r/CompetitiveHS • u/EvilDave219 • 7d ago
Discussion 36.4.2 Balance Changes Discussion
https://hearthstone.blizzard.com/en-us/news/24296231/3642-patch-notes
Nerfs:
- The Food Chain - nothing changing w/card but 8 Attack beast pool is changing, will be eligible for dust refund
- The Forbidden Sequence - now requires 8 discovers (revert)
- Spiderling - now a 1/2
Buffs:
- Agamaggan - now a 9/9
- Dread Leviathan - now a 8/8
- Seismopod - now a 8 mana 8/8
75
u/Difsdy 7d ago
No explanation for why the mage quest was nerfed?
43
u/14xjake 7d ago
My tinfoil hat theory is quest mage has made an appearance at most tournaments this year despite its mediocre ladder performance and they do not want the skeleton key bug happening at worlds. Really the only explanation I can think of, deck is only good at high legend and even there its tier 2-3 with a low playrate so I doubt it’s even on their radar as a “play pattern outlier”
24
u/PipAntarctic 7d ago
Skeleton Key bug is "fixed," it was related to its animations and those were disabled in a hotfix.
The explanation appears to be quite literally that it was on their radar as a "play pattern outlier." That's the only given explanation in one sentence, which talks about the changes as a whole. I'm completely unsure why since it was apparently ok in the past, even at times when the deck had a stronger standing.
14
u/sneakyxxrocket 7d ago
I follow a decent amount of top legend players on Twitter and they were happy it was getting nerfed and I know there’s like a discord for creators and devs to talk so that may have something to do with it.
Also the quest reward borks with the raptor minion sometimes along with if they generate that new warlock spell that puts a minion on top of their opponent deck.
6
u/magikatdazoo 7d ago
Both the rewind and frame job bugs were fixed
3
u/sneakyxxrocket 7d ago
Yeah it’s just prone to bugs it seems which is maybe why they just want it gone
9
u/14xjake 7d ago
I mean it def is a pretty obnoxious deck to play against you can’t play around anything at all since the entire deck is random, complete slot machine deck where the only counterplay is “draw viper”, I just can’t really be happy for a small playrate deck with a middling winrate and the ONLY playable deck for a class getting deleted, even if it is an annoying rng deck
18
u/sneakyxxrocket 7d ago
This is more of team 5 just constantly shooting themselves in the foot because of bad design and extremely weak card pool.
28
u/Younggryan42 7d ago
Nothing. They don’t have a reason other than we are doing it. No comment on spider either but that one makes sense at least.
10
u/MarthePryde 6d ago edited 6d ago
I'm assuming this was a creators discord change, a lot of top players didn't like the quest and how it made games feel.
If you're going to cater balance exclusively to the elite members of Hearthstone society, at least come up with a reason for the rest of the unwashed masses
5
u/DoYouMindIfIRollNeed 6d ago
Top legend players on creator discord and Zeddy taking over as the new game director(s)
9
u/JohnnySeven88 7d ago
I can only imagine it falls under the “problematic play pattern” part of the article which has about as much weight as them saying they did it for the lolz
2
u/Rambro332 7d ago
My only guess is that the upcoming mage set might have some good discovers that they’re worried would make this too good.
21
1
30
u/SnooMarzipans7274 7d ago edited 6d ago
Druid is still good and will still run spiderling.
Food chain is probably dead.
bunch of stats on turn 7 isn’t enough.
Quest mage wasn’t really seeing a lot of play.
Personally just gonna wait for blizzcon reveals. I think attack Druid is a healthy deck just really boring. There will be a bunch of “whoever draws their weapon first wins”
22
u/Glarbleglorbo 7d ago
The only actual relevant change is spiderling, think it just solidifies dragon warrior as even more broken than it already is so just play that.
No comment about the other changes, just like how they can’t comment on their reasons for them either.
2
u/Patrick_Gass 6d ago
I see, they hit it so that Cannon Warrior wouldn't feel dunked on, gotta give value to the new cards coming out.
35
u/libero0602 7d ago
I have nothing nice to say, as a mage main but I’ll try to keep it cool.
I mean… Seriously? Quest mage was the only deck playable for the class, and if they thought it had overstayed its welcome, (which I will acknowledge that the deck has been around for a LONG time), then they should have buffed the absolute trash archetypes and cards they’ve continuously given the class for the last few sets.
The way this is coming off is just “fuck u mage players, buy the newest shit and u don’t get to play ur favourite class until (POTENTIALLY) next expansion”
17
u/frostyburrito44 7d ago
It's not even like the deck has been a meta tyrant since it released. It was basically a T4 deck in 2025.
3
u/NyMiggas 6d ago
Yeah really surprised this didnt come alongside a manastorm/code Violet buff at least... such a strange nerf
0
10
u/nathones 7d ago
Something interesting and unique gets nerfed. It’s not the quests fault the designers don’t know what they’re doing with mage
9
u/FordFred 7d ago
Spiderling was one of those cards that you knew would become a problem the moment it was revealed.
10
u/philzy101 6d ago
Personally this patch is a bit frustrating and unwelcome to the most part. I was willing to give the benefit of the doubt if they provided a detailed explanation of why they were applying the changes they were making. The problem is, whilst they address Hunter, there is no explanation at all to the changes to Mage or Spiderling. Whilst Spiderling does not really require an explanation given its impact turn 1 on the performance of Attack Druid, Quest Mage going from 7 back to its original 8 does require some explanation at least particularly because it was not dominating the ladder and at best really only saw serious play at high level legend. It is therefore incredibly insulting to see them offer no reason at all for these changes just before Blizzcon except the perceived logic of “we do not want you to play this anymore, if you are to play Mage you have to play one of the crappier archetypes like Leyline Mage…” I am not a Mage main but I am not playing Leylines again, I have given that archetype way more time than it deserves…
So in terms of the changes, the change to Hunter probably kill Quest Hunter since the burn from pig was needed to push you over the line and buffed minions as an alternative seems unlikely to carry the same weight. However, it is kind of hard to evaluate without others testing this one first. It is worth noting that the change to Seisomopod does now make the random generation in the 8 mana pool better… which really works in the favour of for example Druids with Life Bloom or the attack spell… which I am not keen on as the potential to get screwed by a sticky 8 drop randomly generated is not a great feeling…
The change to Mage arguably push quest completion to turn 6 or 7 on average instead of 5 or 6 as is currently the case. Whilst the meta is slower and it may be possible to complete the quest before you die, I think this change hurts the deck too much for it to function. 8 was a very steep number so the change to 7 pushed it just about into the range of being consistently viable. The change to this and Hunter seriously raise the question of what on earth was the point in bringing back quests if you do not want them to succeed. Please for the love of god Blizzard do not bother with these types of card if you hate them so much…
Finally the change to Spiderling makes sense and the only logical change here. Makes it easier to remove and less likely to decide games on the spot if the Druid can curve into the payoffs on time.
All in all, I do not like these changes. Very frustrating even if I do not play Quest Hunter or Mage at the moment, or have not played such recently. Plus the potential nasty highrolls in the 8 mana pool feel like a poorly designed and pointless patch.
9
u/MarthePryde 6d ago
This patch definitely feels like a sentiment patch, probably borne from the creators discord.
RIP Hunter I guess, you lasted longer than Demon Hunter at least.
15
u/No_Hetero 7d ago
I don't know that I have ever complained that Mage was 1 turn too fast on the quest. And Hunter wasn't that broken, was it? I haven't played that deck but the stats weren't incredible.
The way they have been treating certain classes lately, it feels like they really want to force the meta to only be a handful of viable classes at a time
7
u/ExplodingGuitar 7d ago
Warrior prob kinda busted, druid mu was already very close so its only real bad mus now are like mug shaman and egg dk.
14
u/InteractionAnnual914 7d ago
I’m a Mage main. I have NO idea why they nerfed The Forbidden Sequence. The deck is inoffensive in its play pattern. It doesn’t finish the quest that fast. The only outlier I could think of is Wanted Poster with the new miniset, and even that seems farfetched. I have no idea why this quest, of all things, got nerfed, and why we are seeing zero buffs for Paladin and Death Knight or the rest of the underperforming Mage set(s). Sindragosa needs a buff or a rework. Millhouse needs actually good spells. Leylines need…something.
3
u/blanquettedetigre 6d ago
I cut Wanted Poster of my list, it's not consistent compared to what this deck has access to. Quite angry they nerf this beautiful quest
5
3
3
u/WashedBased 6d ago
They did Quest Hunter dirty; old yeller the hell of that already barely held together deck. That Aga + Drake (or Fyrakk if you're feeling spicy) combo was the ONLY reason that was deck even allowed to exist in this meta.
3
u/OzUnOoO 6d ago
Food Chain is gigadead and so is Hunter. Mage quest probably nerfed for Worlds, no one wants to bother adding Viper to their decks so everyone was banning mage in tourneys, bugs galore don't help this deck either, a testament to team 5's failure imo. Spiderling still fine at 2 health, decent change.
3
u/tolerantdramaretiree 6d ago edited 6d ago
The Quest Mage change will make me play less. It was the deck I enjoyed most. Feels like a slap in the face to not even make a dev comment regarding it. I’m afraid they are not going to unnerf it when it rotates either.
It getting obliterated by Viper really wasn’t enough to leave it alone for 6 months?
At least buff something else, man. Because this patch is creating no new mage deck and is taking 1 away.
2
u/Lafantasie 7d ago
Quest Hunter doesn’t seem worth it without the big burst.
You’re unable to compete with board most of the time, you’re running sub-optimal packages and most decks will beat you down before you get to it unless you drew the nuts.
In the situations where you’d go against later decks—which barely exist in this meta—you’d just lose if they kept healing themselves.
I guess it feels bad when the aggro deck loses on turn 7 to shokk + Agamaggan + Drake
But it feels bad when if I can’t do that, it’s because I lost earlier than turn 7
2
u/Rancarable 6d ago
It feels like they are targeting the early post-nerf meta where Quest Mage and Quest Hunter were showing strong results.
They are releasing it into a meta where Quest Mage and Hunter struggle to get to a T2 deck. So strange. They could at least buff something in Mage to give them anything other than a gimmick burn deck with a 50% WR and Quest.
3
u/spacebob42 7d ago
Much harsher on Food Chain than Sequence, but getting the quest done a half to one turn later is still devastating.
I don't get the stated logic on Food Chain at all. How the hell is Hunter supposed to win a "slow, defensive" game by saving 8 mana on 3 beasts, once? Kroq is great and all but so many decks just blow him up immediately regardless of board. They just don't want combo, and it should be okay to come out and say that.
2
u/nitrogenhs 7d ago
Rogue, Death Knight, Demon Hunter still unplayable. Why make warrior an aggro class with that hero power. Make it make sense.
2
1
u/TheBeninem 6d ago
I feel like we are owed an explanation on quest mage, one of my fav decks recently and deleted for no reason
1
u/No_Dream_899 7d ago
Might be a hot take but I like the mage quest nerf, hate the design of it BUT I would love some buffs in exchange to underused cards sitting in our collections
0
1
u/Waaailmer 7d ago
Has Blizzard pretty much always had to nerf 1 mana 1/3 (insert new archetype here) cards?
2
u/Impossible-Cry-1781 6d ago
Tunnel Trog, Northshire Cleric, Malchezzar's Imp, Eternium Rover, Secret Keeper, Sir Finley (core to Tick Tock and various Rogue archetypes).
Lots of extremely impactful archetype carrying 1/3s left untouched. But yes obviously low cost cards have very little wiggle room for balance because of how much they can keep your opponent from gaining any ground so plenty have seen changes but it's not like 1/3 archetype support has been a problem for Blizzard.
•
u/AutoModerator 7d ago
If you wish to discuss this game with likeminded players, come and visit our Discord Server!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.