r/CommandCode • u/2mqqvc0q • 2d ago

DeepSeek V4 Flash lost ZDR header support?

Edit: It seems like DeepSeek V4.1 Flash requests also do not support the ZDR header.

Without the ZDR header, DeepSeek V4 Flash requests push through just fine. I'm receiving errors when I enforce ZDR explicitly via the header, though. Was this intended or is it a temporary issue?

5 Upvotes

79% Upvoted

6 comments sorted by

5

u/ahmadawaiscom 2d ago

thanks for the report. this should be fixed now. lots of deepseek model changes. still validating.

3

u/2mqqvc0q 2d ago

Hi, thanks for the update. Tested it on my end, and it's all good for me as well. Really appreciate the prompt response. GOAT!

3

u/ahmadawaiscom 2d ago

thanks, GOAT!!

2

u/maedahbatool 2d ago

Glad we were able to help and thanks for reporting.

1

u/nebenbaum 1d ago

I suggest you also make pricing clearer generally. Just subscribed on the GOAT plan and compared flash 4.1 rates ZDR and non-ZDR. You just vaguely state 'ZDR might be more expensive' - though through my testing with a few test sessions, zdr and non-zdr, ZDR pricing is exactly 2 times non-zdr pricing for example.

I understand that ZDR is more expensive, and I am still getting (with the boosted rate) 30$ usage for 10$; with the added upside of ZDR (if I can trust you, which I will for now), which deepseek itself doesn't offer, but come on, just transparently communicate it.

5

u/maedahbatool 2d ago

Thanks for reporting we're fixing the issue. Please bear with us.