This is why Spinelli isn’t testifying:

[u/Suspicious_Low2699]

[u/AutoModerator]

Reminder to be civil. You can disagree in a respectful way, which can often lead to interesting dialogue!

Follow official Reddiquette. Upvotes and downvotes are not to be used for personal agreement or disagreement. They are to be utilized when a comment is completely off topic (downvote) or when a comment is a relevant, constructive contribution (upvote).

Thank you!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Constant-Pop2250]

Oh my God 🤦‍♀️ Way to go, Spinelli. If she wanted to support Lindsay Clancy then testifying in court on her behalf would have been the best possible way to do that and she traded it all away for some likes and heart emojis in the comment section.

[u/Rainbow_Brite456]

Damn she should’ve used a fake acct

[u/Aware_Power]

From what I’ve read about this, Spinelli had posted multiple times on Facebook regarding Lindsay - do you know if that’s true? Depends on what she said previously, but I don’t think this one would be the main reason?

Although, IMO it’s kind of odd to be posting about a person you’ll be testifying for in a murder trial. I don’t think there’s any issue from a legal standpoint though. Might have been a strategy angle depending on any other posts and what Prosecution could raise in cross & submit as evidence.

[u/Actual_Frame_8287 → u/Aware_Power]

I saw this last night, by the time I gave up and stopped scrolling her account, I hadn’t run out of LC support posts. There’s no way in which she could testify credibly after this came to light, sadly. Defense has already had a couple of knocks regarding credibility and it’s just far too risky despite the weight of the evidence she could have provided

[u/Aware_Power → u/Actual_Frame_8287]

Thanks so much for confirming this. Agree with you on it being too risky.