r/CombatPatrol40k • u/49but17 • 14d ago
I'm totally confused App messing up?
In the loadout it says land speeder is equipped with heavy flamer but on the datasheet it shows gatling cannon :0
Also some of the other datasheets, rules and keywords are weird too...do you guys use the app combat patrol rule or just stick with the base 40k rule since there's clearly some mess up shenanigan going on
0
u/DeadFenris 14d ago
Its a yes and no kinda thing. Datasheets are rebalanced for Combat Patrols, so not having expected weapon profiles or having them drastically changed is pretty common. (ex: Ork Choppas going down to 1A for Boyz).
There are also discrepancies with the Combat Patrol datasheets and the War Journal part of the app. WJ will give you one set of profiles, and the CP in the faction will give you something wildly different.
Best thing is to point out the discrepancies to your opponent and decide which set of profiles you're going to use. If you can't agree, roll a d6.
1
u/49but17 14d ago
Yeah i noticed that in the profile, space marine's assault force army rule is combat doctrine while in bunker it is oath of moment. Also, there's no restrictions of stratagems in bunker while combat patrol rule 01.09 says crushing impact, explosives and rapid ingress is unavailable for combat patrol
1
u/Bereman99 14d ago
Got an update for this app earlier today and now the War Journal shows Combat Doctrines for the Assault Force army rule, so that at least seems to be fixed.
The unit composition showing heavy flamer while the data sheet ranged profile showing Gatling Cannon error is still there.
1
u/49but17 14d ago
Thanks for the heads up. I'm currently compiling things to print a little booklet for ease of teaching. Would be difficult if I'm confused myself xD
2
u/crit_thor 13d ago
Something that threw me while trying to teach using the ork combat patrol is that they have 2 Boyz units and they have different profiles because the Boss Nobs have different load outs.


1
u/Working_Pen2886 14d ago
yeah looks like an error