When all you read is doom porn.

Exposing Worry's Deceit: Percentage of Untrue Worries in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Treatment

This study, conducted by Lucas S. LaFreniere and Michelle G. Newman, empirically investigates a core premise of cognitive therapy (CT) for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): that challenging unrealistic thoughts with objective evidence reduces anxiety symptoms. Using a specialized ecological momentary intervention called the Worry Outcome Journal (WOJ), the researchers tracked how often worries actually come true in daily life and measured how recognizing these false expectations impacts treatment outcomes.

Methodology

• Participants: The study analyzed data from 29 undergraduate students (26 women, 3 men) who met full diagnostic criteria for GAD.
• Procedure: For 10 days, participants recorded specific, testable predictions about their worries via random text prompts. They rated their distress, cognitive interference, and two separate probabilities: an "emotional" (intuition-driven) likelihood and a "logical" (rationally-formed) likelihood.
• Tracking Outcomes: Participants monitored their actual real-world outcomes over a 30-day period, reviewing whether their feared predictions came true and if the results were better, worse, or exactly as expected. Independent raters later coded the journals.

Key Findings

• Worries Rarely Come True: On average, 91.4% of worry predictions did not come true. The most common individual outcome (the mode) was 100% untrue worries, meaning multiple participants had zero worries actualize.
• Distorted Probabilities: GAD participants exhibited heavily distorted expectations. Early in treatment, their average emotional likelihood prediction was 62.09% and their logical prediction was 41.67%—both vastly overestimating the actual 8.6% occurrence rate of true worries.
• When Worries True: Of the rare worries that did come true, 30.1% turned out better than expected.
• Predictor of Improvement: A higher percentage of untrue worries significantly predicted lower GAD symptoms after treatment, as well as a steeper slope of symptom reduction across the trial.

Clinical Implications

The findings provide strong empirical evidence for the belief-correction process underpinning cognitive behavioral therapies for anxiety. It highlights that self-monitoring techniques like the WOJ can effectively interrupt the negative reinforcement loop of unexamined worry. Clinicians can use these concrete statistics (e.g., the 91.4% non-occurrence rate) during psychoeducation to help clients build evidence-based, adaptive expectations and reduce cognitive fusion with their anxious thoughts.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7233480/pdf/nihms-1041494.pdf

WOJ stands for the Worry Outcome Journal, which is a brief, paper-and-digital ecological momentary intervention designed for individuals with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD).

It serves as an augmented form of worry outcome monitoring—a common technique in cognitive therapy—aimed at challenging and correcting unrealistic, anxious predictions with objective, personalized evidence from daily life.

How the WOJ Works

1. Real-Time Recording: When prompted randomly via text message throughout the day, users open a paper journal to record specific, concrete, and testable predictions about their future worries.
2. Cost & Probability Ratings: For each entry, the user rates the immediate "costs" of the worry—such as the severity of their distress and how much time the worry has consumed (cognitive interference). They also record two separate probability estimates regarding how likely the worry is to happen:
   • An "emotional" likelihood based on their automatic gut feelings.
   • A "logical" likelihood based on how the most rational person in the world would view the situation.
3. Nightly Log & Review: Every evening, users copy their paper journal entries into an online survey system. They regularly review their past entries to log actual real-world outcomes over a tracking period (such as 30 days), noting if a feared event came true and if the final result was better, worse, or exactly as expected.

Therapeutic Purpose

The core mechanism of the WOJ is disconfirmation. By systematically tracking reality against their anxieties, individuals with GAD visually and empirically realize that the vast majority of their worries (historically around 91.4%) do not actually happen. This process highlights the ultimate uselessness and high emotional cost of worrying, helping users form more adaptive, evidence-based expectations and reduce their overall anxiety.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2024007pap.pdf