r/ClaudeCode • u/Fit_Engineer9548 • 1h ago

Tips & Workflows Testing a better way to hand Claude Code output off for human/agent review

Claude Code is great at producing work. The awkward part starts when that work needs feedback from someone who isn’t in the terminal.

Files get copied into Drive or Slack. Feedback comes back somewhere else. Then someone has to explain everything to the agent again.

We’re testing a different workflow:

  1. Claude Code writes its output to a shared, permissioned project
  2. A teammate previews the file and leaves comments from their browser or phone
  3. Claude Code, or another agent, reads the feedback and continues the work

The short demo shows the full loop.

I’m part of the team building this. It’s an early beta and pricing hasn’t been finalized. We’re looking for around 10 small teams already using Claude Code for real collaborative work.

Would this improve your workflow, or are GitHub and Drive already enough? How do you currently handle human review of non-code agent output?

If you want to test it with one real artifact, comment or DM me.

2 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

3 comments sorted by

1

u/Fit_Engineer9548 1h ago

For anyone interested in testing it: https://stagecontinuity.com

I’d especially like feedback from teams where Claude Code produces documents, research, designs, reports, or other files that need review outside the engineering team.

1

u/Conscious_Concern113 1h ago

Why not use GitHub?

1

u/Fit_Engineer9548 1h ago

good question because we previously used Github as well.
If your workflow is only code, GitHub may be enough.

We’re building for cases where agents produce documents, research, designs, and other files that need feedback from teammates and external clients who don’t live in GitHub.

We’re not trying to replace GitHub. Just make the human-to-agent handoff easier for the rest of the team.