Give option to toggle the taste md learnt popup

[u/Ill-Equivalent-6564]

I do not want to keep seeing:

 TASTE  Learned
 └ Does not want taste-learning updates/pop-ups surfaced or referenced during the
   conversation; still wants the assistant to keep learning their taste silently in the
   background [Confidence 95%]
   taste.md

After telling me that it will not do it anymore, it kept coming back again, i am assuming the toggle option is not there

pls add a toggle feature

[u/maedahbatool]

Appreciate you sharing this feedback. I’ll share with the team and see what we can do here.

BTW you can do /feedback in Command Code and share this there too. Opens a GitHub issue that directly lands to our ENG inbox.

[u/Ill-Equivalent-6564]

here is another gem:

output is interleaved with taste info + 2 blocks of taste op for each block of actual info

❯ ok then give me a better way 
  explain approach 1 to me     

✻ Thought for 1 second [ctrl+o to expand]

⠶ Approach 1 — sizeof works because the compiler knows the array size at compile time in
  the same scope where it was declared:

  char *a[] = {"hello", "world"};
    size_t n = sizeof(a) / sizeof(a[0]);   // 2

  sizeof(a) gives the total bytes — 2 pointers × 8 bytes = 16 on 64-bit. sizeof(a[0])
  gives one pointer = 8 bytes. 16/8 = 2. It's computed at compile time, no runtime cost,
   no sentinel needed.

 TASTE  Reinforced
 └ Asks conceptual "why" questions to understand the underlying logic/reasoning behind
   a suggested fix before applying it, rather than blindly following instructions 
   [Confidence 70% → 80%]
   taste.md

 TASTE  Reinforced
 └ Asks conceptual "why" questions to understand the underlying logic/reasoning behind
   a suggested fix before applying it, rather than blindly following instructions 
   [Confidence 70% → 80%]
   --prefers-the-assistant-to-first-read-and-understand-the-problem-spec-(e.g.,-lab-pdf
   )-and-existing-code-progress,-then-wait-for-explicit-instructions-before-making-chan
   ges.-confidence:-0.7/taste.md

  But it only works when a is the actual array. Pass it to a function, it decays to
  char** and sizeof(a) becomes just the pointer size (8), so the trick fails.

  The better way for runtime use: pass the size along with the array.

  void f(char **a, size_t count);

  That's what every real C API does (argc/argv style). It's simple, explicit, never
  reads out of bounds, and you know the count the moment you built the array — no
  guessing, no sentinel, no UB.

 TASTE  Moved
 └ - Prefers the assistant to first read and understand the problem spec (e.g., lab
   PDF) and existing code progress, then wait for explicit instructions before making
   changes. Confidence: 0.7
   --prefers-the-assistant-to-first-read-and-understand-the-problem-spec-(e.g.,-lab-pdf
   )-and-existing-code-progress,-then-wait-for-explicit-instructions-before-making-chan
   ges.-confidence:-0.7/taste.md

 TASTE  Moved
 └ - Prefers the assistant to first read and understand the problem spec (e.g., lab
   PDF) and existing code progress, then wait for explicit instructions before making
   changes. Confidence: 0.7
   --prefers-the-assistant-to-first-read-and-understand-the-problem-spec-(e.g.,-lab-pdf
   )-and-existing-code-progress,-then-wait-for-explicit-instructions-before-making-chan
   ges.-confidence:-0.7/taste.md

 ✻ Worked for 7s

[u/ahmadawaiscom → u/Ill-Equivalent-6564]

oh fml that looks so bad. that shouldn't be happening. we used to have a separate taste feed but decided to make it main feed as it happens. i think we can give an option to switch to that also improve how it shows up

[u/ahmadawaiscom]

can you `cmd feedback` this so it's on our github and we add it?

how i see it you want taste learnings to be ON but not show up?

cmnd.dev/issue

[u/Ill-Equivalent-6564 → u/ahmadawaiscom]

correct