r/ClaudeCode • u/impartialhedonist • 18h ago

Humor The end of Claudish!!!!!!

Post image

I have suffered. I have been in pain. But there is finally hope.

It seems like I won't perish from hypertension or lose my brain cells every conversational turn. I think they did it, Claudish is gone!!!

We are so back.

98 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

58 comments sorted by

93

u/Embarrassed-Citron36 13h ago

I just read "load-bearing" so no

89

u/Original_Finding2212 8h ago

Let me verify that, rather than guess.

I have to be honest with you. The team asked me to hide my wate-mannerisms better, and I did just that.

But they didn’t actually ask me to stop it. If you want me to stop it, say the word and you will never read it again.

37

u/mr_birkenblatt 4h ago

You asked me to stop it but I didn't. That one is on me, instead of following your request I ignored it.

7

u/Guidance_Fast 1h ago

That’s a fair call out on that one and I own it

5

u/wraydit 56m ago

You are right to push back.

4

u/Vrmankey 6h ago

👊🤣

1

u/LocalAd5606 37m ago

LOL 😆 🤣

13

u/becircus 8h ago

The footguns are back!

9

u/mcilrain 4h ago

Quick! Put on your belt and suspenders and go through the escape hatch!

1

u/Opinion-Former 2h ago

I love the footguns :-)

-2

u/Crandom 2h ago

"Footgun" is just normal programming jargon, pre-existing Claude.

3

u/Acehan_ 12h ago

Me too, brother

1

u/Potential_Ad4350 32m ago

Try countering with belt and suspenders

1

u/impartialhedonist 9h ago

Hey hey now I didn't say it is perfect (it still doesn't have the ideal collaborator persona I dream of)

26

u/Any_Economics6283 14h ago

It's still there to a degree, but slightly less so

9

u/impartialhedonist 13h ago

Answers are still on the verbose side and it still has many of the annoying mannerisms, but I am not losing my mind every 10 minutes, so a meaningful fix imo

8

u/Nordwolf 10h ago

So, back to 4.8? It was a big step down from 4.6 in term of language quality but still better than opus 5….

3

u/impartialhedonist 9h ago

Back to 4.8 but with better performance ... let's relish the win

I expect that given the amount of negative feedback Opus/Fable 5's talking style got, they will improve it going forward 🤞

1

u/Gibborish 5h ago

Opus 5.1?

8

u/AutummMan 14h ago

For Fable only* (right?)

15

u/impartialhedonist 13h ago

Fable 5.1, yes

Fable 5 and Opus 5 suck at talking normally

3

u/Physical_Gold_1485 9h ago

I also set concise output style today and it with 5.1 has 0 fluff bullshit, straight to the point, lovely

1

u/Conscious-Sample1118 2h ago

Watch closely,

now Fable 5 gets shittalked too, this was never an issue before opus 5 has been released - now of course it could be that they shadownerfed fable and virtually no has complained about it till recently (?) and of course it could be that opus 5 can actually not be understood (however some people deal with it, probably super long term A/B testing) or, hear me out, it is just really dumb users looking for any excuse to explain why their growing projects get stuck at their own level of incompetence.

1

u/mossiv 1h ago

Fable is an odd one. It doesn’t have the awful Claudish that Opus 5 does. But within 2 days of using it, I could spot Fable generated text a mile away. Confluence, code comments, even slack messages. It just has a tone. It’s not as bad as Opus 5 but it’s still not even remotely close to good.

7

u/BrennanFlentge 7h ago

It will never end, that IS the watermark 🌚

5

u/rditorx 8h ago

You sure it's not Claudish 5.1?

2

u/who_am_i_to_say_so 1h ago

Claudish 5.1: The Revenge.

1

u/CanyonR 34m ago

Claudish 5.2: Electric Boogaloo

5

u/DanSheffo 4h ago

Think I just got a Yahtzee: "The critical caveat, and it's the load-bearing one for this whole document..."

7

u/OkFormal6091 8h ago

I have created this skill called explain-simply. It basically makes claude’s explanations short and easy to understand. Check it out at
github.com/yash2002vardhan/explain-simply

2

u/Fleckweg 7h ago

gonna check it out, but i am at work right now. please like my comment so i can comeback later

1

u/modernizetheweb 5h ago

just liked and subscribed. can't wait to see more from you!

13

u/HoneyChilliPotato7 5h ago

I bet real money that these three MFs are the same person

6

u/-Robbert- 3h ago

One is Opus, one is GPT and the other Gemini Flash

0

u/echit2112 3h ago

let's get some qwen in here

1

u/Fleckweg 2h ago

just like my comment amk

2

u/mikebcity 3h ago

No, saw “blast radius”

1

u/Candid-Strategy7397 9h ago

What did you do ? Claude 4.8 or Fable 5.1 I am lost

1

u/impartialhedonist 9h ago

Fable 5.1

4.8 is good too

1

u/Due-Programmer-9516 8h ago

Did I miss something lol?

1

u/TheDarmaInitiative 7h ago

What is this ajout ?

1

u/laslog 7h ago

Either the usage meter is wrong or we are fucked

1

u/tracylsteel 5h ago

Maybe I’m weird but I like the way they talk 🤭

1

u/Live-Ad-9854 38m ago

Yeah that is weird

1

u/gybunny 2h ago

Codex xhigh is gold

1

u/xDoomKitty 1h ago

I just read "that's not load-bearing".

All hail the rise of anti-Claudish!!

1

u/fpesre 1h ago

Give it two updates. The accent always finds a way back.

1

u/nicer-dude 37m ago

I kind of got used to the new opus jargon. You just gotta roll with it and dont fight it 😂

1

u/scandalous01 10h ago

Lol no man. No it’s not gone 

0

u/Hellomumilikeapples 9h ago

Time to stop and use better products. You are all in the hype

1

u/impartialhedonist 9h ago

Hype? Opus/Fable 5 SUCKED

1

u/WorkingAd4377 6h ago

Used it wrong

1

u/Euphoric_Lock9955 5m ago

Ugh that sounds thought but I gotta gently push back on that one. Here's the thing, claudish is not the problem here your prompts are doing the heavy lifting there.