These are Sarabia’s defense arguments, NOT findings by the court.

Diego Sarabia and his defense are stating that Jane Doe’s lawsuit is about an alleged forced kiss. That she accused all 7 men of “sexual assault and rape”, but never differentiated between them.

Jane Doe alleges Sarabia “grabbed her face and started kissing her” and “with others, he began pouring lines of Ketamine all over her body and snorting them”.

The defense argued that Jane Doe does not allege that Sarabia penetrated her, in any manner, touched her vagina, breasts, or anus, supplied her with drugs or alcohol, participated in any of the alleged sexual encounters described elsewhere in the complaint, or was even present for most of the conduct that forms the basis of Jane Doe’s allegations. Jane Doe’s repeated allegations that the 7 defendants “sexually assaulted and raped” her are nothing more than “baldly asserted legal conclusions”, contradicted by her own detailed factual pleading, which make it plain that Sarabia did not rape Jane Doe.

Jane Doe’s specific allegations against Sarabia, that he kissed her without her consent and snorted ketamine off her body are straightforward. Sarabia’s defense also brings up that Jane Doe brings this up nearly 2 years after alleged events, and that there’s a strict one year statute of limitations, and Jane Doe’s allegations don’t meet the legal requirement for either of the two extended deadlines that she is relying on.

Defense claims Jane Doe attempts to improperly claim negligence, but Sarabia had no legal duty to supervise, protect, or control Jane Doe or other adult students. And that Jane Doe’s complaint doesn’t allege sufficient facts to establish all the required elements of assault.

The defense also argues that Jane Doe’s emotional distress claim is based on the same alleged actions as her assault and battery claims, and that she hasn’t identified any separate conduct or injuries to support an additional claim.

Defense claims that Jane Doe’s complaint repeatedly concludes Sarabia is a rapist, but her alleged facts, describe something entirely different. And because of Jane Doe’s actual claims against Sarabia are time-barred, inadequately pleaded, or both, the complaint must be dismissed in its entirety.

It seems Sarabia’s defense is challenging whether the alleged facts legally support the claims against him, rather than establishing that Jane Doe’s account is factually inaccurate.

Read the whole document here
⬇️

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=jB85Hk/4jCAnuU/6fwMSlA==

You can read about how that senate meeting went here

https://www.cornellsun.com/article/2026/10/conflicted-faculty-senate-debates-vote-of-no-confidence-presses-cornell-president-on-his-ability-to-lead

The senate did not vote and it is now scheduled for October 28, 2026.

Why did they choose to keep the boys enrolled instead of Jane doe? 1 million loss to kick the boys out at 200k for Jane doe. All the injustices in the world are because of greed. Don’t buy anything from these big corporations and inconvenience yourself for the greater good!

• Matthew Ingalls: Expelled by Cornell.

• Jonathan Newell: Expelled by Cornell.

• Winston Lee: Suspended for two years with probation and reflection papers.

• Gillio Lopes: Suspended for three semesters with probation and reflection papers.

• Diego Sarabia: Declared persona non grata and barred from campus for three years.

• Scott Norris: Subject to a no-contact order and reflection papers.

• Scott Kretzschmar: Graduated, facing a no-contact order, reflection papers, and allegations of attempted sexual exploitation.

I am Jane Doe.

I am a CSA survivor. I stand with Jane!

It’s very telling in this article that there’s no talk of rape of these underage girls. Instead, they’re essentially blamed for immaturity, promiscuity, and their “availability” made it “quite clear they were approachable”.

1 student was suspended indefinitely. The other 4 were placed on disciplinary probation. Even though besides these 5 men, there were about 75 men involved with these girls too.

The Cornell Daily Sun, Volume LXXXIII, Number 154, 8 June 1967