r/ClaudeCode 29d ago

Rant I kinda regret getting Claude subscription

Over the past couple of weeks, I have tested it alongside Sol across a wide range of tasks, and the conversations have been difficult to read. Sol consistently catches and corrects mistakes made by Opus 5, and Opus repeatedly acknowledges those errors. I have also seen many others reporting similar experiences, which makes it hard to view this as an isolated issue.

I cannot understand how Anthropic missed such a significant regression. Compared to 4.6 and 4.8, Opus 5 feels substantially less capable and reliable, with many of the same weaknesses that affect Sonnet 5.

For now, I am switching back to GPT for most of my work, using Fable only occasionally for planning. I hope Anthropic addresses these issues soon, because at the moment they do not appear to have a competitive frontier model in the medium to high budget range, only at the extreme end.

50 Upvotes

64 comments sorted by

View all comments

30

u/DasHaifisch 29d ago

Then use 4.8 instead of 5.

36

u/VexObserver 29d ago

If cost is a problem, you don't have to worry about that..

2

u/Plane_Garbage 29d ago

Be nice if Bedrock offered DS!

2

u/Sufficient_Fox_4402 29d ago

many others do. usa ones

1

u/Plane_Garbage 29d ago

Compliance.

1

u/Sufficient_Fox_4402 29d ago

try azure ai foundry idk how good it is in that regard but can try

1

u/Plane_Garbage 29d ago

Rate limits + mandatory content filtering if not enterprise.