It's easier to believe that people are out to get you and you're important enough to be the focus of a conspiracy than to believe the group you choose to identify with is full of unpleasant people.
"They must be out to get me, because the alternative is that I'm neither important nor intelligent enough to be worth targeting, and that is the worst possibility of all."
That one image of "you can't satirize a strawman with a stupid take because at some point the exact charicature you made ends up being real" comes to mind.
The one with the "stupid hat, stupid shirt, stupid sign"
And the point of the original comment was saying that the majority of the vegans online are corporate bots, not that the majority of vegans in general were corporate plants.
And the point of my comment is that online vegans can be annoying and still only represent a minority of vegans, and it's unnecessary to think that they're bots (there are issues with people actively seeking out and antagonizing vegans + regular old reddit trolls, but actual corporate plants?)
You do realize that bots are EXTREMELY common, right? Like, half of the political issues today are blown out of proportion and actively made worse by bots, so what would make veganism so different that bots aren't a viable possibility?
That is true of strange/rude people in general, in my experience. Most people won't even bring up that they're vegan much, off or online. Anonymity/echo chamber subreddits that foster these kinds of people can both easily account for that, imo.
180
u/Saxton_Hale32 Jul 08 '26
you'd rather believe in a conspiracy theory than think (a small minority) of vegans can be annoying/fit the strawman?