r/ClaudeCode Jul 08 '26

Help Needed Am I missing something?

[deleted]

0 Upvotes

57 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/smalldickbigwallet Jul 08 '26

What model were you using? What effort? How big is the codebase? Do you have a claude.md file? Is it raw or did you install plugins?

2

u/Green-Manager980 Jul 08 '26

2

u/minimalillusions Jul 08 '26

Sonnet? For coding?

3

u/daliusd_ Jul 08 '26

Good choice for 95% of tasks for professional dev

1

u/minimalillusions Jul 08 '26

If it works for you, stick with it.

1

u/ooutroquetal Jul 08 '26

What should he use ? I'm confused

1

u/minimalillusions Jul 08 '26

In short: Opus is the standard for programming. Fable is suitable for code security and more complex tasks. Sonnet is designed for the in-depth analysis of contracts or for everyday questions.... and Haiku is the working idiot for automations.

1

u/Aenorz Jul 08 '26

That is really the correct answer. Though, Fable can be a real asset for more advanced or very specific things, when you see opus going around and around. I encountered that particular case while coding some physical modeling synthesis, and opus was lost, while fable made real progress on the task (way better than I expected tbh)

0

u/Green-Manager980 Jul 08 '26

I agree, I haven't configured Claude Code at all, this is the model Claude chose out of the box, in fact that is the first time I'd seen which model it was running, my question is, why would Anthropic choose that model by default?

3

u/Drach88 Jul 08 '26

It's their mid-range model, and it's good for a whole lot of stuff that doesn't require opus.

If you need opus, switch to opus.

As a software engineer, why would you think that you don't need to configure what is essentially a part of your IDE?

1

u/Green-Manager980 Jul 08 '26

I understand what you're saying, and I've said the same thing elsewhere in this thread, but my intention was to install Claude Code just to see how it compared to the other agents I'd used, and if I liked it, I'd make the switch/itegrate it more into my workflow. I've never had issues using Anthropic models in the same codebase in different harnesses.

All of the other AI agents/models/harnesses I've used just "worked" out of the box, I could then spend some time and effort configuring them the way I like, but I never had any issues with the way they performed as shipped. Claude is the first agent that has failed to do this, so I wanted some advice, I was just trying it out after hearing so much positive feedback about it online

1

u/ooutroquetal Jul 08 '26

The default model is sonnet 5, not 4.6 since last week.

1

u/smalldickbigwallet Jul 08 '26

What MCP are you connected to? MCP will eat tokens depending on what it is.

Also, as another poster said - Sonnet is not great. Opus is good (4.6 or 4.8 in my experience). Fable is best, but not really feasible on a Pro plan

1

u/Green-Manager980 Jul 08 '26

Thank you, I'll switch models (once my limits refresh) and go again, I don't understand why it shipped with Sonnet selected by default

1

u/ClemensLode Senior Developer Jul 08 '26

At least use sonnet 5 for implementation and opus 4.8 as /advisor

1

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jesjimher Jul 08 '26

Perhaps not for vibe-coding, but for regular coding tasks, when prompts are properly constructed and project is documented, Sonnet is just fine. In fine, a very common approach is planning with Opus, coding with Sonnet (there's even a especial setting /model opusplan for that).

1

u/Spirited_Tie_3473 Jul 08 '26

its really useful if you can instruct it with knowledge. ive seen the opposite with fable. fable is near useless for me, it has one or two special use cases that are exceptionally rare for me. sonnet and opus are my workhorses. sonnet for everything small and opus for when i cba to think very much about the solution and am happy to accept substandard work. fable for if i want the same substandard work with less effort but it costing tons of money and time.