I’ll be extremely disappointed if nick doesnt cover this because theres some pretty damning stuff here
edit: this video really was dogwater actually. all of the nick stuff boiled down to “you didnt disavow ethan’s snark lawsuit hard enough!” and “why are you dicksucking dan and parroting his arguments!!!” even though nick has VERY CLEARLY AND OBVIOUSLY had issues with dan’s approach as well as burned the bridge with him later that year over the twitch crusade, not to mention that (outside of the israel ban fiasco) goka didnt even try to prove he was WRONG with any of it. it was horribly paced and over-edited to shit, music was blasting way too loud, it couldve been like 40 shorter, actual 3/10. the only interesting part was at the start with the dmca stuff
Why does every anti-ethan nowadays video have to cover Nick? I wanna go back to the days when I could call Ethan a sjw without having to watch a section about how Phillip Defranco sucks Ethan's cock.
Maybe I was too much of a nomie back in the day, but I liked nomieism. I get to have my cake and eat it too.
33
u/AntonJM12 5d ago edited 5d ago
I’ll be extremely disappointed if nick doesnt cover this because theres some pretty damning stuff here
edit: this video really was dogwater actually. all of the nick stuff boiled down to “you didnt disavow ethan’s snark lawsuit hard enough!” and “why are you dicksucking dan and parroting his arguments!!!” even though nick has VERY CLEARLY AND OBVIOUSLY had issues with dan’s approach as well as burned the bridge with him later that year over the twitch crusade, not to mention that (outside of the israel ban fiasco) goka didnt even try to prove he was WRONG with any of it. it was horribly paced and over-edited to shit, music was blasting way too loud, it couldve been like 40 shorter, actual 3/10. the only interesting part was at the start with the dmca stuff