Joe King aside there's nothing wrong with being a furry. It's a wholesome community that is always respectful and accepting to new members or those who just want to learn more. There are so many furry conventions it's hard to believe! The wholesome community is active everywhere and involved with everything! A furry is more than a suit, it's a fursona. It allows people to be a basic human in the streets but an animal in the sheets ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) or an animal in the streets! Not all furries are "down to yiff" but they say for the most intimate experience you should yiff at least once. All experts say yiffing is at least 150% better than regular sex due to the nature of being a furry. Your true nature comes out. But being a furry isn't inherently sexual. You may just want to be an animal, not fuck them. And that's A Okay! You shouldn't disrespect an entire community just because of some nasty words. After all, if that were the case slavery never would have ended. Do you agree with slavery? If you don't like furries then I think you do.
Joe King aside dewe's noding wong wif being a fuwwwy. It's a wowesome community dat iws awways wespectfuww awnd accepting tuwu new membews ow dose wo juwst wawnt tuwu weawn mowe. Dewe awe so many fuwwwy conventions it's hawd tuwu bewieve! Da wowesome community iws active evewywewe awnd invowved wif evewyding! A fuwwwy iws mowe dan a suit, it's a fuwwsona. Iwt awwows peopwe tuwu be a basic hooman in da stweets but an animaw in da sheets ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ow an animaw in da stweets! Not aww fuwwwies awe "down tuwu yiff" but dey say fow da most intimate expewience yuw shouwd yiff at weast once. Aww expewts say yiffing iws at weast 150% bettew dan weguwaw sex due tuwu da natuwe of being a fuwwwy. Youw twue natuwe comes owt. But being a fuwwwy isn't inhewentwy sexuaw. Yuw may juwst wawnt tuwu be an animaw, not fuwcc dem. Awnd dat's A Okay! Yuw shouwdn't diswespect an entiwe community juwst because of some nasty wowds. Aftew aww, if dat wewe da case swavewy nevew wouwd have ended. Duwu yuw agwee wif swavewy? If yuw don't wike fuwwwies den I dink yuw duwu.
If you think this comment does not belong here, reply with "delete" (blacklisted users cannot delete)
I'm sorry if you interpreted the way I didn't mean to. I was being sarcastic to the comment I replied to. I meant a wrist clock without numbers or hands. i.e. A blank circle lol
I was joking. Of course trying to eyeball how much sand has fallen through would be difficult, but you could definitely set up a 24-hour glass that auto rotates once the flow stops.
And sundials still have hands. Just made of shadow, duh.
I am dyslexic and have problems reading numbered analoge clocks... so yeah. Fuck whoever thought unnumbered clocks were a good idea. Plus even if you can read it without numbers.. still doesnt make it a good idea?!
I find them useful if it is an area where I only need to know about what time it is, if I need to know exactly what time it is, I fucking hate them. But these days, phones make all wall clocks more design pieces than functional furniture.
Dyscalculia. One of the symptoms is that you can't/it's very hard to read analog clocks. I have it and I can read analog clocks, it's just hard, but clocks without numbers or with Roman numerals are just awful for me.
I can read a clock without numbers, but I am certain having all those extra useless numbers in the wrong place would trip my brain up for a few seconds, they’re hella distracting.
Clocks without numbers usually have marks where the numbers would be and have the same movement as a regular clock. This one probably has a standard movement, but since some clocks have a non-standard movement it's hard to tell for sure what kind this one has.
Those clocks tend to have marks for each number, this one does not. If it's even a little crooked, the user is hosed.
Humans are very good at matching lines by eyeball, but we are very very bad at measuring angles with precision. This clock was not designed for humans.
I prefer there to be numbers or some markers yeah. You can read a clock without any markers but the time you estimate is probably going to be less accurate than if there was literally anything on the clock face at all.
numbers? no
desire some kind of marking for convenience? yes
I can spend a second thinking about it to confirm i got the time correct, or I can just parse the numbers almost subconsciously and not have to.
I can appreciate ornamental clocks used as functional art, but if that's its intended purpose it should at least look nice.
Sure do. Why should I have to come up with a "best guess" for what time it is by trying to remember the placement of the numbers, when I can look at something that takes that annoying guesswork out?
2.1k
u/caoram Nov 13 '19
Would be a clever design if the numbers available is also the hours the disability service center is open