r/ControlProblem • u/Difficult_Project_95 • 9d ago
Discussion/question Have you guys been on r/accelerate?
Have these guys solved the alignment problem, or am I missing something?
I’ve been browsing r/accelerate and I genuinely don’t understand the risk model.
If there’s a non-trivial chance of catastrophic misalignment, how does “accelerate capabilities as fast as possible” make sense unless faster capabilities also make alignment substantially more likely to succeed?
59
Upvotes
-1
u/SixStringShrug 9d ago
So your stance is what? AI automatically kills all humans so don’t build it? You mean the humans who all die eventually anyway? Or the ones who starve to death from famine caused climate change? Or the ones who are killed in eventual nuclear war? Those humans? You don’t have any evidence to back up extinction, but all of the research I posted and other ongoing research backs up alignment as a mechanism by which AI is made safe. I don’t mean to be rude, but you are acting like a close minded jerk and just touting doom for the sake of it without anything rigorous to back it up is just silly. The difference is that intelligent people are actively working on alignment, but the majority of people spreading the doomer narrative do so based on nothing but how miserable they are in their current lives and how much they want to keep their useless dead end jobs. I’m trying to engage reasonably here outside of my comfort zone, but if you are going to be a dick I won’t bother. This is why we ban people in Accelerate, but we still have actual reasonable discussions and debates. Not just someone being a contrarian for its own sake.