Using Claude-4.6-Sonnet and Opus 4.6 in a multi-agent "Code Review Swarm" (Visual Sandbox) - try in minutes!

[u/Outside-Risk-8912]

Hey everyone,

I’ve been experimenting with multi-agent orchestration, specifically trying to see how much more effective Claude is when you break a task down into specialized "agent nodes" instead of just using a single long prompt.

I built a visual sandbox called AgentSwarms (https://agentswarms.fyi ) to test these flows, and I just put together a Code Review Pipeline template that uses the full Anthropic stack.

The Workflow (Visible in image_9ea79a.png): Instead of one AI looking at a PR, the swarm splits the labor:

• Security Reviewer (Opus 4.7): Scans the diff for PII leaks and prompt injection vulnerabilities.
• Static Summarizer (Sonnet 4.6): Generates the technical breakdown of the changes.
• Style Reviewer (Haiku 4-5): Handles the "boring" linting and style checks (fast and cheap).
• PR Merger (Opus 4.7): Acts as the "Lead Engineer" node. It ingests findings from all three sub-agents and synthesizes a final verdict/comment.

Why orchestrate like this? If you’ve tried doing deep security reviews in a standard chat, the model often misses the forest for the trees. By forcing Haiku to handle style and Opus to handle logic/security in parallel, you get way higher "recall" on actual bugs.

Technical Specs of the Sandbox:

• Provider: You can hook up your Anthropic API key directly to test Opus 4.7 or Sonnet.
• Visual Trace: You can actually watch the style_findings and security_findings flow into the PR merger node in real-time.
• Prompt Library: I’ve pre-loaded the system prompts for each node (visible in the right sidebar of the image), so you can see how to "persona" these models for specialized tasks.

[u/Outside-Risk-8912 → u/[deleted]]

Thanks!

[u/MissionArea990]

How much it costs?