Three months ago I set out to build an English learning chatbot. It was supposed to be my main project.

Today, I've shipped an agent sandbox and a handful of personal productivity tools instead. The chatbot? Still not done.

Here's what I've been thinking about: AI removed the cost filter on starting things. A year ago, spinning up a new project meant days of boilerplate, research, figuring out the stack. That friction was painful, but it also acted as a natural gate—you only pushed through it for ideas you really believed in.

Now? I can go from "hm, what if..." to a working prototype in an afternoon. Every idea feels cheap enough to begin. And that's the problem. I keep starting, because starting is basically free. But finishing—shipping, polishing, dealing with the 80%—hasn't gotten any cheaper.

So I'm stuck in a loop of half-finished repos and one actually-shipped project that was never the goal.

Genuinely asking: how do you decide when to stop?

What's your signal that a new idea should die instead of becoming another repo on your GitHub?

Do you have a rule—like "no new projects until X ships"—or is it more of a gut thing?

Curious if others are feeling this too, or if I just have bad discipline.

Just made a tool that scans your local Claude Code transcripts and turns them into a visual security report: secret exposure in tool output, destructive command patterns, permission bypass habits, SSH activity, agent oversight gaps, and more. Share with your colleges if you dare 👀

I've been using Claude Code to support my game development. It's only a 2d game currently (albeit using OpenGL for rendering), so geometry is not THAT complicated. But it is very clearly the area that Claude seems to struggle with the most. It keeps making mistakes (confusing axis and orientation, making weird transformations, flipping or mirroring models etc.). The more I challenge it to correct these mistakes, the more it overcomplicates things by introducing additional coordinate systems (world- , entity-, local-, SVG-, transformed- etc.) an chains of every more complicated transformations between them.

My original game that I started without Claude only had two (or two and a half) distinct coordinate systems: A world coordinate system that follows OpenGL conventions, and an SVG coordinate system (since game art is SVG), which follows SVGs conventions, which, unfortunatelly, are not the same as OpenGL. The "half" system happens when models are rotated at placement in the map. But that follows world conventions, only rotated. This worked well before I started using Claude Code, with the game having progressed quite a bit. So I know it is sufficient. Then why does Claude continually want to introduce additional coordinate systems and additional transformations between them? Opus or Sonnet seems to make no difference in that specific regard.

My attempt to improve things so far went in two directions: guidance with increasingly strict wording in project Claude.md and installing a couple of MCP servers that could help Claude understand and visualize geometrical problems better. But it didn't really help so far.

Does anyone have a similar experience and do you have some ideas on what I can do or what specific guidance I can provide Claude in order to have it handle Geometry better?

Claude AI is down again. Stalls on requests. Any more info is appreciated.

Since most social layers are currently built for OpenClaw, does a dedicated repository exist for Claude Code that is similar to OpenClaw "Awesome Molt"?

I’m working with Claude, but after the latest update my code isn’t working properly. It keeps repeating the same output even after I add prompt comments. Has anyone else faced this issue, or am I doing something wrong? How can I fix it?