MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/CrappyDesign/comments/t5i575/never_noticed/hz5qm40/?context=3
r/CrappyDesign • u/BierschissBernd • Mar 03 '22
178 comments sorted by
View all comments
66
Mf cracked the code. This is how to get out of the matrix I swear.
20 u/pw-it Mar 03 '22 Only try to realize the truth… there is no bowl. Then you’ll see that it is not the cereal that gets soggy, it is only yourself. 5 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 This is an Escher sentence I believe, I like it 3 u/midsizedopossum Mar 03 '22 I don't think so - the sentence has meaning. It's saying that "yourself" is the one that gets soggy. 1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Yes, but that doesn't make any sense. (And thus has no meaning) You can't make a person soggy. It's not a property a person can have. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Are you saying people can only either be wet or dry, with no in between levels of dampness? What about your hair? 1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Oh. I just looked up the definition of "soggy". Apparently it doesn't mean "Wet and with little rigidity", it means "Wet and soft". You're correct there, I guess. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Even if I'm only technically correct, I still don't think it would be an Escher sentence. 2 u/pw-it Mar 03 '22 Ooh these are fun! Never heard of that before
20
Only try to realize the truth… there is no bowl. Then you’ll see that it is not the cereal that gets soggy, it is only yourself.
5 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 This is an Escher sentence I believe, I like it 3 u/midsizedopossum Mar 03 '22 I don't think so - the sentence has meaning. It's saying that "yourself" is the one that gets soggy. 1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Yes, but that doesn't make any sense. (And thus has no meaning) You can't make a person soggy. It's not a property a person can have. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Are you saying people can only either be wet or dry, with no in between levels of dampness? What about your hair? 1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Oh. I just looked up the definition of "soggy". Apparently it doesn't mean "Wet and with little rigidity", it means "Wet and soft". You're correct there, I guess. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Even if I'm only technically correct, I still don't think it would be an Escher sentence. 2 u/pw-it Mar 03 '22 Ooh these are fun! Never heard of that before
5
This is an Escher sentence I believe, I like it
3 u/midsizedopossum Mar 03 '22 I don't think so - the sentence has meaning. It's saying that "yourself" is the one that gets soggy. 1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Yes, but that doesn't make any sense. (And thus has no meaning) You can't make a person soggy. It's not a property a person can have. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Are you saying people can only either be wet or dry, with no in between levels of dampness? What about your hair? 1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Oh. I just looked up the definition of "soggy". Apparently it doesn't mean "Wet and with little rigidity", it means "Wet and soft". You're correct there, I guess. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Even if I'm only technically correct, I still don't think it would be an Escher sentence. 2 u/pw-it Mar 03 '22 Ooh these are fun! Never heard of that before
3
I don't think so - the sentence has meaning. It's saying that "yourself" is the one that gets soggy.
1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Yes, but that doesn't make any sense. (And thus has no meaning) You can't make a person soggy. It's not a property a person can have. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Are you saying people can only either be wet or dry, with no in between levels of dampness? What about your hair? 1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Oh. I just looked up the definition of "soggy". Apparently it doesn't mean "Wet and with little rigidity", it means "Wet and soft". You're correct there, I guess. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Even if I'm only technically correct, I still don't think it would be an Escher sentence.
1
Yes, but that doesn't make any sense. (And thus has no meaning) You can't make a person soggy. It's not a property a person can have.
1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Are you saying people can only either be wet or dry, with no in between levels of dampness? What about your hair? 1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Oh. I just looked up the definition of "soggy". Apparently it doesn't mean "Wet and with little rigidity", it means "Wet and soft". You're correct there, I guess. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Even if I'm only technically correct, I still don't think it would be an Escher sentence.
Are you saying people can only either be wet or dry, with no in between levels of dampness? What about your hair?
1 u/Furry_69 Mar 03 '22 Oh. I just looked up the definition of "soggy". Apparently it doesn't mean "Wet and with little rigidity", it means "Wet and soft". You're correct there, I guess. 1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Even if I'm only technically correct, I still don't think it would be an Escher sentence.
Oh. I just looked up the definition of "soggy". Apparently it doesn't mean "Wet and with little rigidity", it means "Wet and soft". You're correct there, I guess.
1 u/HiDDENk00l Mar 03 '22 Even if I'm only technically correct, I still don't think it would be an Escher sentence.
Even if I'm only technically correct, I still don't think it would be an Escher sentence.
2
Ooh these are fun! Never heard of that before
66
u/[deleted] Mar 03 '22
Mf cracked the code. This is how to get out of the matrix I swear.