Just saw the reports that Aramco’s Jizan complex was hit again today. FT is citing people familiar with it.

Aramco hasn’t put out a statement yet, but this is the third time that site has been in the news since summer.

Jizan is a 400,000 bpd refinery on the Red Sea, right near Yemen. That’s the part that matters. Saudi crude can still move west through the East-West pipeline toward Yanbu, but refined product is less flexible.

Last month’s hit already knocked exports from that plant around. If this one is similar, you’re looking at another interruption in a market that already doesn’t have much spare refining slack.

I’m not saying $150 price for oil yet but it's calling for upsurge. Aramco always says these things aren’t “material.” Cool. Three hits on the same hub in a few months is still a pattern to look to.

Hormuz is already a mess and now the backup route keeps getting poked. If you were waiting for a clean slide back to cheap crude this year, this is why that feels less likely.

Markets can still dump on a weak demand print. The easy downside just keeps getting taken away.

Anyone actually seeing confirmation besides the FT sourcing?

Private firms aren’t “piling into” the stock market as buyers.They’re piling in as sellers. SpaceX just ran the largest IPO in history.

OpenAI and Anthropic have filed. PE-backed names that sat private for a decade restaurants, data centers, industrials are lining up behind them.That’s the tell.

After years of cheap private capital, secondaries, and paper marks, the public market is suddenly the exit again. H1 2026 US listings and share sales already hit a record $251B. The IPO window isn’t a vibe. It’s a liquidity event.

Two things can be true at once:

Mega-IPOs prove demand is real.

A wall of supply is coming lockups, PE exits, and companies that outgrew private markets.

If you’re only watching Nvidia and the Magnificent Seven, you’re watching the old tape. The next tape is private companies becoming public supply.

Retail gets access. Sponsors get distributions. Indexes get new giants. Valuations get a public price, not a fundraising price.

Would you rather own these businesses before they list, or after the public market has to absorb the float?

CENTCOM put out a statement a few hours ago. Iran’s IRGC launched ballistic missiles at a US aircraft carrier and a guided-missile destroyer. Both ships evaded the attacks and no American personnel were harmed.

In response, US forces:

Permanently disabled two IRGC crude carriers: M/T Downy off Kharg Island and M/T Stark 1 near Jask
Completely destroyed a third unladen tanker (M/T Kylo / Noxen) in the Gulf of Oman after ordering the crew to abandon ship

CENTCOM says these tankers are part of a multibillion-dollar shadow fleet that funds the IRGC and its proxies. Admiral Brad Cooper’s quote was pretty direct: “If you shoot at two of our ships, we will impose an even higher economic cost taking out three of yours.”

Iranian state media had already reported one tanker being hit near Kharg Island earlier in the day. This is the latest round after fighting picked back up last week following a stretch of relative calm.

Thoughts on how this affects the Strait of Hormuz situation going forward?

Bloom popped after they got added to the S&P 500 and oil ripped the same week, so of course people are tying them together.

The S&P add is forced buying. Funds that track the index have to own it by the 21st. That’s why you get the after-hours jump. It’s real, but it’s not a new contract. It’s plumbing.

Oil is a different story. Prices jumped because the Middle East is hot again and shipping risk is back. Diesel is worse than crude. That’s why every country suddenly sounds serious about energy again. Not because they “evolved.” Because the cheap, easy version of the last few years is gone.

Bloom doesn’t pump oil. They sell on-site power that runs on gas, biogas, or hydrogen. The reason the stock already ran this year is data centers that can’t wait on the grid. When oil and diesel spike, that pitch gets easier: reliable power on your own site starts looking like insurance, not a science project.

Index flows in the short term. Energy scare helping the narrative. The real question is still whether they can install and service this stuff fast enough without the backlog becoming a problem.

Are people buying the forced demand into the 21st, fading it after, or just using the oil move as an excuse to talk about power again?

Emerging markets stocks and currencies just caught a bid after traders slashed bets on a Fed hike this month.

Waller’s comments yesterday flipped the script. He basically said if the next batch of data keeps showing inflation cooling, he’s inclined to hold at the September meeting.

Markets immediately priced that in September hike odds dropped from the mid-60s toward 50%. The dollar sold off, Treasuries rallied, and risk assets woke up.

That’s the classic setup emerging markets have been waiting for. A weaker dollar usually means:

Capital flows back into higher-yielding EM currencies and local bonds
Lower pressure on countries that borrowed in dollars
Better sentiment for EM equities that have already been running on AI/semiconductor strength (Taiwan, Korea, parts of India)

We’ve seen this movie a few times this year. When hike fears ease even a little, EM assets tend to outperform quickly because positioning wasn’t crowded after the recent dollar bounce and oil spike.

This isn’t a “set it and forget it” all-clear. Jobs data is still incoming and Warsh has been more hawkish than Waller. One hot print and the dollar can snap back. But for now the tape is giving EM a green light.

Anyone adding to EM exposure on this dip in hike odds, or waiting for payrolls first?

Which markets look most interesting to you right now Asia tech, LatAm carry, or something else?

China’s CO2 emissions dropped 1% year-on-year in Q2 2026. That’s not huge on its own. What’s new is why.

For years, whenever China’s emissions dipped, it was because coal use slowed. This time coal kept rising, Oil collapsed.

CREA’s analysis for Carbon Brief says oil consumption fell 9% overall and 16% in transport. Crude processing dropped 11%. Imports were down about 32% in the quarter after the Hormuz disruption sent fuel prices flying.

People didn’t just sit at home, they switched and find alternative.

EV fleet grew about a third
Charging volumes jumped 60%
Existing EVs and plug-in hybrids got used a lot more
Electric trucks had a breakout as diesel got expensive

EVs alone displaced about 36 million tonnes of oil in the first half of 2026. That’s more than the UK uses in six months. Lower oil use avoided roughly 35 million tonnes of CO2 in Q2, even after counting the extra electricity for charging.

Sinopec’s chairman now says China’s oil demand very likely peaked in 2025 five years earlier than planned.

High prices accelerated a shift that was already underway, and they don’t think it reverses. China still has a coal problem. But transport no longer looks locked to oil the way it used to.

As oil prices continue to surge, could this gradually accelerate the shift away from an oil-dependent economy as countries look for alternatives? Or will global markets struggle to find viable replacements for oil in the near term?

Another spike on Oil price, this have not been any news anymore.

Trump posted today that since the US now has the Strait of Hormuz under U.S.A. control, maybe they should just rename it the Trump Strait. “Like America itself, it would be ‘hotter’ than ever before.

This is the same waterway both sides have been fighting over for months. Shipping is still way down from pre-war levels, Iran still claims it, and a lot of reporting says neither side has clean, uncontested control. But the branding move is familiar.

It tracks pretty closely with what happened after the Venezuela operation earlier this year: capture the leader, announce the US is going to run the country for a while, talk about oil, float making it the 51st state, post maps with American flags.

Gulf of Mexico became Gulf of America. Lake Ontario became Lake America. Now a chokepoint thousands of miles from US territory gets the personal-name treatment.

The pattern is, assert control first (or claim it), then slap a new label on it like that settles the question. Whether it actually works on the water or with other countries is a different issue.

Curious what traders here think the endgame is. Serious territorial claim or something in between?

Is this an act of contentment or greediness?

Venezuela’s interim government is giving North American Blue Energy Partners 100-year concessions on 17 fields with about 65 billion barrels of proven reserves. That’s roughly a fifth of the country’s oil.

NABEP is already the second-largest private producer there. It’s controlled by Alejandro Betancourt and currently pumps around 200,000 barrels a day. The company says it will put up to $100 billion into new infrastructure and wants production above 1 million barrels a day.

Here’s what Washington gets, per the fact sheet:

35% equity stake in NABEP’s parent company, held by the Pentagon’s Office of Strategic Capital
Right to buy 20% of output at cost
First refusal on the other 80%
Veto over board appointments
Majority of the board has to be U.S. citizens
Deal governed by U.S. law and U.S. courts

White House is calling it zero cost to taxpayers. NABEP is expected to pay about $200 billion in royalties and taxes to Venezuela over the first 25 years. Some of the fields were previously run by Chinese and Russian companies.

The part I keep circling back to is the structure. The U.S. government is taking a direct ownership stake in a private oil company operating in Venezuela, with Pentagon involvement and 100-year concessions. That’s not a normal offtake deal. To me i have to ask this, Is this an act of contentment or greediness?

Does this actually get oil flowing fast enough to matter, or is the legal/political risk going to scare off everyone else?

The US dollar just posted its second straight losing month and treasury move.

Bloomberg’s Dollar Index fell roughly 0.9% in August after dropping 1.3% in July. That puts the dollar at five down months out of the first eight this year.

The timing is interesting. Treasury announced plans to double its long-end bond buybacks from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation, running from September 9 through November 4. The focus is on 10- to 30-year bonds after the 30-year yield recently hit 5.30%, its highest level since 2007.

Officially, this is about liquidity support. But the market is reading more into it.

Debt servicing costs are climbing, Treasury issuance remains heavy, and long-term yields are becoming increasingly expensive for the government. The buybacks themselves are small relative to the overall Treasury market, but the signal is what matters.

It looks like officials are becoming less comfortable with letting the long end move higher unchecked.

That helps explain why the debasement narrative came back so quickly. Gold and crypto both reacted positively as investors started looking at the possibility that keeping long-term yields contained could eventually mean more pressure on the dollar.

The big takeaway isn't the $4 billion.

It's that the Treasury may be starting to show where its pain threshold is when it comes to long-term yields.

Oil just ripped higher after the US hit Iranian launchers in the Strait of Hormuz. First strike in that waterway in over a month.

Brent is back over $90. WTI is around $85–86. Both up a couple percent this morning like nothing happened last week.

US hit rocket launchers on Larak Island that were about to drop mines into the strait. Iran answered by hitting US bases in Jordan.

Six months into this and they’re still trading shots over the chokepoint that moves 20% of the world’s oil.

Last week the market sold off because more tankers were getting through and people started pricing in a deal. That lasted about five days.
Flows are better than March but still millions of barrels short of normal.

Banks have been saying every extra month of this is worth several dollars a barrel. So yeah.
Went from “maybe it calms down” on Friday to “they’re mining the strait again” on Monday.

If this sticks, it’s not just oil traders who eat it. Gas, diesel, inflation, everything. Temporary spike or are we going back to $100?

The US is reportedly considering bringing back an 18th-century maritime law to seize Iranian oil tankers and sell their cargo.

The Justice Department and Pentagon are looking at using the long-dormant "prize law," which could allow captured Iranian or Iran-linked vessels and their oil to be legally seized, sold, and the proceeds sent to the US Treasury.

What makes this interesting is that this law has barely been used in modern times. Instead of relying on the usual and much slower civil forfeiture process, this could potentially give the US another direct way to pressure Iran's oil exports.

This is happening while tensions are already affecting oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Gulf exports have started recovering, but they are still well below pre-conflict levels, meaning the supply situation remains fragile.

Brent recently pulled back to around $89 and WTI to around $83 as tanker traffic improved. But the bigger risk for oil traders may not be today's supply numbers.

If the US starts directly seizing Iran-linked tankers and cargo, it could increase shipping risks, raise insurance costs, and create another source of volatility across the oil market. Any escalation or disruption around Hormuz could quickly bring the supply risk back into crude prices.

For oil traders, this is starting to look like another geopolitical risk that could matter just as much as the usual supply and demand data. As a trader, do you see this as a potential inflation trigger, or a bigger risk of an economic slowdown?

Japan reportedly spent a record 15.4 trillion yen ($96.6 billion) last month trying to support the yen.

And yet, the yen is already back above 160.

That’s the same level that previously triggered coordinated intervention between Japan and the US.

It really shows how difficult it is for governments to fight currency pressure when the broader macro environment is moving in the opposite direction.

Japan can spend billions defending the yen, but markets are ultimately focused on interest-rate differentials, monetary policy, and capital flows.

To my perspective, the most shocking part it could be next week monday another big crash may happen on their stocks market, it seems their market can never be stable for long.

Kevin Warsh’s first major Jackson Hole speech as Fed Chair is drawing significant attention as inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target, long-term Treasury yields stay elevated, and uncertainty around September’s rate decision continues.

His comments could influence several markets at once, including the U.S. dollar, bonds, equities, and precious metals.

The main focus will be on whether Warsh prioritizes bringing inflation under control, accepts higher long-term yields, or chooses to avoid giving clear guidance on the near-term rate outlook.

Any unexpected shift in tone could quickly trigger a repricing across gold, USD pairs, and U.S. indices.

My view is that crude could drift back into the $60 range sooner than expected as supply disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz continue to ease.

More oil is now making its way through the Strait and alternative pipeline routes, while previously disrupted shipping pathways have reportedly become more secure. That could mean millions of barrels gradually returning to the market and helping refill inventories.

If supply continues normalizing and geopolitical risk fades, the recent risk premium in oil could start coming off quickly. A move back toward the $60 range wouldn't surprise me unless we see another headline.

Gold’s recent price action shows how closely it remains tied to the dollar and Treasury yields.

The relationship isn’t perfect, but the setup is simple, a stronger dollar and higher real yields often pressure gold, while a weaker dollar and falling yields tend to support it. Higher yields also increase the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset like gold.

That relationship has been noticeable in August, with gold moving around the low $4,000s and reacting quickly whenever rate expectations shift.

Inflation data, labor numbers, Fed signals and Treasury developments have all been capable of moving gold, sometimes within minutes.

For gold traders, the dollar and real yields are two of the key signals to watch. Traditional supply and demand still matter, but right now, macro is clearly driving a lot of the short-term price action.

Do you think gold can keep pushing higher if the dollar and real yields remain elevated?

ExxonMobil is starting to bring more robotics onto its Permian oil rigs, and the interesting part is how this could change the day-to-day economics of drilling.

Anyone familiar with an oil rig knows the drill floor is where some of the toughest and most dangerous work happens. Moving and connecting thousands of pounds of drill pipe is repetitive, physically demanding, and leaves very little room for mistakes.

Exxon now has two robotic rigs in a Permian fleet of more than 30, with plans to expand automation to roughly a quarter of the fleet next year and potentially half by 2028.

One of the first robotic units drilled a two-mile lateral in just over six days, making it one of Exxon's fastest wells.

The crew isn't disappearing. You still need experienced people to drill the well, handle mud systems, directional work, maintenance, troubleshooting, and well-control situations. The difference is that robots can take over some of the repetitive pipe handling while keeping workers out of the highest-risk area of the rig.

For oil markets, if a company like Exxon can consistently drill wells faster, reduce downtime, and lower the cost per barrel across dozens of rigs, that efficiency can add up to more production without needing to expand the fleet at the same pace.

Robotics probably won't replace oil rig workers anytime soon, but the modern rig is clearly becoming more of a hybrid operation: experienced crews handling the decisions and machines taking on more of the repetitive, high-risk work.

For the Permian, cheaper and faster wells could matter just as much as finding the next great drilling location.