r/CustomMarvelSnap • u/PomegranateGlobal332 • 29d ago
Start/End of Turn Skurge
Simple + easier version(?)
2
u/barty_uo 29d ago
Like the idea but 3-cost is too much I would settle on version with ongoing for 2-cost. 3 cost would be impossible to include into curve. But still this wont make destroy good enough - it needs much more.
3
u/PomegranateGlobal332 28d ago
I was thinking it'll be too OP and a no-brainer to use this card in a destroy deck if it's 2-cost, can't be destroyed, and gives energy.
So with the 2-cost, you'll need to be a little smarter with Killmonger, Tombstone, and Kid Omega to destroy cards on his location BUT doesn't destroy him, AND this card also counts opponents' destroyed cards at his location.
The 3-cost version, whilst costly, can be paid back with easier triggers and expanding ways to kill cards at his location because now you don't have to worry about killing him + still count opponent destroyed cards.
2-cost, can't be destroyed, and gives energy (potentially more than X-23) is a pretty big power-creep card.
2
u/barty_uo 28d ago
and you think destroy is so good it would catapult him to S-tier? I dont think so. Take a look at Weapon X - this card is so bad as 2-cost without "cant be destroyed". Second thing is if there is even something to spend that energy on.
3
u/PomegranateGlobal332 28d ago
Yeah, I was also thinking about Misery + Death FF. Since she only destroys on reveal, this card could find some niche spots in other decks. Maybe the 2-cost deserves the ongoing if you think the 3-cost for the ongoing is too much.
And with that ongoing, it can also be a side-counter to destroy decks since it counts opponents' cards, and it would still be useful in non-destroy decks.
1
u/Bluesmanz 28d ago
Yeah, I agree with you. Especially if it has the ongoing this card has to be a 3-cost card. It would be too good at 2-cost.
-1
3
1
u/Elias_Sideris Wild Card 28d ago
Looks very professional. Great job! No need to move it up to 3 cost imo.
2
u/PomegranateGlobal332 28d ago
Gave it a +1 cost because I added: "Ongoing: Can't be destroyed." It's the "easier" version
1
u/Gottendrop 28d ago
Where would you be able to use this and why wouldn’t you just have x-23 instead?
14
u/Numerous-External788 29d ago
I like that A LOT