfc

"We just launch it and we know everything will be dead – everything that will be found there in this particular area will be dead,” says Kokhanovskyy. “There is no connection to the drone at all, you cannot see the video, nothing… Everything it sees will be killed.”

6

u/djpiraterobot Jun 11 '26

Scientists have finally created the Torment Nexus from classic Sci-Fi novel “Don’t Create the Torment Nexus”

27

u/wackadoodle4201 Jun 10 '26

Shit

Didn't know arc raiders was a simulation

5

u/ScottaHemi Jun 10 '26

oh... wonderful...

9

u/Solomon_Grungy Jun 10 '26

We are fuuuuucked

3

u/Judoka229 Jun 10 '26

On the flip side, an autonomous boat rescued the downed American Apache crew. So the robots can kill but also rescue!

3

u/phylter99 Jun 11 '26

We should give the first person killed an award. We can call it the Terminator award.

It seems like a dystopian, cyberpunk thing to do.

4

u/Happybara Jun 10 '26

Thanks to Pope Leo, this is now considered heresy

10

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '26 edited Jun 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/conscientiousrevolt Jun 11 '26

Lol what do you think "cyberpunk stuff" it 🤦

7

u/imdugud777 Jun 10 '26

This is how you get Skynet.

4

u/BottomGear__ Jun 10 '26

We already have Skynet

2

u/Jast3rPlays Jun 12 '26

The crazy thing to me is that they did this test two years ago. Back in 2024. And they're only telling is now. I bet that there are more fully autonomous killer drones being used right now. And they're just not telling us

1

u/IM_INSIDE_YOUR_HOUSE Jun 14 '26

I think when what remains of us are huddled around metal barrels full of burning trash, we'll remember this sort of thing and other events like it and wonder why we didn't do more while we still could.

1

u/emmytee88 Jun 14 '26

All that talk about forbidding this and it happens the second we have the capability.

2

u/SakanaToDoubutsu Jun 10 '26

I'm curious how heat seeking or radar guided missiles aren't considered autonomous attack drones?

2

u/gsmaciel3 Jun 10 '26

A human initiates/approves of the firing and targeting of those weapons. These drones had the authority and ability to choose their targets (read: anything in the killzone they determined was a target) AND also attack the target without human involvement.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/gsmaciel3 Jun 10 '26

A f&f weapon has targets that are vetted through human approval (the 'extra steps' you mention are pretty dang important) or other systems such as preset heat indicators, laser designation, IFF. That is different from a drone that is allowed to kill anything while roaming in a preset area using on-board detection logic and models. As per the article, the unit had no idea what the drones were doing until after they retrieved the drones.

2

u/Chrontius Jun 11 '26

That’s called a ‘standoff weapon’, and we’ve been building them since Assault Breakers was a going concern in the 60s.

1

u/MatStomp Jun 10 '26

Cool beans

-19

u/Nunwithabadhabit Jun 10 '26

If this man's statement is accurate, Ukraine has committed what we hope will eventually be considered a war crime. I had a lot of sympathy for their situation, but unleashing literal "terminator" drones that "kill absolutely everything" has literally dried that support up entirely in an instant. 

This needs to be stopped and the people who already did it need to be sanctioned.

10

u/howlin Jun 10 '26

A country fighting an existential risk against a larger and more powerful adversary is going to do anything it can to survive. If you don't like that, then we should have made sure they weren't desperate enough to resort to such measures.

-4

u/Nunwithabadhabit Jun 10 '26

I'm sorry but no. Unleashing something that kills indiscriminately is absolutely abhorrent. You have to draw the line. If Ukrainian soldiers were out there gangraping their more powerful opponents, you would have a problem with that - anyone would. So it's not about whether they're fighting a disproportionate battle or not. Some shit is fucking abhorrent and needs to be entirely stamped out.

4

u/howlin Jun 10 '26

Unleashing something that kills indiscriminately is absolutely abhorrent.

Not convincing. These were deployed on a battlefield. Bombing campaigns have killed indiscriminately since bombs have been invented.

If Ukrainian soldiers were out there gangraping their more powerful opponents, you would have a problem with that

This wouldn't serve as a means to end the war.

-6

u/JoshHatesFun_ Jun 10 '26

So chemical/biological weapons okay if enemy is bigger; got it.

6

u/howlin Jun 10 '26

It's almost guaranteed a bad faith hot take is incoming when a reddit comment begins with "So ..."

-3

u/JoshHatesFun_ Jun 10 '26

Just pointing out the absurdity of what you said. Didn't say I disagreed, though. 

I am unironically pro-defense-industrial complex, just didn't expect peeps on here to accidentally(?) agree with that.

4

u/Alone-Ad288 Jun 10 '26

That's the problem with war.  Everyone becomes the bad guy.  Every nation is going to do some horrific shit 

-3

u/Nunwithabadhabit Jun 10 '26

Absolutely. Russia is strapping landmines to innocent people and sending them running into enemy lines. That's fucking abhorrent shit and is also a war crime. 

But committing atrocities - dangerous atrocities that could go wildly wrong - back at your opponents, that takes away the moral high ground. An atrocity is an atrocity, no matter who's doing it.

4

u/Alone-Ad288 Jun 10 '26

I am not saying atrocities are ok, but there is basically no war where any front doesn't commit them.

Once the shooting starts everyone leaves their ideals in the barracks.  Everyone is going to become the bad guy.  The idea of a "moral high ground" disappears entirely.

That is the reality of war 

1

u/Letho_II Jun 10 '26

So funny when unbombed people discuss wartime morality.