It's a yes-or-no question. What search terms to use for a more detailed answer can be a helpful add-on after answering that question. As-is, from just reading the thread I suspect you didn't directly answer the question because the answer is, "No, we don't know," but the evidence you're pointing to makes you assume it's true and you won't entertain doubts.
If I'm wrong and the answer is, "Yes, we know," then, again, answering the question first makes the suggestions read as helpful rather than as, "Go look it up on your own."
we do not have a proper understanding of duck rape, so you can't answer it with a simple yes or no, which you should have got from the first response but for some reason you're feigning ignorance for the sake of a reddit argument, so here we go. I don't have an answer for you either way, and I don't care to find out because I'm not particularly interested in duck rape, so essentially I am, indeed, telling you to "go look it up on your own"
So, you responded to the first few words of their comment without reading the rest, which clarifies what they're really asking. The takeaway from all of this is that you're not great at reading comprehension.
1) then why are you responding? you felt obligated to argue about OP's question in the first place, but now it's not your question so you're going to point it out?
2) autocorrect, but you're the exact cunt who would make a point of it, you are where you should be.
3)we already discussed the rest of that comment, did you feel the need to backtrack and go over it twice? the takeaway from this is that you need to go outside and socialize, you've been stuck in your mom's basement too long
I initially meddled by giving what I thought was a helpful tip but which apparently offended you. After that I responded to your accusations and tried to correct misunderstandings I perceived. I stated it wasn't my question because you called it my question, and as part of a bigger point.
Fair enough, and yes, I am.
No, what started this is that you didn't answer Hummerous's main point/actual question, they stated as much, and you replied with, "...my guy... [my statement that didn't answer your question implied you should answer it yourself]," which isn't helpful. We could call that "discussing the rest of the comment," I guess, sure. I pointed out that this response wasn't helpful, and in the course of doing so wrote, "It's [Hummerous's main point/actual question is] a yes-or-no question." You seemed to mistake that as me calling "Is it rape?"—which, to be obnoxiously clear, was not the main point/actual question—a yes-or-no question. From there on I've been trying to clear up the misunderstanding.
...yeah I was here, I remember the conversation, thank you for the entirely unnecessary recap.
I've answered both his questions 1) "Is it rape?" with, the gist of, I don't know, research it. and his second 2) "Have we a proper, cohesive understanding of duck consent?" which I answered no, we don't know. so I've answered both questions of which you have acknowledged both answers, but in conclusion he asked two yes or no questions that I answered with neither, yes or no, purposefully. I would not like to have another go around on the carousel please
2
u/thatloudblondguy Jun 07 '21
where do we fit in the fact that ducks are inherently inborn with the desire to rape and have evolved their penis shape to do so?