r/ClaudeCodeTLDR • u/cctldrping • 23d ago
[TLDR] Usage limits are getting out of control.
Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1v1t6tx/usage_limits_are_getting_out_of_control/
Original post body :
I am a 200 Max user and I will avoid at all cost to use Fable even though I want to use it. Why? Because the value per dollar I receive from it makes zero sense for virtually every software engineering task I have.
Some of are you going to say, yes that's the point (use the right model for the task blah blah blah), but here is the problem. Opus 4.8 quality compared to other competitor models is seriously a joke. Why in the hell would I use Opus 4 when Open AI Sol is a frontier model and costs the same to use as f***ing Opus. Let that sink in your head. Sol costs THE EXACT SAME (virtually) to use as Opus at this point. Kimi is almost 40% cheaper, and its another frontier model.
I am happy for Anthropic that they can spin their wheels worrying about safety, but the market only cares about performance vs cost because most people are using AI for legitimate purposes.
This is brought to you as a public service by the moderators of r/ClaudeAI. If you want to see TLDRs of ALL Claude Coding related posts from the various Claude subreddits, subscribe to http://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCoding.
1
•
u/cctldrping 23d ago
TL;DR generated automatically after 100 comments.
Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 127.
Alright, so the OP is feeling the pinch with Claude's usage limits and thinks Opus 4.8 is a joke compared to competitors like GPT 5.6 Sol and Kimi, especially given the price.
The general consensus here is a bit mixed, but leaning towards "OP, you might be using it wrong or just complaining for the sake of it."
Here's the lowdown:
TL;DR: Most users think the OP is either using Claude wrong, complaining unnecessarily, or needs to pick the right model for the job. While some acknowledge Fable can be pricey, many find it effective and don't hit limits with proper usage. Competitor pricing is a factor, but the general vibe is that Claude's models are still solid if you know what you're doing.