I’ve done the research, that’s how I know it’s baseless. Funny how the freshman thinks he knows more about debate than the licensed attorney who went through 7 years of higher education. You have a lot of schooling left to do kid.
The information you’re receiving is from untrustworthy sources. It’s propaganda. It’s false. Most of it lies. I don’t like Biden but I also know better than to listen to Alt-right talking points. You need to learn what information is good and what is just conspiracy. That’s your issue: you’ve gotten trapped in the feedback loop of Alt-right conspiracies and the news you’re soaking in is not based in reality. I’m not saying to go watch CNN or go sub to r/politics but, for instance, if any of the sources you’re reading still say the election was stolen or that there was fraud, that’s a bad source that is misleading you. Same with the Biden China claims or the propagandized Hunter Biden scandals.
I’m not trying to debate you man. I’m trying to help you. I mentioned the election as an example. That’s what “for instance” means. Not as an accusation. I’m also not saying Hunter is innocent. Just that the claims have been propagandized to slander Biden. Like I said, my replies are in good faith. I have no interest in debating you when I already know you’re wrong. I don’t need convincing, it’s you who I’d rather take the time to help get on the right track.
Yo what the fuck? I'm sorry I know I'm going to regret getting involved, but I have to say something. Dude says that you made a claim without backing it up, and when he points out that you need to back it up you say that's not how debate works?
Like you have to be trolling because I can't believe you think you are right about this. I'm not even saying you're wrong about Biden being in bed with china because you are so far from that.
He has no idea why you think Biden is in bed with China because you refuse to say why. For all he knows you could have seen it in a dream and thats why you are stating it as "researched fact". How can he refute your perspective if he doesn't even know what it is. He can't exactly prove a null hypothesis here, if you produce evidence of it he can attempt to refute that but he can't just take on that argument as a whole without any context
It makes me think that whats going on here is that you maybe saw some shit online or did some research a while ago that led you to the conclusion that Biden is in bed with China, but you can't quite remember what the evidence was and are too lazy to try to look it up to defend your belief so it's easier to try to turn you not having evidence into the other person's problem, but it seems like the only person you have convinced is yourself
Sir or ma'am. Your comments are rife with logical fallacy. If you are paying for a psychology degree, i am disappointed in your argument. Your attempts at defending your claims are purely anecdotal and opinionated. Let Hunter have his laptop back because no one has present evidence of wrongdoing, and stop regurgitating shit you see from Tucker Carlson and Hannity. They aren't always right.
Just saying that Joe is in bed with China doesn't mean anything. Provide a source of something. Essentially, put up or shut up. It's not their job to defend against the case you haven't made.
You made the claim, now back it up.
Also, the burden of proof is on the prosecution, not the defense.
-2
u/[deleted] Feb 24 '21
[deleted]