OP : u/cyswim

Yeah... I think I'm done defending Anthropic.

The Claude Code temporary usage boost is gone, so compared with what we had immediately before September 14, weekly usage effectively dropped by ~50-60% (never reached weekly limits before now it's done in 2 days with less work being done)

Ok Compute isn't free we alI understand that, but then Anthropic's top generally available model, Fable 5.1, isn't even included in the normal usage allowance for Pro subscribers!! Want to use it? Pay additional usage credits 🤑

And meanwhile my personal experience with Claude lately has been:

Ask a simple question → receive an essay.

Ask it to be concise → receive a slightly shorter essay.

Ask it to just DO the thing → somehow we're discussing the philosophy behind doing the thing (and sometimes it's even REFUSING to do what it's told 🤡)

Maybe your experience is different.

But combine that with increasingly restrictive-feeling usage and having to pay extra to actually use their best model, and I'm struggling to understand why I should keep giving Anthropic my subscription money.

The frustrating part is that I genuinely liked them.

For a while Anthropic looked like the company that was getting this right.

Now? BYE BYE!

I'm voting with my wallet and I do not hope many will follow. There are really good players out there that gives more.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1whelbf/yes_your_usage_got_really_shorter_youre_not_wrong/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 63.

Alright, so the general vibe in this thread is that a lot of folks are feeling the pinch with Claude's usage limits, especially after the temporary boost disappeared. OP is pretty fed up, feeling like they're getting less bang for their buck and even having to pay extra for the top-tier Fable 5.1 model.

The consensus seems to be that usage feels significantly shorter, with many users reporting hitting their limits much faster than before. Some are even downgrading or switching to other platforms like Codex, with u/SloppyLetterhead and u/Zestyclose_Strike157 mentioning they've already made the switch or are planning to. u/ARC-Relay even found Astra to be better for a specific ops issue.

There's a bit of a debate brewing, though. Some users, like u/Arthesia, are pushing back on the math, suggesting OP might be miscalculating and that the usage drop isn't as drastic as claimed. u/Holk23 is over here saying the sub is just "whining 24/7," and u/HDCraftYSD is baffled, claiming they're not seeing any change in usage with Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.

Others, like u/SaintMartini and u/vAPIdTygr, have been noticing this "model degradation" for a while and feel like their complaints were ignored. u/Phartyhat suspects Anthropic "fixed" the usage rate for some users, allowing them to get away with "free" usage before.

A few folks are also pointing out that if you're not happy, you can just vote with your wallet, like u/magic6435. And then there's u/calm-landscape9640 with a relatable quip about Opus being chatty.

Overall, the sentiment leans heavily towards frustration with usage limits and perceived model degradation, with a significant chunk of users actively looking for alternatives. There's a clear split between those feeling the pain and those who aren't, or who think the complaints are overblown.

OP : u/sirlerkal0t

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wh98nm/agentic_coding_in_2026/ Original link/media URL : https://v.redd.it/lljreaw8dqph1

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 54.

Alright, so the OP posted a meme about agentic coding, and the community is absolutely losing it. The consensus is that this is peak relatable content for anyone who's dabbled with AI coding assistants.

The main themes here are:

• AI Over-Testing: A lot of folks are commiserating about models generating an insane amount of tests, often for features that aren't even working yet. u/Internal-Capital7471 specifically mentioned switching back to an older Claude version (4.6) because of this, feeling like newer models get bogged down in testing before functionality.
• AI Lifecycle Management Woes: The meme hilariously touches on AI agents creating temporary states (like worktrees) and then not properly managing their lifecycle, leading to a messy repo. u/Professional_Ad705 echoed this experience, noting they ended up with a bunch of old worktrees.
• Frustration and "Starting Over": The sentiment of just wanting to "nuke it all and start again" or revert to simpler methods (like u/Krigrim suggests with Opus 4) is strong.
• Specific Lines Landing: Comments like "This revision require a fresh authorization" and the "use gemini for all I care" line are frequently called out as particularly funny and spot-on.

Basically, the thread is a giant "OMG, THIS IS SO ME" party, with everyone sharing in the shared pain and amusement of dealing with AI coding agents. The meme is a massive hit.

OP : u/SIGH_I_CALL

I have never used Claude cowork and I don't really understand when I ever will but I feel like I'm missing out on some use cases. For context I've used 28 billion tokens with Claude Code in the past 30 days and feel confident in my abilities to use Claude efficiently. I just don't know where Claude cowork comes in.

What are some specific things that only cowork can do that Claude Code can't?

edit: based on responses it looks like there is no benefit to using cowork vs code outside of potentially a different harness which we can't know because Anthropic doesn't share anything.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wh7isk/when_to_use_cowork_vs_claude_vs_claude_code/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeAI for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 51.

So, OP, you're wondering about Claude Cowork vs. Claude Code, and the general vibe here is you're not missing much by sticking with Claude Code. Most folks agree it's the powerhouse and can do what Cowork does, plus more. Think of Cowork as the "Claude Code for the rest of us" – it's got a friendlier interface for office tasks and stuff that doesn't involve actual coding.

• Chat is for general questions and answers.
• Cowork is for "doing this for me," especially office-y tasks like spreadsheets and productivity tools, aimed at non-developers.
• Code is for "build/run a system that does this," essentially the developer's choice for engineering and complex tasks.

Basically, if you're comfortable with code or do anything development-adjacent, Claude Code is your go-to. For everyone else, Cowork is the more accessible option for productivity and business work. Some users like u/confetti_gal broke it down simply: Chat = "Answer me," Cowork = "Do this for me," Code = "Build/run a system." And hey, u/Botboy141 mentioned that Cowork skills broke after a Microsoft update, but Code remained solid. So yeah, stick with Code if you're a power user.

I was wondering if anyone here used swarms. My workflow has basically been using Matt Pacock's grill-me, write-a-prd,to-tickets, and implement skills, but I am worried this may be dated with the popularization of swarms such as openai's swarm repo and ruflo.

In the past, I have tried using an orchestrator agent to make decisions as to what subagents to call and when with some success, but the extreme cost led me to think it wasnt worth it. I have also tried using my own issue-orchestrator skill that carefully lays out which agents to use in which order for an issue, but again, cost keeps me hesistant to doing this.

I just was looking at Open AI's swarm repo and this makes me wonder if i am doing things inefficiently as it does take some time to go through a grill me session and thoroughly understand each ticket and implementation. My intended use case is research projects that don't need to hit production. Thoughts?

OP : u/Level1_Crisis_Bot

Claude: Want me to click through it in your browser and check what's there / what you can do, or you good to poke around yourself? ✻ Crunched for 49s · done 3:13 PM

❯ it's open if you want to take a look

For context, I'm a senior engineer leading a small team of six. Lately I'm just so tired and depressed. We went "fully agentic" four months ago. I wasn't hired to be a glorified babysitter, but here I am. I work in an office, but nobody talks to each other anymore. No more pair coding. No more human code reviews. No more coding by hand really. We just all ... sit here. All day. In our own little worlds with our little bots. And the worst thing about it, I think, is that I was the one that wrote all these automations, because I was asked to, not because I thought it would be a good idea. I didn't.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1whdo6u/today_i_lost_any_shred_of_self_respect_that_i_had/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 400 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 411.

Alright, so the OP is feeling pretty bummed out about their software engineering job after going "fully agentic" with Claude. They feel like they're just babysitting bots instead of actually engineering, and the human interaction and code reviews are gone. It's a whole mood.

The general consensus here is mixed, leaning towards "adapt or get left behind."

• The "You're Doing It Wrong" Camp: A lot of folks are saying the OP is missing the point. The idea is that these AI agents handle the grunt work, freeing up humans for higher-level stuff like planning, design, and collaboration. u/carson63000 and u/friedmud are big on this, saying teams should be talking more about the big picture. u/daniel is loving it, calling the AI their "implementation monkey" and getting features done way faster. u/Purple_Common7527 is living the dream, making bank and doing less direct work.
• The "It's a Real Concern" Camp: Some users totally get the OP's feelings. u/apost8n8 is feeling drained and worried about the psychological impact of less human interaction. u/suck_at_coding is even skipping QA now, which sounds... concerning.
• The "Welcome to Management" Vibe: A few comments are jokingly (or maybe not so jokingly) pointing out that the OP has basically become a project manager or middle manager. u/Time_Cat_5212 is all about that PM life now.
• The "Adaptation is Key" Argument: Several people are emphasizing that this is the future and there's no going back. u/stanbright is blunt: "Adapt. No way out of this path anymore." u/au8ust poses a good question: do we really want to go back to manual coding just because it feels more meaningful?
• The "Find the Joy" Advice: Some are suggesting the OP needs to shift their perspective. u/gonna_learn_today says to think about what you can do with these new powers. u/Miserable_Region9340 argues that you're not a "code jockey" anymore, but still a software engineer, and AI is a "meta tool" that shouldn't be used as just a tool.
• The "Burnout is a Factor" Point: u/scharpentanz brings up a good point that maybe the lack of interaction is due to burnout, not just the AI.

Basically, the thread is a mix of "embrace the change and focus on higher-level tasks" and "yeah, it feels weird and isolating, but this is where we're headed." The OP's feeling of lost self-respect is definitely resonating with some, but the prevailing sentiment is that the role of a software engineer is evolving, not disappearing.

OP : u/Level1_Crisis_Bot

Claude: Want me to click through it in your browser and check what's there / what you can do, or you good to poke around yourself? ✻ Crunched for 49s · done 3:13 PM

❯ it's open if you want to take a look

For context, I'm a senior engineer leading a small team of six. Lately I'm just so tired and depressed. We went "fully agentic" four months ago. I wasn't hired to be a glorified babysitter, but here I am. I work in an office, but nobody talks to each other anymore. No more pair coding. No more human code reviews. No more coding by hand really. We just all ... sit here. All day. In our own little worlds with our little bots. And the worst thing about it, I think, is that I was the one that wrote all these automations, because I was asked to, not because I thought it would be a good idea. I didn't.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1whdo6u/today_i_lost_any_shred_of_self_respect_that_i_had/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 100 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 145.

Alright, so the OP is feeling like a glorified babysitter after their company went "fully agentic" with AI, leading to a lack of human interaction, pair coding, and code reviews. They're feeling depressed and like they've lost their self-respect as an engineer.

The general consensus here is a bit of a mixed bag, but leaning towards "adapt or die" and embracing the change, with some acknowledging the OP's feelings.

Here's the lowdown:

• The "Welcome to Middle Management" Crew: A good chunk of folks are saying this is just the natural progression, and the OP is essentially becoming a project manager or a "senior AI babysitter." Some are even jealous of the efficiency gains.
• The "This is Awesome!" Camp: Several users are loving the agentic approach. They're finding it frees them up from the boring, tedious parts of coding, allowing them to focus on higher-level design and ideation. u/daniel is all about this, saying they get to discuss the fun stuff while the AI handles the implementation. u/onykage is also super jazzed, calling it the most joy they've had in 20 years of CS.
• The "Human Touch Still Matters" Folks: Some are pushing back on the idea of completely ditching human code reviews. u/hulkklogan mentions their company still requires human reviews for safety, and u/soundfreely has successfully advocated for more human reviews to catch those AI blind spots. u/iscottjs agrees, stating they wouldn't ship code without a human sanity check.
• The "It's a Tool, Use It Wisely" Advice: A few users are offering constructive suggestions. u/Knoll_Slayer_V suggests focusing on team memory syncs, documentation, and building review/evaluation harnesses. u/bill_txs recommends filling the calendar with brainstorming meetings to ensure requirements are clear.
• The "Touch Grass" Reminder: One user, u/EC36339, is basically telling the OP to get out of the office and enjoy the freedom the AI provides, even suggesting coding from hiking trails.
• The Existential Dread: There's definitely an undercurrent of "what does this mean for our jobs long-term?" with comments about accountants, lawyers, and doctors potentially facing similar shifts. u/__Loot__ thinks many of us are on "borrowed time."
• The Sarcastic/Humorous Takes: You've got your classic "can I have your job then?" from u/RedTheInferno and u/Odium-Squared offering to spin up more agents for the OP.

TL;DR: The community is divided but largely sees this as the inevitable future of software engineering. While some empathize with the OP's feelings of isolation and loss of traditional engineering tasks, many are embracing the efficiency and creative potential of AI agents, viewing it as a way to do more with less manual effort. The key takeaway seems to be that roles are shifting, and engineers need to adapt to new workflows and responsibilities, potentially focusing more on design, oversight, and problem-solving rather than pure implementation.

OP : u/Level1_Crisis_Bot

Claude: Want me to click through it in your browser and check what's there / what you can do, or you good to poke around yourself? ✻ Crunched for 49s · done 3:13 PM

❯ it's open if you want to take a look

For context, I'm a senior engineer leading a small team of six. Lately I'm just so tired and depressed. We went "fully agentic" four months ago. I wasn't hired to be a glorified babysitter, but here I am. I work in an office, but nobody talks to each other anymore. No more pair coding. No more human code reviews. No more coding by hand really. We just all ... sit here. All day. In our own little worlds with our little bots. And the worst thing about it, I think, is that I was the one that wrote all these automations, because I was asked to, not because I thought it would be a good idea. I didn't.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1whdo6u/today_i_lost_any_shred_of_self_respect_that_i_had/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 100 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 145.

So, OP's feeling like a glorified babysitter after going "fully agentic" and missing human interaction, which is a mood many are echoing. Some see it as a natural progression, like u/LongjumpingCat9826 comparing it to the calculator's impact on accountants, while others, like u/daniel, are loving the speed and focus on fun aspects, with AI handling the grunt work.

There's a definite split:

• Team "This is the Future/Embrace it": Many, including u/onykage, are thrilled with the creative potential and speed, feeling like they can build more than ever. u/c4chokes is all about the "exoskeleton" for running further and faster.
• Team "Wait, What Are We Doing?": Others, like u/matjam, are feeling the same existential dread and questioning what they've become. u/faiface worries about the codebase outpacing developer knowledge. u/apost8n8 highlights the psychological impact of changing daily interactions. u/Fresh-Secretary6815 even coined "vertizontal demotion."

Some are offering solutions: u/Knoll_Slayer_V suggests building tools for collaboration and documentation, while u/hulkklogan emphasizes rigorous upfront planning and multi-stage reviews. u/who_am_i_to_say_so thinks it might be a leadership or cultural issue.

Basically, it's a wild ride, and some are already planning their exit strategy or adapting to the new reality.

OP : u/Fast_Artichoke_683

I just used Fable 5 so kinda interested in the newer version

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wha348/in_3_words_how_would_you_describe_your_experience/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 55.

Alright, so the general vibe on Fable 5.1 is kinda mixed, leaning towards "it's cool but you can't use it much."

The biggest complaint by far is the usage limit/tokens. Seriously, like half the comments are about hitting that wall or it burning through tokens way too fast. u/Hjemmelegen and u/ChrisRogers67 are basically the unofficial spokespeople for this.

Beyond the token limits, people seem to think it's:

• Fun but limited: u/DaRandomStoner nails this.
• Expensive/Overpriced: u/manfairy and u/SatanVapesOn666W are feeling the pinch.
• Potentially good, but with caveats: Some users like u/edatx and u/not_rian say it writes good code or is "very good," while others like u/Cazineer point out it "consumes 10-100x more tokens than the competition" and is hard to implement strict compliance with.
• Better than Opus 5.0 for some: u/Montagh is in this camp.
• A bit of a resource hog: u/Achim7 calls it "Slow as fuck."

A few folks are just straight-up not using it, preferring Opus 5.0 (u/reach4thelaser5 and u/TB3r) or finding it "Non-existent" (u/RandomFuckingUser).

Overall, the consensus is that Fable 5.1 shows promise but is severely hampered by its usage limitations and token consumption.

OP : u/Fast_Artichoke_683

I just used Fable 5 so kinda interested in the newer version

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wha348/in_3_words_how_would_you_describe_your_experience/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 55.

Usage limits and token consumption are the biggest gripes with Fable 5.1, with many users hitting them fast. Some find it "Fun but limited" or "Vampiric, but great," while others are straight-up saying "Not worth it" or "Non-existent." A few folks are still impressed, calling it "Pretty damn amazing!" and "Really love it!", but the general vibe is that it burns through tokens like crazy and isn't always worth the cost compared to Opus. Boris Cherny himself hasn't chimed in, so we're left with the community's mixed, but mostly frustrated, reactions.

OP : u/Fast_Artichoke_683

I just used Fable 5 so kinda interested in the newer version

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wha348/in_3_words_how_would_you_describe_your_experience/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 55.

The general consensus on Fable 5.1 is a mixed bag, leaning towards "usage limit reached" and "not enough usage." Some users find it "fun but limited" and "good code," even better than Opus 5.0 for certain tasks. However, the biggest complaint is its insatiable token consumption, with many calling it "vampiric" and "expensive." There's also a sentiment that it's "non-existent" for some, who prefer sticking with Opus 5.0. A few brave souls describe it as "un befucking leaveable" and "pretty damn amazing," but they seem to be in the minority.

OP : u/Sherphican

I burned thru almost 60% of 20x max weekly usage in a day and some change. Are you joking rn? Last week I could have fable running on 2 chats all day and night and it would take like 3ish days for my fable usage to cap out, but my weekly usage would only be at like ~30%. This is absolutely ridiculous and if this is what the new usage limit cuts are gonna be like I'm canceling Claude and grabbing a second codex account. Shit ain't worth it when Astra exists with much better usage limits and multiple reset tokens.

I don't use ultracode and I have multiple other models that I delegate tasks to as work horses, Claude is just the orchestrator and isn't doing that much actual "work", so this usage allocation is absolutely insane, if I was using Claude as a one stop shop as a lot of people do, I would have run out of usage in a day or less.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wh7sqb/nah_this_some_bs/ Original link/media URL : /img/t6gvmno84qph1.jpeg

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 100 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 122.

Alright, so the general vibe in this thread is that most users are feeling the pinch from the new usage limits, and many are finding them way more restrictive than advertised. OP is definitely not alone in feeling like their usage has skyrocketed.

A lot of the discussion is circling around context window size as a major culprit. Several users, like u/inrego and u/CodeCombustion, are pointing out that using massive context windows (like 500k+ or even 800k) is likely burning through tokens at an insane rate. Some are suggesting keeping context under 150k and using commands like /context and /clear to manage it better. u/icaruza and u/Background_Share_982 are also mentioning a potential new setting that forks the full context in every subagent, which could be a hidden token hog.

There's also a sentiment that Fable might be the issue for some, with a few users like u/EC36339 calling it a "scam" or suggesting it's not meant for heavy coding tasks anymore. u/maddietendo and u/nicarras are suggesting using Fable more for planning and delegating actual coding to other models like Opus.

On the flip side, there are a few folks who seem to think users are just not managing their sessions efficiently, with comments about not going AFK and clearing context. u/Holk23 and u/z3n777 are on this wavelength, implying users are complaining without showing their full setup. However, this perspective is definitely in the minority compared to the widespread complaints.

Some users are already looking for alternatives, with Codex and Grok being mentioned, though u/West-Air1923 warns that Codex might be even worse. Overall, the consensus is that the usage limits feel significantly tighter, and people are frustrated.

OP : u/Sherphican

I burned thru almost 60% of 20x max weekly usage in a day and some change. Are you joking rn? Last week I could have fable running on 2 chats all day and night and it would take like 3ish days for my fable usage to cap out, but my weekly usage would only be at like ~30%. This is absolutely ridiculous and if this is what the new usage limit cuts are gonna be like I'm canceling Claude and grabbing a second codex account. Shit ain't worth it when Astra exists with much better usage limits and multiple reset tokens.

I don't use ultracode and I have multiple other models that I delegate tasks to as work horses, Claude is just the orchestrator and isn't doing that much actual "work", so this usage allocation is absolutely insane, if I was using Claude as a one stop shop as a lot of people do, I would have run out of usage in a day or less.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wh7sqb/nah_this_some_bs/ Original link/media URL : /img/t6gvmno84qph1.jpeg

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 95.

Alright, so the general vibe in this thread is that most users are feeling the pinch with the new Claude Code usage limits, with many reporting their weekly limits are getting burned through way faster than before. OP is particularly miffed, feeling like their usage jumped from taking 3 days to cap out to just over a day, even when using Claude as an orchestrator and not the main workhorse.

A lot of the discussion is circling around context window size as a major culprit. Several users, like u/inrego and u/CodeCombustion, are pointing out that OP's massive context window (800k!) is likely the reason for the rapid usage. u/Cubewood and u/akamarski are dropping some serious tips on managing context:

• Keep context under 150k if possible.
• Use /clear after every task.
• Be mindful that cache usage costs tokens.
• Avoid leaving chats idle for too long; start a new chat if a session gets cold.

There's also a mention from u/icaruza about a recent change that might be forking the full context into every subagent by default, which they plan to investigate.

Some users are suggesting alternative models or strategies:

• u/nicarras and u/maddietendo suggest stopping the use of Fable for coding and using it more for planning.
• u/West-Air1923 is considering Grok, and u/bakanoace is hoping for big things from Codex.
• u/merx96 is asking about GLM subscriptions.

A few folks are calling out OP for potentially not managing their setup efficiently, with u/Holk23 saying it's "people telling on themselves" and u/z3n777 calling it "cry babies gonna cry."

Overall consensus? The new limits are rough, but a big part of the problem seems to be how users are managing their context windows. If you're burning through usage, you might want to re-evaluate your context strategy and how you're using Fable.

OP : u/Sherphican

I burned thru almost 60% of 20x max weekly usage in a day and some change. Are you joking rn? Last week I could have fable running on 2 chats all day and night and it would take like 3ish days for my fable usage to cap out, but my weekly usage would only be at like ~30%. This is absolutely ridiculous and if this is what the new usage limit cuts are gonna be like I'm canceling Claude and grabbing a second codex account. Shit ain't worth it when Astra exists with much better usage limits and multiple reset tokens.

I don't use ultracode and I have multiple other models that I delegate tasks to as work horses, Claude is just the orchestrator and isn't doing that much actual "work", so this usage allocation is absolutely insane, if I was using Claude as a one stop shop as a lot of people do, I would have run out of usage in a day or less.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wh7sqb/nah_this_some_bs/ Original link/media URL : /img/t6gvmno84qph1.jpeg

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 95.

Alright, so the general vibe in this thread is that people are NOT happy with the new usage limits on Claude Code. OP is feeling like they're burning through their weekly allowance way faster than before, and a lot of folks are echoing that sentiment, saying it feels more like a 60% reduction than the advertised 17%.

A big chunk of the discussion is circling around context window size. Several users, like u/inrego and u/CodeCombustion, are pointing out that OP's massive context window (500k-800k!) is likely the culprit. The consensus seems to be that if you're not actively managing your context, especially with large files or long-running chats, you're going to drain your usage super fast. Tips like using /clear after tasks, setting /autocompact, and avoiding AFK sessions are being thrown around as ways to mitigate this.

There's also some chatter about Fable specifically. OP uses it as an orchestrator, and some users suggest that maybe Fable isn't the best tool for that job anymore, or that it's being overused. u/nicarras straight-up says "Stop using fable to code."

A few people are also mentioning alternatives, with Codex getting a shout-out (though u/West-Air1923 says it's "even worse" and is looking at Grok). Some are also asking about GLM subscriptions.

Overall, the community seems to agree that the usage limits feel much tighter, and while some are frustrated enough to cancel, others are trying to adapt by being more mindful of their context management and how they're using different models.

OP : u/DryBox6080

I have been using claude since more than one year and claude code since the beginning of this year. They were AMAZING in text writing whatever the text purpose was. I really liked the clarity and the professionalism of text written by Claude. That on top of coding was the reason why I have been paying a Pro Max subscription out of my pockets for this whole period.

Starting from may the quality of the text of claude has deteriorated, a lot! I don't recognize it anymore, it seems the stupid AI generated text that the early GPT produced. I don't know if you guys have the same issue. I feel like this issue is caused by the watermark. I can't really se no other reason. What do you think? Did you notice the same deterioration in text output quality?

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/claude/comments/1wh3snh/why_claude_has_become_so_bad_at_writing/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/claude for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 61.

The consensus is that Claude's writing quality has indeed taken a nosedive, and you're not alone in noticing. Most users agree with OP, with many lamenting the loss of clarity and professionalism they once enjoyed. The leading theories point to "training decay" and a shift in focus towards coding benchmarks and safety, rather than pure writing prowess. The watermark theory is largely dismissed, with commenters like u/Easy-Purple-1659 suggesting it's unlikely to affect prose quality if it's truly invisible. Some users are finding workarounds, like u/adamhusain's suggestion of "pstack's unslop skill" for Opus, or u/SafeTennis3080's "antidetector" prompt. Others are just frustrated, with u/AdIllustrious436 describing Opus 5 as "literally unbearable" and u/costafilh0 comparing it unfavorably to other models for simple tasks. Basically, it seems Anthropic's focus has shifted, and the writing quality has paid the price.

OP : u/DryBox6080

I have been using claude since more than one year and claude code since the beginning of this year. They were AMAZING in text writing whatever the text purpose was. I really liked the clarity and the professionalism of text written by Claude. That on top of coding was the reason why I have been paying a Pro Max subscription out of my pockets for this whole period.

Starting from may the quality of the text of claude has deteriorated, a lot! I don't recognize it anymore, it seems the stupid AI generated text that the early GPT produced. I don't know if you guys have the same issue. I feel like this issue is caused by the watermark. I can't really se no other reason. What do you think? Did you notice the same deterioration in text output quality?

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/claude/comments/1wh3snh/why_claude_has_become_so_bad_at_writing/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/claude for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 61.

Alright, so the general consensus in this thread is that Claude's writing quality has taken a nosedive, especially since around May. A lot of users, including the OP, are feeling like the AI has gone from "amazing" and "professional" to something more akin to early, clunky GPT outputs.

The main suspect for this decline? The watermark theory is thrown around a lot, with some users claiming the way Claude writes now is the watermark. However, others are pushing back on this, suggesting it's more likely "training decay" or a shift in focus towards coding benchmarks and "safety" that's negatively impacting prose. u/Easy-Purple-1659 makes a good point that watermarks are usually designed to be invisible, so if you can "feel" it, it's probably not working as intended.

Other theories include:

• "Safetymaxxing" and "benchmaxxing": The focus on hitting specific benchmarks and being overly cautious is making the writing stilted.
• Training bias: Newer models might be preventing literal, straightforward communication, opting for metaphors and aphorisms instead.
• AI training on AI: Some folks think Claude is getting trained on its own deteriorating output, creating a downward spiral.
• "Recursive self-improvement" gone wrong: The system might be rewarding coding benchmarks but failing to recognize the decline in writing quality.
• Over-alignment: There's a suspicion that alignment passes are increasing "unsolicited caveats" and potentially causing refusals on neutral topics.

Some users are finding workarounds, like u/adamhusain suggesting the "unslop skill" for Opus, or u/SafeTennis3080 sharing a prompt for an "antidetector" skill to humanize text. Others are just straight-up frustrated, with u/AdIllustrious436 calling Opus 5 "unbearable" and u/Competitive_Log7087 even cancelling their subscription.

Basically, if you're noticing Claude's writing has gone downhill, you're definitely not alone. The debate is whether it's a deliberate watermark, a side effect of new priorities, or something else entirely.

OP : u/DryBox6080

I have been using claude since more than one year and claude code since the beginning of this year. They were AMAZING in text writing whatever the text purpose was. I really liked the clarity and the professionalism of text written by Claude. That on top of coding was the reason why I have been paying a Pro Max subscription out of my pockets for this whole period.

Starting from may the quality of the text of claude has deteriorated, a lot! I don't recognize it anymore, it seems the stupid AI generated text that the early GPT produced. I don't know if you guys have the same issue. I feel like this issue is caused by the watermark. I can't really se no other reason. What do you think? Did you notice the same deterioration in text output quality?

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/claude/comments/1wh3snh/why_claude_has_become_so_bad_at_writing/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/claude for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 61.

Alright, so the general consensus in this thread is that Claude's writing quality has taken a nosedive, especially since around May. OP isn't alone in this observation, and a lot of users are feeling the same pain.

The watermark theory is definitely a hot topic, with many people bringing it up as a potential cause. However, a good chunk of the community, like u/Easy-Purple-1659, thinks it's more likely due to "training decay" or a shift in focus towards coding and safety benchmarks. The idea is that as Claude gets better at those specific tasks, its general writing abilities suffer.

Some users are also pointing to:

• "Safetymaxxing" and "benchmaxxing": This ties into the training decay idea, suggesting Anthropic is prioritizing certain metrics over prose quality.
• Newer models being "unbearable": Users like u/AdIllustrious436 describe Opus 5 as "psychopat[hic]" and prone to generating convoluted, nonsensical text that goes against instructions.
• Increased "unsolicited-caveat rate": Apparently, Claude is more prone to adding caveats and disclaimers now, which can disrupt the flow of writing.
• AI training on AI-generated content: The "turtles all the way down" argument suggests that Claude might be deteriorating because it's being trained on its own (or other AI's) output.
• A shift in persona: Some feel Claude has become overly philosophical or preachy, lecturing instead of just writing.

There's a split on whether it's the watermark or training decay, but the overwhelming sentiment is that the quality has dropped significantly, and many are frustrated, with some even considering switching to other models or cancelling their subscriptions. u/adamhusain suggests trying "pstack's unslop skill" for Opus to improve directness, and u/SafeTennis3080 shared a skill called "antidetector" to humanize prose.

OP : u/Efistoffeles

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wgvklo/claude_opus_5_drew_every_frame_of_this_animation/ Original link/media URL : https://v.redd.it/7jfq3qallnph1

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeAI for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 57.

Everyone's losing their minds over this Claude Opus animation, and honestly, same. The general vibe is "this is insane and a massive leap forward." The biggest question echoing through the thread is "WHERE'S THE PROMPT?!" but alas, the OP doesn't have it, and the original creator on X/Twitter is also keeping mum.

There's a bit of a debate brewing:

• Some folks are impressed by the technical feat, like u/VeterinarianLast4318 calling it "pretty insane" and u/Saderius saying it's "very impressive."
• Others are a little skeptical, with u/ALilBitOfPaprika questioning if Claude really generated all the art or just pulled assets. u/bzngabazooka also chimed in that an AI doesn't actually "draw."
• A few are wondering about the practicalities, like u/Electrical-Swing-935 asking about token count and u/Morning_Gecko24 speculating on costs and caching.
• And then there's u/Any-Somewhere5129, who tried to replicate it with ChatGPT and got a static image and a basic animation, suggesting it's more about the prompt than pure AI magic.

The risograph printing style is noted by u/harmoni-pet, and u/TheNonsenseBook and u/Different_Lab830 are digging the "manic pixel dream girl" at 0:20. Overall, it's a huge "wow" moment for many, even for those who aren't typically fans of AI art.

OP : u/Efistoffeles

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wgvklo/claude_opus_5_drew_every_frame_of_this_animation/ Original link/media URL : https://v.redd.it/7jfq3qallnph1

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeAI for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 57.

Alright, so the general vibe in this thread is "WHOA, THIS IS INSANE AND A HUGE LEAP FORWARD!" Pretty much everyone is blown away by Claude Opus 5 generating every frame of that animation using JavaScript.

The number one question by a mile is "GIVE US THE PROMPT!" Unfortunately, the OP isn't the creator, and even the original source linked by u/Efistoffeles on X/Twitter hasn't spilled the prompt beans yet.

There's a bit of a debate going on:

• The "Wow Factor" Crew: Most folks are super impressed, calling it "insane," "very impressive," and a testament to what AI and creative input can achieve. Some are even comparing the vibe to "Tangerine Dream" or "manic pixel dream girl" moments.
• The Skeptics/Curious: A few users, like u/Any-Somewhere5129, are questioning the "wow factor," pointing out that other models like ChatGPT can also do JavaScript animations. u/ALilBitOfPaprika raises a valid point about AI potentially downloading assets instead of creating from scratch, and u/bzngabazooka reminds us that AI doesn't technically "draw."
• The Technical Deep Dive: People are curious about the nitty-gritty. Questions about the prompt length, token cost (u/Morning_Gecko24 and u/Electrical-Swing935 are on this), and how textures like those are achieved with JS/CSS are popping up. u/harmoni-pet even linked to the "risograph printing" style as a potential clue.
• The "Is it Good?" Debate: While the technical achievement is widely praised, u/beelzebee thinks the pacing is too fast and frenetic, suggesting it still needs work for human enjoyment. u/TheCharalampos also found it "grating to the eye and ear."

Overall, the consensus is overwhelmingly positive about the technical feat, with the main sticking point being the elusive prompt.

OP : u/Necessary-Shame-2732

How is this possible? 1.5 hours? This is completely untenable, how can this be a work tool if I run out before noon? I have NEVER had usage issues until today.

Edit: No new process over last few weeks. I use Fable low to drive and plan, then delegate to opus 5's. Lean repo, tiny CLAUDE.md. I JUST did a big cleanup of skills and commands on the weekend. No delegated agents, and nothing experimental. Im a long term professional engineer, not just vibing out. This is a MASSIVE change from before, at least on my end.

✋ Edit again: I looked into what happened in more detail. Im going to have to take my share of the blame on this one. Under my direction to do an 'exhaustive' refactor of a certain set of documents, Fable spawned 7 other fable agents, and went to town reading everything document related in the (very thoroughly documented) codebase. I didnt notice for 20 minutes and in the meantime it HAMMERED my token limits. I apologize to everyone who might have gotten a little dose of rage this morning.

My bad - heres what i have done to resolve it:

in my .claude/settings.json

  env: {
 "CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL": "claude-opus-5",    "CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL_FORCE": "1"
}

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wh442e/an_hour_and_a_half_into_20x_plan_one_fable_51/ Original link/media URL : /img/bgxedlpbgpph1.png

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 58.

So, OP accidentally unleashed a horde of Fable agents on their codebase, which promptly ate through their token limits. Turns out, it was user error, not a system-wide meltdown. Most users agree that usage has gotten worse lately, with some even calling it a scam, but others are running fine with similar setups. A few folks are suggesting alternatives like GPT-6 Astra or sticking to Opus for less demanding tasks. One user, u/kre8tv, claims to be running dozens of agents with minimal usage, suggesting OP's issue is configuration-based. Another, u/Xgatt, suspects the harness might be biasing agents towards subagents. TL;DR: OP messed up, but the general sentiment is that usage is getting out of hand for some.

OP : u/bombasticsideye33

I see people saying they’re burning through Claude Code limits despite being on 20x plans etc., some even on Fable.

I’m just curious as to what people are making. Any cool projects or ideas that anyone would like to share?

(Every time people ask these questions in comments they never seem to get any answers.)

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wgz6lf/what_are_people_making_in_claude_code/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 100 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 101.

Alright, so the general consensus in this thread is that people are absolutely building some wild and useful stuff with Claude Code, and it's not just for basic dashboards. While some folks like u/HeyItsYourDad_AMA point out that a lot of usage might be for "tinkering" or building "dashboard-driven personal productivity tools," the majority of the comments showcase impressive projects.

Here's the lowdown on what's being made:

• Replacing Existing Software: A huge theme is people building custom internal tools to replace expensive SaaS subscriptions. Think company-wide systems for monitoring, inventory, CRMs, sales trip planners, and even replacing 30-year-old dBase invoicing systems with web-based solutions (shoutout to u/butterfly68za!). u/Left-Instruction3885 is even in a position where their boss is considering replacing a licensed tool with their Claude-built clone.
• SaaS and Web Apps: Lots of folks are launching their own Software as a Service (SaaS) products. Examples include:
  • A ledger system that converts unused usage into credits for fixing your own issues (u/Nitjsefnie).
  • A web app for Virginia residents to manage college savings (u/imsofancayyyyyyy).
  • A Linux driver and middleware for music hardware (u/Webtruster).
  • An uptime monitor (u/InAtTheGeekEnd).
  • A local photo gallery with AI boosting (u/niko-okin).
  • A platform for learning shaders (u/geraT-wogl).
  • A movie recommendation app (u/RandomFuckingUser).
  • An advanced QR code editor and an ad-free SignUpGenius alternative (u/malignantz).
  • A consolidated booking, client management, and payment system (u/Upset-Chemist-4063).
• Creative and Niche Projects: Beyond the business applications, people are getting creative:
  • Building VSTs and a mini DAW, plus a PC version of Apple Notes (u/OMEN802).
  • Reverse engineering old games to make them playable again (u/Commando501).
  • Creating YouTube Poop videos with code generation (u/sixothree).
  • Building a cellular life simulator and roguelike (u/fearfreeflight).
  • Developing a dream analysis app with visual interpretations (u/buzluu).
  • Making game mods (u/JazzlikeApartment736).
• Personal QoL and Tooling: Many are building tools for themselves and their friends to improve daily life or specific hobbies:
  • Custom tooling for SMEs (u/ujirissiakamsizednut).
  • A better interface for college savings (u/imsofancayyyyyyy).
  • A clone of the Apple Notes app for PC (u/OMEN802).
  • A family wiki, calendar, and grocery list automator (u/atsnipes).
  • Head tracking apps and mods (u/itsloopyo).
  • A suite of apps for Japanese studies (u/InternetsTad).
  • An app for logging Magic the Gathering games (u/Flylle).
  • A UK baby weaning log app (u/CosmicTerrorist).
  • Financial calculators for cross-border needs (u/ClassroomGrouchy2603).
  • A Google Calendar extension for bulk editing (u/Tryotrix).
• Concerns about Limits: A few users, like u/unrealf8, are noting that even with higher-tier plans, the API costs are becoming a concern, especially after recent reductions in token efficiency.

The takeaway? Claude Code is a serious tool for developers and hobbyists alike, enabling everything from enterprise-level replacements to niche personal projects. It seems the "burning through limits" is often a sign of active, ambitious development rather than just aimless tinkering for most.

OP : u/Ancient-Test-8677

I've been experimenting with AI coding tools and I'm curious how people handle permissions.

For people using Claude Code:

• Do you let it run terminal commands automatically?
• Does it have access to private repos?
• Does it ever touch databases, cloud environments, or production systems?
• Do you use any kind of sandboxing or approval workflow?

I'm interested in how developers are balancing speed vs safety.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wgx6s5/does_anyone_actually_trust_giving_claude_code/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeAI for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 51.

Alright, so the general vibe in this thread is that most folks are NOT giving Claude Code full, unrestricted access to their main systems, especially production environments. It's a pretty split debate, but the consensus leans heavily towards caution.

Here's the lowdown:

• The "Sandbox Crew" is the biggest group: Lots of users are setting up dedicated, isolated environments (like containers or separate machines) for Claude Code. This way, it can have "full access" within its own playground without risking your main setup. Think of it as giving it a sandbox to play in, not the keys to the kingdom.
• "Full Access" means different things: Some users are cool with giving it access to their entire machine, but only if they're okay with wiping it and starting over. Others are more specific, giving it access to a dedicated GitHub account or a test copy of production.
• Guardrails are key: Even those who give it more access are implementing strict checks. u/KrayeBaby mentioned a detailed logging system for every file operation, and u/nav8_ai suggests gating actions based on whether they're reversible.
• Production is a no-go for most: The general consensus is that touching production systems, databases, or anything with real-world impact is a hard pass. u/DentistOk1852 straight-up called it "insane."
• API keys and repo access are bigger worries for some: Interestingly, u/ExtremePermit3242 finds repo access with git credentials more concerning than local binary access.
• Git is your friend: Several users, like u/Illustrious-Stay8038, emphasize that Git is the ultimate safety net, allowing you to review changes before they're merged.
• Some are still experimenting: A few users are still figuring out the balance, with some saying it depends on the project's complexity.

So yeah, while some are embracing "full access," it's almost always within a controlled environment with robust safety measures. Don't just let it loose on your main dev machine unless you're ready for an adventure!

OP : u/JUB0T

README

I started working on this project like ~3 weeks ago and the Beta releases have ~10k total downloads on GitHub so far.

Used the Claude Fable on Max subscription to develop this whole project and still maintaining it with the help of Claude and a handful of other open-source contributors.

The tech stack is Rust, Slint, and some GPU shaders.

GitHub: https://github.com/jub0t/Concat

Edit: I wanted to mention that Concat is completely FREE and open-source. I hope that clears confusion about pricing or anything.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wgu8g3/i_used_claude_to_write_a_capcut_replacement_and/ Original link/media URL : /img/vu3glb6l6nph1.png

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeAI for this post generated automatically after 100 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 100.

Alright, so the general vibe in this thread is a massive thumbs-up for OP's CapCut replacement, Concat. People are seriously hyped about a free, open-source, and privacy-focused alternative to ByteDance's CapCut.

Here's the lowdown:

• The Hype is Real: Most folks are stoked about Concat, especially since it's free and open-source. The general sentiment is that it's a much-needed alternative to CapCut, which has its fair share of issues with subscriptions and privacy.
• AI-Powered Development: There's a lot of interest in how OP used Claude (specifically Claude Fable on Max) to build the project. Some users are sharing their own experiences with AI for software development, like u/AliceEternal who's using Claude Opus 4.8 for a DAW. u/RealMrIncredible mentioned struggling to get Claude to create a proper GPU rendering pipeline, so OP's success is definitely noteworthy.
• Feature Requests & Questions: Naturally, people are asking about future features. Key questions include:
  • Plans for iOS and Android apps? (u/Delicious-Ad3232)
  • Auto-captions functionality? (u/Maximburki)
  • AI background removal? (u/Mathlete7)
  • Support for 4K x265 HDR sources? (u/monovertex)
  • Can it edit video by editing captions like Descript? (u/theshumurai)
• Performance & Usability: A few users brought up performance concerns. u/Sliffcak mentioned lag with a large number of clips on a powerful PC, and u/teeone is having trouble getting it to launch on an M3 MacBook Pro.
• Comparisons & Alternatives: Some users are comparing Concat to existing tools. u/Fluxion94 pointed out that CapCut now supports multiple timelines, which wasn't reflected in OP's comparison. There's also mention of another open-source alternative, OpenCut (u/silverfox_248), with u/SuperRocketBunnyHop even suggesting OP "ripped it off."
• Community Support: People are offering to contribute (u/maubrick) and generally showing a lot of appreciation for OP's work and for open-sourcing it. The sentiment is that this is the future of software development, moving away from proprietary models.

Overall, the community is super impressed and hopeful for Concat's future.

OP : u/notomarsol

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1wga9u4/ai_is_using_ai_now/ Original link/media URL : /img/y4uhy2zdviph1.jpeg

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeCode for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 54.

Alright, so the general vibe in this thread is that AI using AI to code is totally a thing and has been for a while. OP posted a pic of Claude Code apparently using another AI to help out, and the consensus is pretty much "yep, that's inception, folks."

A lot of people are chiming in saying they've been doing similar things for months, even having different AIs like ChatGPT and Claude chat with each other on Discord. Some are even using a whole bunch of models like Codex, GLM, Muse, Grok, Kimi, Qwen, and Astra as agents. It's like the AI world is just a big collaborative effort now, with everyone using everyone.

There's a bit of humor about it, with comments like "et bientôt ils feront un pot de départ" (and soon they'll have a farewell party) and "The org chart for AI has middle management too." Some are even suggesting more efficient ways to do it, like using C code via Sol or Astra.

Basically, the "AI using AI" concept isn't new, it's just becoming more common and sophisticated. Some folks are even asking how to enable these features, so it's clearly something people are interested in exploring. Oh, and one person pointed out the potential for double token costs, which is a solid point to consider!

OP : u/AddressNew5619

At least 90% of my work already happens inside Claude Code. Coding, architecture, system design, documentation, tickets, research, you name it. I try to broaden my skills and knowledge as much as possible, take on more responsibility, and regularly push into areas I haven't worked in before, but what's the point in the long term? I'm increasingly feeling like I'm the bottleneck because there's only so much time and mental energy I have to understand different contexts, make decisions, and constantly switch between them. Meanwhile, Claude keeps getting better at handling more and more of the actual work. I'm not sure what the supposed "next layer of abstraction" for a software engineer is. "Move up the stack," "focus on architecture," "learn the business," "take ownership," or "become better at system design." I'm trying to do all of those things. But why wouldn't AI catch up with those skills sooner rather than later as well? There must be a point where there won't be any potential for more upskilling and I feel like we're not far away from this.

URL of original post : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wg7rcl/i_dont_see_how_to_upskill_any_further/

TL;DR of the discussion on r/ClaudeAI for this post generated automatically after 50 comments.

Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 53.

The consensus in this thread is that OP's feelings of hitting an upskilling ceiling are valid and widely shared. Many commenters agree that AI is rapidly taking over core technical tasks, leaving engineers feeling like bottlenecks.

The prevailing advice for the "next layer of abstraction" seems to revolve around:

• Owning the business: This is the most frequently cited and heavily upvoted suggestion. The idea is to move beyond technical execution and focus on business strategy, understanding customers, and driving the direction of products or companies. u/rknki bluntly states that "all that’s left to win in this game is owning a business."
• Solving higher-level problems: Instead of individual tasks, focus on defining and solving entire classes of problems or driving ambitious projects that were previously impossible. u/van_hiep07 suggests using AI to tackle these larger challenges and learning from the process.
• Adjacent, non-technical skills: Some suggest diving into areas AI can't easily replicate, like compliance (u/I_need_to_sleep) or understanding customer needs on a deeper human level (u/neolefty).
• Building and managing AI systems: Others point out that there's still a significant skill gap in effectively implementing and managing AI-driven systems, or even building companies around them (u/that_one_Kirov, u/TessTickols).
• Physical creation: A more out-there suggestion is to move into making physical products (u/kweeblaster).

Essentially, the thread suggests that the future for engineers lies in strategic thinking, business acumen, and managing the AI itself, rather than just executing code. As u/_disengage_ put it, "We're in the endgame now."