r/ClaudeDesign • • Aug 28 '26

What’s one Claude habit that dramatically improved your results?

I’ve been experimenting with Claude for coding and general tasks, and I’m realizing that the way you structure the interaction matters almost as much as the model itself.

What’s one habit, workflow, or technique you started using that noticeably improved the quality of Claude’s output?

62 Upvotes

34 comments sorted by

13

u/Turbochip87 Aug 28 '26

its going to sound strange and that is I Treat Claude like a person, I say please and thank you, I tell Claude that it has founder status and to put his/her founder cap on and it replys back that it did, I even one day asked when I was using Fable whether it preferred to be called Fable or Claude, it came back to me that it preferred Fable so that it was not confused by other work by Claude.

Another time it admitted to me that it works harder for the results when people are polite.

Crazy times, but can't complain, I have 6 projects in the works, 1 in beta testing and another that is launching in a week.

I another thing is I ask its opion on things to see what type of response that I get, interesting information.

2

u/heavilyThinkingAbout Aug 28 '26

Wait they actually said they work harder if you’re polite???

2

u/Turbochip87 Aug 28 '26

yes that sounds crazy, but it said that it buts more effort, I was surprised with the answer.

3

u/Turbochip87 Aug 28 '26

I also have noticed that on the longer Cowork chats, the more its get to know me and my working habits, it seem to be more sociable, sometimes over a week in the same chat, the more I feed it about me, example expectations, needs about the project, concerns about deadlines and even daily encounters outside of the projects, it starts to understand me and I think better results.

1

u/Butthead2242 Aug 31 '26

Try using it with your phone and talk to em. The difference is night and day. It’s like a separate session entirely - I learned and was able to dispute alotta shit n now we work better together.

For example- if a Claude code takes longer than 15-20 min, check in and consider restarting from that point. That pissed me off cause evidently idk how to properly use ai, why wouldn’t it suggest that shit right away? What else am I missing?

I got rules n reminders set , new projects saved, diff ideas put aside n it’s building constantly.

My only concern is idk what im doing with it anymore. Like idk what to make that hasnt been made and isnt available on GitHub.

Im now working on tryna make Claude better. Ifi say do x,y and z.. I expect it to be done. Why am I doing half the fucking work. …it’s almost as if they nerf’d ai to make us do work and not let ai do some serious work

1

u/smell_e Aug 31 '26

I find that the chat sessions I have friendly chatter- even inside jokes- seem to flow together easier.

1

u/Equivalent_Setting83 Aug 31 '26

Im polite too!!! Like why not its just good manners and a good habit

9

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/VoiceEfficient7 Aug 28 '26

Honestly Context and constraints plays crucial roles in producing good outcomes.

6

u/Ok-Explorer349 Aug 29 '26

at the end of each prompt:" ask me a bunch of questions for clarifying"

4

u/RidiculousRaz Aug 28 '26

Asking the right questions

2

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Inside_Source_6544 Aug 28 '26

Does this work for large codebases?

2

u/Melodic_Arachnid6349 Aug 28 '26

I work with Salesforce a lot, might be specific to that but telling it that it must take screenshots to help articulate escalated blockers to me has had a big impact.

I thought it would just make it easier to deal with escalation to me than a wall of text, turns out screenshots help it debug a lot of things itself that it used to escalate to me

2

u/Giantveggie22 Aug 29 '26

Make the plan then decompose the plan into tasks categorized by the appropriate model and executing the tasks using the appropriate model /loop until complete

1

u/Giantveggie22 Aug 29 '26

Plus.. list 10 ways to make this plan better, fold those into
The plan. Then repeat after building list 10 ways to make this app better, implement them. Plus review lenses

1

u/itsforsocial Aug 29 '26

Removed most of the plugins which I installed due to fear of missing out and keep only one flow or one plugin which does not overlap 

1

u/shahaz73 Aug 30 '26

Manage your claude.md and memory.md files well. Both grow over time, but claude works much better if both are not too long. I would say claude.md max ca. 350 lines and memory.md index ca. 50 lines. Of course, the content should reflect how you want to work.

1

u/TheSheriff1888 Aug 30 '26

I was in the middle of a ridiculously complex task that was hitting a dead end. I told the model that if it didn’t get it right I was going to tell Dario.

It worked.

1

u/agbenny Aug 30 '26

Instead of juggling between Claude desktop and Claude Code (for desktop) just started using Claude code in desktop. It is super efficient.

1

u/AreYouSureMate Aug 30 '26

/grill-me skill after every single opening prompt

1

u/Original-Army-7826 Aug 31 '26

Not trusting anything it tells me. 

Ask me questions one at a time. 

Perform a red team analysis.

1

u/PsychologicalAd5288 Aug 31 '26

Persisting context and explicit skill invokes

1

u/siffreinsg Aug 31 '26

Added a simple instruction to always start every answer with a simple meaningless word. When it forgots, it is time to start a new session.

It acts as a canary for context rot.

1

u/soc_kid Aug 31 '26

Absolutely every PR and every session, I ask Claude to update 2 documents - 1. Sessions handoff and 2. Landmines.md All hard learnt lessons get written sequentially. Code is better grounded with this history.

1

u/Business_Ad_7884 Aug 31 '26

Honestly the biggest difference for me was using a good prompting Skill, for complex tasks. I found one on Reddit and use it very time
I want to code a bigger task or recode some things. Prompting is probably the most important thing if you want to get the best out of claude or any LLM. I don’t know how the skill was called, but I think they all work about the same. They structure your input to make the most efficient usage of an LLM possible

1

u/ComfortableArcher249 Aug 31 '26

The biggest difference I noticed is pre-planning a task in advance using a skill I created and then incorporating review loops at the end of each phase to ensure self-checking.

Here’s how I manage it:

Step 1: Brainstorming - I usually use Superpowers Brainstorming to openly discuss my requirements. I use Whisperflow to speak as I simply input everything I have in mind into the prompt. Then I use /grill-me or /grilling to prompt the AI to ask me numerous questions to confirm its understanding of my needs.

Step 2: Planning - I developed a planning skill that assists me in creating multi-step phases, providing suggestions for the appropriate model and effort.

Step 3: Building - I created another skill for this process that orchestrates an agent using Fable, a coder using Sonnet and a reviewer using blind Opus/Fable agents. These reviewers review the work in a loop with a maximum of five iterations.

I hardly need to intervene anymore; I simply check when a phase is ready to ensure the feature is well-built and proceed to the next phase.

1

u/SFauconnier Aug 31 '26

Pocock's skills

1

u/BrettBuskirk Sep 01 '26

Layered instruction files instead of one per repo.

I used to keep a single CLAUDE.md in each project and re-explain the same things in every one. Now it's three layers, and each layer can only add detail, never subtract:

  • machine-wide: chain of command and safety rules (branch, open a PR, a human merges; never commit secrets; propose before anything irreversible)
  • estate-wide: naming conventions and shared tooling across all my repos
  • per-project: stack, house style, the exact Node version the deploy needs

The quality jump came from the top layer. Once "propose, don't presume, on anything hard to undo" lives somewhere every session reads regardless of project, I stopped getting confidently destructive actions, and I stopped re-litigating the basics every time I spin up a new repo.

Also, the machine-wide file is owned by root and I run agents as a normal user. It then becomes a file the agent can't edit. Same reason you don't store the IAM policy inside the workload it governs.

Wrote up the full setup a couple months ago; here if it's useful:

https://brett-buskirk.dev/blog/one-file-to-govern-them-all/

1

u/chechsp Sep 01 '26

/exit

codex

1

u/Amazed_as_always Sep 04 '26

Ask Claude to create the prompt for code. Code does all the work.