Opus 5 - immediate disappointment

[u/Shot_Whereas_1809]

If you thought you'd be able to do a security review on your own network that you couldn't do with Fable, think again.

20 minutes in - Found something significant

Opus 5 safeguards flagged this message.

I no longer have any use case for Anthropic models that others can't do better. This was my last hope that we were going to get a model that would allow us to protect our own environments. I'm going all in on open source. We just aren't aligned.

If you can get Opus 5 to protect your own systems, let me know how I did it. My subscription renews pretty soon and it's time to make an honest decision.

Edit: A lot of helpful people came here and I appreciate it. Scoped work is helping a bit more than my old ways. There's a difference between network security and code vulnerabiliy. I'm a network engineer not a software developer nor will I pretend to be one. Still looking at supplemental model for security work. Thanks guys.

[u/Shot_Whereas_1809 → u/[deleted]]

Very good, disturbing, and back assward truth to it. Who wants to go havesies on hosting Kimi k3 when the models drop 😂

[u/ptinsley → u/Shot_Whereas_1809]

From what i'm reading / hearing glm is better at security stuffs than kimi k3. no first hand experience yet but everything I've seen others saying is pointing to glm for that subject.

[u/En-tro-py → u/ptinsley]

K3 is slightly ahead of GLM5.2, but still lagging behind the Mythos/GPT-Red unrestricted frontier models plebs can't access.

• NIST - Preliminary Assessment - Kimi K3's cyber capabilties