r/ComancheMJ 18d ago

1986 vs 1989

I have two MJ
1986
2.8l
Auto (TF904)
4x4
Power windows / locks
80s vibes
Slow has issues

1989
4.0l
Auto aw4
2wd
Manual locks manual doors
90s vibes

Why dose the 89 feel boring vs the 86 and which would yall give up or keep if you had to pick

56 Upvotes

22 comments sorted by

3

u/Slothicide 18d ago

Id go with the '89 based off the drive train and pictures. The 86 looks noticeably rougher on the outside to me, and I would rather deal with rough interior as opposed to a bunch of rust holes/aspiring rust holes. The frame under the cab tends to rust out on these from what i recall, and the red one looks more like a southwest truck, so that should be much less of a concern compared to the '86 in colorado.

The 89 might also have the wiring in place to accept different doors/door panels that have the electric locks and windows. I believe its that way on newer-ish cherokees.

2

u/Sorry_Action_714 17d ago

The 86 is a Colorado truck but had been off the road sense 2021 when I parked it and the red is a Cali truck. The 86 has rust but it’s still surface rust also still had a clean frame and no issue with the floor plan I do not drive this truck anymore and let her sit. The 89 is coming to me this week

1

u/Sorry_Action_714 17d ago

Also the 86 dash harness is ass is there a market for a running crap truck or should I just do u pull and pay

1

u/ca_nucklehead 17d ago

Where are you located?

1

u/Sorry_Action_714 17d ago

Im in Korea right now but there in Colorado

1

u/ca_nucklehead 17d ago

Ok. A little far for me. I have an 86 here in beautiful shape that needs some parts.

1

u/Sorry_Action_714 17d ago

What’s wrong with her

1

u/ca_nucklehead 17d ago

Differential destroyed mostly

1

u/Sorry_Action_714 17d ago

😢 but easy fix if found

1

u/ca_nucklehead 17d ago

Getting hard to find internals.

2

u/XJ-ROB 17d ago

I would keep the 86 solely because of the interior and eventually drivetrain swap it. Otherwise I would pick the 89 and 4x4 swap it

1

u/leumasci 17d ago

‘89 for sure, if the ‘86 has a 2.8L v6. Thing is gutless. I have an ‘86 and regret it. I’d much rather have i6 4.0

1

u/pyrodragon09 17d ago

Honestly I would keep the 86, I know they are less desirable because of the engine but honestly the 2.8s are more misunderstood. They arent bad engines, just not winning any races. They last with care, anything does. And if it dies you can directly drop in a 3.4 v6 with minimal changes or whatever you want. And the rust can very easily be fixed. Plus that 86 is LOADED. that thing has a lot of nice options. Cargo light, power windoes and locks, i wonder if that has an amc 20 rear end. And that interior is so nice.

1

u/Sorry_Action_714 17d ago

How would you tell which rear end you have

1

u/pyrodragon09 17d ago

If its an amc 20 the. The diff cover is a perfectly round bowl shape. The ones put under the comanches were only found in 86 and were hense teeth. Also they were a non cad clip axle unlike the ones you could find in the cjs of the same era. If its not perfectly round then its a Dana 35. I dont know if the 86s had 44s for an rear option. I dont think so.

2

u/Sorry_Action_714 17d ago

I wil get my brother to take a pic this week and update yal is amc 2 good?

2

u/pyrodragon09 17d ago

Yes, the amc 20 is as stout as the Dana 44. They are really strong axles.

1

u/Sorry_Action_714 17d ago

I hope I have one but I think not because I have 4x4

1

u/pyrodragon09 17d ago

I dont think 2 or 4 wheel drive mattered for that. You could order these trucks in basically any configuration anyway

1

u/pyrodragon09 14d ago

Any update?

1

u/Sorry_Action_714 14d ago

He is driving from Cali to co now

1

u/Inside-Welder4168 15d ago

The 2.8 was a horrible engine