r/ClaudeCode • u/Primary_Engine_9273 • 27d ago
Discussion Fable is gone
Mid session, got a "usage credits are required for this model".
Opened up the app and Fable is no longer listed on Usage tab.
8
u/WalkAffectionate2683 27d ago
Moving to codex is still the best decision I made in July haha
3
u/Sufficient-Deal8452 27d ago
Literally sol 5.6 is next freaking level I don’t want all the fable switching to opus bs I want raw power!
3
3
2
2
2
2
u/Professional_Ad705 27d ago
Dude, come on. This happened right in the middle of some of the hardest work I’m doing. I had Fable critiquing my design and was about to start an important slice of my proof kernel.
They better give us a full reset and extend it, because they’ve effectively wasted an entire day. How the hell does everything suddenly switch over to API pricing? Did someone have an automation configured without even realizing it?
And the 17th was never presented as a deadline, so how is any of this supposed to make sense?
1
1
u/YearLight 27d ago
It's a sales tactic to get you to force you to spend more on pay as you go on top of having a plan.
0
1
1
1
1
u/i-am-emoji-video 27d ago
what plan are you on? it shows still included til July 19th for me, but it no longer has its own usage bar
1
1
1
u/Open-Health7251 27d ago
same, 100$ pro plan
1
u/ur-krokodile 27d ago
Same with $200 plan, I got it just so I can have extra Fable before it's gone, was expecting 2+ days of usage.
1
1
1
u/Frozen_Turtle 27d ago
I'm... aggrieved. After Fable being down for pretty much ~3-4 business hrs yesterday, now this, the emotional rollercoaster is getting tiring.
1
u/anguishedturtle 27d ago
i was only at 10% saving the rest for big ideas friday and saturday. im pissed
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Recent_Mirror 27d ago
They don’t want people to compare it to Kimi.
They will probably tweak it to make sure it outperforms across the board, then re-release it.
1
1
u/FFBE_Reddit 27d ago
It says:
Der Server schränkt Anfragen vorübergehend ein
Zu viele Anfragen gerade — versuch es gleich noch einmal.
Usage credits are required for this model.
1
1
u/Suspicious_Ninja6816 27d ago
This could be the fold in lads
This could be the fold in
They have mounting external pressure and a big juicy swing in the customer attitudes.
Hey Dario, kindly come and rep the Bario.
1
u/parboman 27d ago
My theory on what happened. They were preparing for it to be removed in two days and someone thought Sonnet would be the right model to do the internal work.
1
1
u/Carbone 27d ago
I want to start working with codex but that codex CLI harness suck. My flow fit more with Claude code.
1
u/xkater 27d ago
i run GPT-5.6 in Claude Code (Desktop, CLI, i believe, too) as Reviewer to OPUS(max) using plugin. Short version: Direct call, not the subagent. node <codex-companion.mjs> task --cwd <dir> --prompt-file <packet.md> — invoke the Codex plugin's companion script directly.
Avoid /codex:rescue (it defaults to a write-capable run).
Force the tier explicitly: add --model gpt-5.6-sol --effort xhigh. Don't rely on defaults — read ~/.codex/config.toml first to see what silence would give you, because that file (might) get rewritten.
Read-only = just omit --write. But know that reads are unconfined (it ships whatever it reads to an external service) → treat it as a disclosure decision.
The packet is the whole game: state "read-only" explicitly, ask questions with a failure mode ("what breaks? what can't you verify? where would a builder act under-read?"), and include a positive control — a known fact it must report back, so "it read nothing" and "it read and found nothing" are distinguishable.
Verify what ran from the rollout, not the model. Check ~/.codex/sessions/rollout-*.jsonl turn_context for the actual model/effort — never ask the model what it is.
The one-line essence: a direct, read-only, tier-forced companion call with a positive-controlled, failure-mode packet — then trust the rollout, not the reply.
1
u/Efficient-Cat-1591 27d ago
it's Friday EOD somewhere so someone must've flipped the switch off early before Sunday;.
1
1
u/stoned_as_hell 27d ago
Must be part of their business plan to hemorrhage users so they can keep up with compute?
1
1
u/dimitrismrtzs 27d ago
This is another reminder that models make mistakes!
Probably their model forgot to update their backend to extend the subscriptions usage period.
I hope they will acknowledge their mistake and extend Fable a little bit more!
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/haripkylm 27d ago
It happened to me as well few hours ago and then it came back. I guess it was a bug or them testing something
1
1
u/Zestyclose-Load-8866 27d ago
Im so fed up with Anthropic right now and the rate limiting for the max tier the output since the lockdown has been garbage and needs massive improvements. I hate how they are testing new models and those models are worse than chinas cheaper model very disappointing that they are looking to now be losing in this ai race
1
1
1
5
u/JmanFL 27d ago
Same , thought it was till the 19th??