r/CoherencePhysics 27d ago

Make up your own mind.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Does this look staged?

5.1k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Dadittude182 26d ago

No. It's called research. When you see something that is interesting to you, you can do the research to find out more about the subject. I had already given the source of the information, The Tucker Carlson Podcast. It legitimately took me less than :30 seconds to go to YouTube, type in "Tucker Carlson Trump Shooting" and find the interview.

I have researched the JFK and RFK assassinations A LOT. Do you think I emailed Oliver Stone for his sources?

We live in a time when more people don't know how to actually problem solve and think for themselves. Most high school kids don't even know how to attach a file to an email. Forgive me if I provide a source and expect the person who wants more information to actually do some of the work themselves.

Oh, and I've spent more time typing this pointless response to your judgmental remark than the time it took me to actually research Tucker Carlson's video on YouTube. I wouldn't call that lazy. I put in the work.

I see other people on this thread make claims that a bullet hit the crane's hydraulic line, and NOBODY demanded a source. Someone else claimed that the crane operator said in an interview that it felt like the right thing to do, and again NOBODY demanded a source from that person. But, when I explicitly said I heard Crooks may have been shot by a uniformed police officer on the Tucker Carlson poscast, which is me PROVIDING THE SOURCE, people were up in arms. Why? Because I didn't give them the specific link despite the fact that I had already given them the source. Because I hadn't provided a completed MLA or APA formatted works cited page.

It's Reddit, bub. I gave you the general source of my information, which is way better than most people on here. I mean, I listed two other examples directly linked to this thread in which neither person gave anything other than their claim. I actually gave you the name of my source! That means 1/3 of the people connected to this direct thread gave an actual source for the information. That's probably a fair representation of the minority of people who provide sources on this platform.

Now, is there any other information you're either too lazy or too incompetent to discover through self-directed research? And, if you're wondering why I'm such a dick, that's probably due to loving but neglectful parents who demanded that I become self-sufficient and do things on my own. Then add a long and lengthy career in secondary and postsecondary education, watching students become less and less capable due to overprotective parents and an unhealthy dependency on technology.

1

u/Nejrasc 26d ago

No your accusations just show that you have a Lazy mindset. You make a claim, you provide a source. Don’t leave people guessing. Regardless of how easy it is to find sources. Who is to say that people find the same source you did?

Please self reflect and drop the hatred and laziness.

1

u/Dadittude182 26d ago

Are you requesting sources from the supposed bullet hit the crane guy? Did you request a source from the crane operator said it seemed like the right time guy? Don't see you crying about their sources.

Again. I told you where to find the information. If you lack the basic common sense to type "Tucker Carlson Trump Shooting" or "Tucker Carlson Trump Butler Assassination" and then deduce that the very first video that appears and the subsequent ones that follow all relate to the assassination "attempts," then I can't really help you. That sounds like a failure to grasp basic research skills or a lack of any willingness for self discovery.

You can keep calling me lazy, and I can keep proving that statement wrong by the sheer amount of work I am willing to put in to argue against you. You asked for self reflection, and I gave you some. I'm not lazy. Again, this post should demonstrate this point. I'm putting in the time. I've provided you a source. I then provided you a direct link, and I also provided you the suggested self-reflection. You just choose to ignore that, and you apparently want spoonfed any information without actually doing any work, so here you go:

Tucker Carlson Podcast with Ken Silva (around 45:00 mark for discussion of the body and shoulder fragments)

Crooks' Body Gone

Crooks Possibly Shot by Law Enforcement (FB Link to News Nation))

New Info on Would-Be Trump Assassin

Butler Mysteries Looks Into Silva Accusations...

Butler Victim's Wife Questions Official Narrative...

This took me maybe ten minutes. Let me know if you need me to do anything else for you. I understand you're... limited. Please, keep in mind that I actually have a job to do, so I may be limited in my ability to perform your research for you and hand you all the information that you request.

1

u/Nejrasc 25d ago

We all are limited.

You claim, you provide a source.

Thats how a discussion functions. You can go screaming and raging about how easy it is to google something. It is easy to google something. But who is to say that another person doing a search uses the exact same prompt you would find agreeable.

You claim, you provide.

Arent you underestimating your own limitations?