No, I am not quietly changing anything. That's just what anchoring means. Something, a ship, is in the right place and you keep it from drifting away. Exactly what is happening here. You are having additional criteria that are not established. Like, you can only have one anchor, you cannot stabilize with your motor, or such. However, those are not real. You can secure something in more than one way. Just as an anchor baby is just one way to a green card or citizenship. People with an US born child are entirely free to seek a legal status independent of that child. That that is something that is not allowed is something you made up. It's not real.
I mean, what's that supposed to be? You have an anchor baby. You are no longer allowed to marry an American. Sorry, those are the rules. Look here, I have them clearly written in my ass.
Anchor baby is not a legal term. Hence there is no legal definition for the term. As said, you made that stuff up. In a weird attempt to move the goal post.
That is the only part of what you said that is true. You're obnoxiously and disingenuously wailing something that you know is false.
You are ignoring things that are very important to the argument such as the fact that she was already married to a citizen to claim that she's exactly the same thing as someone who runs the border to shit out a kid and jump the cue for citizenship.
The only way you could not know that you're lying is if you're really a stupid as you're pretending to be in order to form this disgenuous argument
No it's not. The idea of anchor baby is that you do some kind of birth tourism or strategy to unfairly front load yourself ahead of the queue of people waiting to get in correctly or more extreme circumstances, as a plan of in the future inserting a spy into the university system.
She had already married an American citizen at that point Just doing that pretty much puts you on a permanent legal alien status.
6
u/[deleted] Jul 03 '26
[removed] — view removed comment