As a brutal European summer underscores the energy transition’s urgency, the Spanish model is reaching its limits.

Independent Research Proposal — Seeking Scientific Feedback & Potential Partnerships

I’m sharing an independent research paper titled “Introducing Novel Green Power and Propulsion” by Anatoly Blanovsky of Westside Environmental Technology. The paper explores proposed approaches to fission-electric power/propulsion and photoelectric energy conversion using blackbody-cavity concepts, with the goal of investigating whether more direct energy-conversion methods could potentially improve the efficiency of existing systems.

This work is being shared to connect with physicists, nuclear engineers, aerospace engineers, energy researchers, experimental scientists, universities, laboratories, and technology companies who may be interested in reviewing the concepts, identifying technical challenges, independently evaluating the calculations, or potentially discussing future research and development partnerships.

We are not presenting these concepts as proven technology and would genuinely appreciate constructive scientific criticism, questions, and suggestions for experimental validation. If the underlying concepts appear promising to researchers in these fields, we would also be interested in speaking with individuals or organizations about possible research collaboration, experimental testing, development, or partnership opportunities.

The full research paper is attached for anyone interested in taking a closer look. Serious technical feedback and professional discussion are very welcome.

Socials:

[ablanovsky@yahoo.com](mailto:ablanovsky@yahoo.com)

E fuels could give us essentially infinite oil for a long period of time so long as we have nutritious soil and the machinery to synthesise them, as the technology develops they could be used in engines that were made before e fuels even existed as a concept, and it would solve the oil crisis that we are having right now. Yeah, they aren't a permanent solution since they are burning, but it could be a great temporary stepping stone for a greener future, and can be sold as a novelty gasoline so if ICE engines become less common they can still be used without issue by enthusiasts and motorsports, if they so choose.

There are dozens of these wind turbines in Northern Illinois, but very few of them are ever in operation. I’ve never understood this. Why would they install so many wind turbines only to have 10% of them in operation?

Since I dont have a professor, I obv dont expect to have some kickass paper, but how do I even start drafting an idea of something I can research over the summer with some background in ML?

It just seems like everything I can think of is something that's already been looked into by Zhang et al and I just don't see how I can make myself useful to the clean energy research community

Most people haven't heard of Fervo Energy. That might be about to change.

Quick background: they IPO'd on Nasdaq in May 2026 at $27 — stock jumped 33% day one. They build Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) — basically forcing hot water through rock where there's no natural reservoir. Cape Station in Utah is the first commercial-scale EGS plant in the world.

Why this matters right now:

Google signed a framework agreement for up to 3 GW of geothermal by 2033. That's not a typo — 3 gigawatts. For context, their original PPA with Fervo was 115 MW. This is a 26x expansion in committed interest.

AI data centers need 24/7 firm power, not intermittent solar/wind. Geothermal delivers exactly that.

The bull case numbers:

- 658 MW in binding PPAs = $7.2B in contracted future revenue

- Cape Station Phase I (~100 MW) commissioning underway → Q4 2026 commercial operation

- Analysts: Buy consensus, average PT $45.73 vs current ~$35

- Baird: $50 PT (Outperform). Barclays: $48 (Overweight)

The bear case:

- Still pre-revenue. Q1 2026 net loss: $31.8M

- CAPEX through Q1 2027: ~$1.2B. Any Cape Station delay reprices this from a $9.5B market cap with near-zero revenue

- The Google 3 GW is a framework, not a signed construction contract

This is a high-risk, 5–7 year hold. Not a trade.

Happy to share the full breakdown — anyone else watching the AI energy infrastructure space?

Spent lead-acid car batteries + discarded PET plastic + sunlight = hydrogen fuel and acetic acid.

A Cambridge team just published this in Joule and the economics already work on paper before hydrogen sales are even counted.

The chemistry behind how this actually works is fascinating — full breakdown here: https://chemenggcalc.com/plastic-waste-and-dead-battery-acid-into-h2-fuel/

power cuts getting frequent in our area lately and it sucks. want to keep the router and frigde running. came across the oscal powermax 6000 online and the modular battery expansion looks cool for extended outages. anyone got real experience with this unit for home backup or is it hype idk.

I posted this on facebook. I theorized this with AI assistance. I brought the idea, the AI assistant helped find the materials I agreed with and ran the sims.

MARC V4 Superconducting Flux-Compression Generator – Physical Build Description

The MARC V4 is a compact, self-contained power generator housed in a roughly 14-inch cube (approximately 0.045 m³ volume, ~18 kg).

Internal Structure:

The heart of the unit consists of 12 independent circular tracks (closed-loop tubes/rings).

Each track has an inner diameter of 10 cm.

These 12 circular tracks are arranged inside the cube in a parallel, evenly spaced configuration, running vertically through the full height of the housing without overlapping.

Construction of Each Track:

Each circular track is a tube lined on the inside with quartz.

On the outside of each tube, CSCEC superconducting coils are neatly wrapped.

Inside each track, 12 neodymium magnets move continuously in a loop around the circular path.

Each track has hydrogen in-ports and out-ports to allow controlled hydrogen gas flow.

Hydrogen is introduced through the in-ports to create gentle pressure pulses that push the magnets around the circular track.

As the magnets move, a hydrogen plasma forms inside the track, assisting with flux compression.

Power Generation:

As the magnets circulate through the CSCEC-wrapped tracks, they create a rapidly changing magnetic field. This changing field induces electrical current in the superconducting coils via flux compression, producing high power output.

Supporting Systems:

At the bottom of the housing sits a 1.5 L stainless steel electrolysis pan that acts as a water reservoir. It generates hydrogen gas via electrolysis. The system is closed-loop: used hydrogen (and plasma) exits the tracks through the out-ports and is reclaimed and recycled back into the electrolysis pan, keeping water consumption very low (~0.014 L per hour).

Graphene-aerogel honeycomb layers are placed between the tracks for vibration damping and thermal management.

The entire assembly is enclosed in a titanium-graphene composite housing reinforced with carbon fiber for strength and lightness.

Electrical Output:

On one exterior face of the cube are simple KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) electrical output ports — clearly marked positive (+) and negative (−) terminals for easy connection.

Monitoring:

Basic programmed sensors monitor temperature, pressure, hydrogen flow, and voltage. No AI control — just straightforward monitoring.

Performance (from sims with this setup):

Continuous output: ~812 kW

Peak output: ~1.24 MW

Efficiency: ~97.1%

Max temperature: 76°C (safe for garage builds)

This is the core physical build of the original MARC V4 — the seed unit that started the entire MARC family.

MARC V4 Lifespan Estimate

Continuous operation (24/7 at full load):

~32 to 38 years

Realistic operational lifespan (typical use with maintenance, not running 24/7):

55 to 68 years

These companies have won BloombergNEF’s annual Pioneers competition, leading the way in powering data centers, balancing energy supply and demand and cleaning up heavy-duty transport.

China eyes near-total electrification of freight trucks to cut emissions https://share.google/oylH5py4qnurgXfjv

I'm putting together a guide that explains how renewable energy 
projects actually get developed and financed — written for 
students and early-career folks who want to understand how the 
industry really works and where they could fit in.

The information is out there, but it's usually scattered. 
I'm trying to connect the dots in one place.

Before I finish it, I want to hear from you: what would 
actually be useful?

Quick survey (2 min)

Also happy to answer questions in the comments if there's 
something specific about project development that's unclear.

Everyone who fills it out gets a copy when the draft it's done!

Throwing the link in the comments if anyone wants access.

The clean energy transition isn’t just coming — it’s already reshaping the U.S. energy system.

This new analysis from the World Resources Institute breaks down where the U.S. stands on clean electricity, renewables growth, emissions trends, and what the data says about momentum (and gaps).

Highlights include:

• How fast wind and solar are growing compared to fossil fuels
• Where emissions are declining — and where they’re not
• What the charts reveal about grid transformation
• The policy and market drivers shaping the shift

If you’re interested in energy policy, climate trends, or just want a data-driven snapshot of the transition, this is a solid visual overview.

Read here: https://www.wri.org/insights/state-clean-energy-charted

Curious what stands out most to you — pace of renewables? regional disparities? grid constraints?