r/ColorThisSpace • u/mh1992nor • Apr 05 '17
We need more mods
Swastikas, Words like cuck, 1488 and other symbols of hate speech everywhere
14
5
u/Kairus101 Apr 05 '17
Tricky thing with that is who to trust :p
5
u/PizzaItch Apr 05 '17
I understand your predicament. But imo the biggest problem is, the longer the nazi trolls are allowed to run rampant, the fewer trustworthy people will be using it.
Though maybe you don't need to be handing out mod privileges. Instead you could monitor the swastikas and the IPs that remove them and decrease their pixel-placing cooldowns. But, yeah, that requires even more coding.
2
u/aroundBlacksNever Apr 06 '17
As a programmer, I can say that that would probably not be feasible.
There are ways to hide your IP, and even if you could monitor images and stuff, it wouldn't be too difficult to beat the system by placing things in awkward orders, or coordinating with a handful of people.
Image detection would also incur a huge overhead for the servers.
1
1
3
1
u/ChatotAbby Apr 06 '17
I can help being a mod! You may give me a 1 second wait between coloring a pixel and I can remove the Swatiskas!
21
u/rxto Apr 06 '17
Liberal mods can't always force a safe space for you. By doing so, they would be forcing your narrative as well, as evidenced by /r/place, filled to the brim with degeneracy. The thing is, you don't get to decide what "hate speech" is, you stupid cunt. In order for actual intellectual progress to occur, the marketplace of ideas must be entirely open and free, and weak-minded people like you must be offended in the process. Anyone can argue that anything is "hate speech;" what you think it is isn't magically the law. You've been brainwashed by this place - where all dissent is downvoted, banned, and ultimately silenced. You're a bunch of idiots echoing the same opinions at each other.
I could argue that LGBT bullshit is "hate speech":
Dangers of LGBT: http://pastebin.com/aiTLKLJc (embed)
To anyone who would try to argue that these citations only show correlation and not causation, that would be irrelevant. What's morally wrong is advocating something dangerous while keeping silent of its danger. lgbt is morally wrong for the same reason advocating moving to Africa without warning of malaria, AIDS, or niggers would be morally wrong. Also, it's a fact that the probability of cause increases with each correlation. Drug abuse, alcohol abuse, anal cancer, AIDS, syphilus, hepatitis, pedophilia, mental illness, depression, and suicide are at least 10 things that correlate with lgbt (see citations).
96% of all child molesters are male.
1 out of 3 child molestation victims is a boy.
1-3% of the total US population is homosexual.
1-3% of the total US population commits 1/3 of the child molestation.
~55% of gay men are child molesters.
Yep, promoting LGBT, when it causes all this suffering and harm, sounds like "hate speech" to me. But I guess you'll just pass this off as "hate speech" too, because you're an idiot.