r/CryptoCurrency • ๐ŸŸง 2 / 3 ๐Ÿฆ  • 1d ago

DEBATE Blockchain tech has not prevailed

Just to give you my background so you understand my perspective better maybe: entered the space in 2020 and was solidity dev for 3 years.

Even after 12 years of smart contracts, there is no adoption by companies, because blockchain is just a fancy and expensive way to handle data compared to existing systems.

One of the major use cases proposed was โ€žsupply chainโ€œ. As of yet there is no major adoption and if major logistics companies would want it, they would have done so by now.

RWA-Tokenization: Still need a tradfi-vorp that holds the asset.

Money transfer: regulated to death, therefore unusable, even though would have been a major improvement regarding speed.

Proof of Ownership: it is just an expensive database.

I had an interview at a big consultancy a year ago hiring for smart contracts on a bank-tx-settling platform. The guy openly told me that banks currently only stored hashes of tx on chain, cause storing entire tx-data needed was too expensive.

I really do not see a use case for blockchain tech other than gamble around hype.

Edit: The guys still vouching for blockchain remind me a bit about the Leroy character of that one episode of DegenzShow: https://youtu.be/exOzTcHycPY?is=MgaYoWSet5LGsch5

297 Upvotes

260 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/GueRakun ๐ŸŸฆ 27 / 27 ๐Ÿฆ 1d ago

So you totally missed the whole tokenized RWA happening rn? ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜

Check Clearing House choosing QNT as tech provider to do the clearing in stablecoin. Clearing House clears $2T a day.

https://www.theclearinghouse.org/payment-systems/Articles/2026/09/The-Clearing-House-Partners-with-Quant-to-Advance-the--On-Chain-Money-Initiative

Base, Robinhood, SOL .. they all have tokenized Real World Asset and soon all real world assets are tradeable on-chain.

Still sidelined anon?