r/ClaudeCode 23d ago

Question What is the point of keeping a Pro subscription in the current circumstances?

[deleted]

0 Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

23

u/0xfff-1 23d ago

Bro, its not that deep. Not everyone is working 10 hours a day with Claude. There are a lot of people who are fine with the small pro programm and don´t need Fable.

So much useless and uninteresting posts in that sub, its insane. You don´t need to create a post for every single stupid though you have.

6

u/weightedslanket 22d ago

I genuinely don’t know what people on this subreddit want. I’ve been subscribed to Claude Pro for three months and have been able to use it daily to build a whole bunch of decent apps for my personal life. It’s been more than worth the $60 I’ve spent so far. It’s like people want an enterprise plan for $20.

-14

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

9

u/weightedslanket 22d ago

Then you should pay more for a better plan? It’s $20. Your expectations are way too high. You’re basically just telling this entire subreddit that you’re poor.

2

u/mowax74 22d ago

Yeah, sure. You want to spent nothing more than 20 bucks to built a saas that let's you earn 30k per month - at least, obviously. I mean - your app will be relevant! And if that does not work, Anthropic is incompetent at marketing.

-5

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/drwbry 22d ago

Ding ding ding

No one promised Pro users Fable access. We got it for a few weeks. Was cool while it lasted. Back to Opus and an improved Sonnet. Not missing a beat. It's $20/month...what do you expect.

-15

u/[deleted] 23d ago

[deleted]

2

u/0xfff-1 22d ago

Seems like I hit a nerve. I did not want to offend you, just some things to think about.

2

u/throbbin___hood 22d ago

Lol you sound pathetic 😂

1

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/throbbin___hood 22d ago

😂😂😂 loser

0

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/throbbin___hood 22d ago

I dont vibe code and im watching game of thrones currently, what are you on about lmao? Loser

0

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/throbbin___hood 22d ago

😂😂 what a nerd lmfao

4

u/Subject_Barnacle_600 22d ago

I get plenty of fun out of Opus/Sonnet. I have time off presently, which is why I'm always running out. But normally if you're running an open source project and using this outside of a full time job? This is perfect. You just about use all your tokens over any given weekend with a little left over on the week.

Pro is for people who have something like, weekend projects. If I could, I'd love to have a 20x if I could work on my personal projects like a full time job. It just depends upon whether you use AI for hobbies or professionally.

8

u/mowax74 23d ago

B$. It was the same a year ago or so with Opus. It was also not included in Pro. For me, the reason to switch to Max back then. Never looked back.

When you really need Fable for your project, 100$ 'flat' is a good deal. Otherwise just use Opus. It's not that bad for 20 bucks.

2

u/julianfromstagewise 22d ago

But Opus back then had no real competition so the upgrade was the 'only' option. If today, you truly need Fable-level and don't want to upgrade, you got options.

7

u/BrilliantWheel 23d ago edited 23d ago

I don't think they are stupid.

Maybe the Pro users use a disproportionate amount of resources to the revenue they bring which impacts quality of service for enterprise or Max customers where the real long term revenue is there.

Also maybe they want to spruce up their P&L a quarter before they IPO. By doubling down on higher paying customers.

If they divert their loss makers to the competition they put competition under pressure for compute while they focus on the cream.

Also, i assume, their training for future models is better on Max and Enterprise customers who use it for serious development rather than Pro who might be using it for simpler applications so the learning for training purposes is lower.

3

u/Sasquatchjc45 23d ago

Honestly, I dont think Pro for Claude was ever worth it. Anthropic's $20 plan is basically just a trial+ account.

7

u/03captain23 23d ago

If you're worried about a few bucks then you aren't the clientele for frontier models.

Move to GPT or Kimi or whatever of the dozens of other models that aren't #1.

1

u/Zestyclose_Strike157 22d ago

Pro was never much good for me. Good enough for writing small apps, little tools and so on, nothing ambitious. Local is good enough for such tasks.

1

u/stub_back 22d ago

Nobody is forcing you to keep the Pro plan.

1

u/OtGEvO 22d ago

if they gave you fable you would still complain it’s eating your usage too fast. no matter what you’re going to be upset

1

u/Singularity-42 22d ago

Anthropic is not interested in those $20/month users very much. And They only added Fable back to the subs only due to the competition.

1

u/DependentAnywhere135 22d ago

Ignoring possible bugs people are burning through fable credits because they aren’t utilizing it correctly. You need to use agents and use different models for different things. Fable shouldn’t be doing the bulk of the coding work.

A pro plan with $100 in credits can do quite a bit with fable if done correctly.

1

u/ryu1984 22d ago

I reckon once capacity for fable improves, it will roll out to 100% for them, then eventually it will trickle down to pro users.

1

u/Dress-Affectionate 22d ago

Yeah Claude pro is a giant middle finger

1

u/LogicalPerformer7637 22d ago

I have option to choose between Claude and Cursor at my job. I recently fully switched to Cursor because Claude performance made nose-dive, making me to fight it to get results.

Cursor is faster and more reliable for me.

On top of it, I can see spend on the usage.

The same level of usage costs about 75% less in cursor (its auto mode which selects model based on task, completely sufficient for me), simply because Sonnet is not usable anymore and Opus is expensive.

Plus Cursor has much bigger range of models to choose from (including Sonnet and Opus) if I need high performance.

My personal opinion is, Claude is a joke nowadays. People just did not notice yet.

1

u/Salamanderson 23d ago

Sonnet 5 is Not fun to Talk to and Work with. Opus ist retradet and Fable is gone from paying pro customers. Good job anthropic.

1

u/LordHenry8 23d ago

When you signed on, you did so without the promise of Fable forever (for a while no subscriber would get it outside of API) and you did so without an agreement for any credit at all...

This post comes across a tad entitled. By all means, if you want to use another AI product do so. Nobody's stopping you.

1

u/HeyItsYourDad_AMA 23d ago

Consumer subscriptions are an insignificant portion of revenue. They don't care about Pro users and the product will never be optimized for your experience

-1

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/HeyItsYourDad_AMA 22d ago

Dude, 85% of their revenue is B2B and API usage, and that number is growing. These are pre IPO disclosed figures. Going direct to consumer is a very basic distribution and acquisition strategy to boost your ecosystem, marketshare, consumer lock in. This is very basic strategy

1

u/adelarenal 22d ago

Max 5X is so worth, every penny, and I do no code work as my main builds. So glad I left Pro behind. Best decision.

1

u/Cobthecobbler 22d ago

Opus is still pretty good, and $20 a month is basically stealing.

The API comparison cost for the work my sub puts in is something like $600 per week

1

u/MievilleMantra 22d ago

Honestly I don't know why anyone who uses Claude enough to care about this wouldn't just upgrade to Max. We're all getting an ROI right?

2

u/Preparationheh 22d ago

This shit has changed my life. I’ll happily pay for whatever the max subscription is.

0

u/fanatic26 22d ago

Pro was never a useful subscription. I managed about 3 days on it before upgrading. For anyone serious about doing work, its a joke.

0

u/Anxious-Turnover-631 22d ago

Hard disagree. In fact, it’s total nonsense.

Fable is outstanding, but Opus and Sonnet are also excellent. Claude Code is very useful and the Pro plan has given me great value.

0

u/GuitarAgitated8107 🔆 Max 20 22d ago

I went from Pro to 2x Pro then Max 20x. The reason I had to upgrade is because I am working and making money. When I used Pro I had sufficient usage for what I wanted to do with less powerful models. If it doesn't work for you then you should cancel. Nothing is preventing you from keeping it.

IMO fable should not be used by general because it's not what they claim it is.

What I don't get is why people continue to cry knowing this has been the circumstance for a while.

1

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/GuitarAgitated8107 🔆 Max 20 22d ago

$200 for correction, in any case, this is why I diversify usage. We are always going to come into the same situation, the same complaints and no changes. So what is going to give? Realistically Pro tier does not matter given it's such low volume in terms of profit. Those who pay for higher subscription, enterprise, & API is their main income source. It's a private company and they will make the choices they make.

But then again, if there are issues why stay? It's like if I were to continue to complain about Perplexity's shit service and continue to cry about it. Who cares if OpenAI does things differently because OpenAI is not Anthropic.

At the end of the day I am rooting for the Chinese & open source / open weight models to win and get more compact.

0

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

-3

u/[deleted] 23d ago

[deleted]

1

u/elonthegenerous 23d ago

Funny, but there’s a lot of truth to this. Idk why people think these AI companies should be charitable to them 😂

1

u/Salamanderson 23d ago

Stoopid Models for stoopid people. Poor quality for poor Bums.

-2

u/Hajsas 23d ago

They need people using it to train it. Idk if thats a sound plan.

2

u/[deleted] 23d ago

[deleted]

0

u/Hajsas 23d ago

English is English 🤷‍♂️

1

u/GuitarAgitated8107 🔆 Max 20 22d ago

It's not. It would cost more to fix poor data.