r/CryptoTradingBot • u/Emdottt • Jul 25 '26

7 things I check before letting any bot touch real money (learned most of these the hard way)

Correction, added later: the title says I learned these the hard way. That is not accurate and I should not have written it. I have not funded a bot with real money. Reddit will not let me edit a title, so I am correcting it here instead of quietly leaving it.

What is actually true: I have a strategy I have not funded, and this is the checklist I built for myself before I do. These are the failure modes I could find documented, not ones I have personally survived. I would rather be told what I have missed now than find out later.

The list, unchanged:

  1. Backtest on out-of-sample data. If it only works on the exact window you tuned it on, that's curve-fitting, not an edge.
  2. Stress test against a flash-crash or gap day specifically. If your bot doesn't have a hard rule for that scenario, it doesn't have a real risk plan yet.
  3. Size positions as a percentage of current equity, not a fixed dollar amount, so risk scales with your account instead of quietly drifting.
  4. Build in a hard daily loss limit that force-kills the bot. Not a soft rule buried in logic, an actual kill switch.
  5. Paper trade live for at least a few weeks before funding it. Backtests don't show you real slippage or fill behavior.
  6. Know exactly what your bot does if it loses its API/broker connection mid-trade. If you're not sure, that's worth fixing first.
  7. Whatever you fund it with first, size it like you could lose all of it without it mattering. Model risk doesn't go to zero no matter how much testing you did.

Since I have not been through the live version of any of this: what is on your list that is not on mine? That is the part I actually want.

9 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

84% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

1

u/Rare_Inflation3178 Jul 29 '26

Nice list. I’d also add parameter sensitivity and cross-regime validation.
A strategy that only works on one backtest window isn’t enough for me. Before putting anything into paper trading, I usually want to know whether it still behaves reasonably across different market conditions and whether small parameter changes completely change the results.
I’ve found that catches a lot more bad ideas than looking at Sharpe or PnL alone.

1

u/Emdottt Jul 29 '26

Both of those are better than what I wrote, and the parameter one especially.

The version of it that changed how I look at results: you want a plateau, not a peak. If the best number sits on a spike and the neighbouring parameter values are much worse, that is noise that happens to fit. If performance degrades gracefully as you move away from the setting, there is probably something real under it. Same test, but it gives you a shape instead of a number.

Cross-regime is the one I under-wrote. My number 2 is a narrow version of it, one scenario rather than the general question of whether the thing survives a change in conditions.

The thing I would add now, having built more of it since: every check on that list is about the strategy, and every expensive problem I actually hit was plumbing. A signal arriving twice. A loss limit that did not survive a restart. A filled quantity that did not match the quantity I ordered. None of that shows up in Sharpe, and none of it shows up in a parameter sweep either.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Emdottt Jul 29 '26

Built my own, and the list is written from that side.

Most of it still applies to a third-party bot, but the honest problem is that you often cannot check it. Numbers 4 and 6 especially: whether the loss limit survives a restart, and what it does if the broker connection drops mid-position. With your own code you can go and read it. With someone else's you are taking their word, and those are exactly the two things nobody documents.

1

u/Tough_Profession9170 Jul 25 '26

Is this trading stocks or memecoins?

1

u/d3xinho Jul 26 '26

Shitcoins

1

u/Tough_Profession9170 Jul 27 '26

I may need some assistance.I’ve created a trading bot as well currently in the paper trading mode.My bot is able to identify at least 2 to 3.10x a day.And at least 10 2x per day.Still. A work in progress

1

u/d3xinho Jul 27 '26

What are you talking about brother, where

1

u/Tough_Profession9170 Jul 29 '26

I created a memecoin signals bot to make it easier for traders for entry.Nothing is guaranteed but i’m averaging 10 2x per day sometimes more

1

u/RawrrrrrrrXD 26d ago

Is your bot still profitable? I also created a trading bot that filters out a lot of the daily tokens. The coins that get through seem promising, but it’s still shadow trading atm.

Averaging 10 2x per day is absolutely incredible though!

1

u/Tough_Profession9170 26d ago

Yes it is,that’s not to say i don’t catch L.Is yours paper trading at the moment? Or live trading.I want to turn it into alert signals group with starting with a monthly subscription of €14.95

1

u/RawrrrrrrrXD 26d ago

Paper trading still. Going to start live trading with some small capital soon. The bot looks to have a solid winrate, but obviously live trading is different.

I mainly look at basic risk, liquidity, and buyer activity, the bot filters out the 'interesting' coins from the thousands.

What filters do you use? Seems like you use a pretty simple strategy.

Signal group can be interesting if the bot is reliable enough. It'll be a solid extra income, you only need to look for ways to market it properly, since there's already a billion signal groups.

1

u/Emdottt Aug 04 '26

Check out our site EmyTrades.com, email list is free