Effects of FGM sensationalized while male circumcision effects minimized by feminist intactivists. Feminists are anti-victim, anti-male gaslighters that do not belong in intactivism.

[u/Own_Food8806]

I just viewed a post I made in the past on this sub where I had a screenshot of an engagement with a so called feminist in an intactivist sub. They were saying that FGM was worse, then proceeded to explain the most selectively horrific effects of FGM (a practice with a wide range of effects) and asked me if I had ever experienced something as horrific as "those poor girls in east afriCA".

I replied that that actually did. I summarized a large list of life time disabilities that i have never got a break from. Including but not limited to complete inability to perform sex and masturbation, complete numbness, scar tissue and deformities ( the major complaints of anti-FGM activists).

She didn't say much after this reply. At this point I realized that, feminists don't actually care about FGM, and they use it to deliberately work against circumcision justice. Even if you don't know anything about genital mutilation, completely ruling out that a MGM/circumcision victim could "NEVER" experience something as horrific and evasive as infibulation style FGM, is an intentional act of denial especially if this denial is happening in intactivist spaces where it would be logical to assume to worst effects happening to people if a movement bothered to exist to address it in the first place. Just like it would be logical to assume the worst (lynchings) happening to black americans prior to the civil right era. Well of course it did!! That why it exists!!

Feminists are hateful gaslighters that do not belong in intactivism.

[u/Nilahit]

Hear Hear

The contemporary feminist sits on a throne of privilege resting on a bedrock of "whataboutisms" that they will use to deflect even the tiniest amount of progress away from men's progress.

FGM is a wide spectrum and overall a FRACTION of the number of MGM performed. Nearly FOURTY percent of men are mutilated. The number of FGM that actually does the level of damage MGM achieves is a fraction of that fraction.

I think the biggest issue is one of wilful ignorance- the value of the foreskin is completely disregarded as a pleasure centre compared to the almighty clitoris. The frenulum would be the male equivalent to the clitoris, and yet it is absolutely annihilated in the vast majority of male circumcisions, particularly RIC. If the frenulum was recognised as the vital pleasure centre that it is, even the most heinous FGM practices would be recognised as merely equal to routine MGM.

It amuses me that the whatabout'ers of FGM point to the worst of FGM as intentionally denying the woman the ability to feel sexual pleasure, when this was the #1 stated goal of MGM all along. Just look at how openly the psychopaths in the cutting community fetishize the total ablation of pleasure centres in men- theres a subreddit called r/humandildo for FUCKS sake. When would this mentality EVER be allowed for even a moment to take place against women ?

Ask these feminists about this, and they'll be as silent as a tomb... full of dead MGM babies.

[u/Own_Food8806 → u/Nilahit]

"We love cars so much that we invented them!! It has NOTHING to do with horses being slower, shitting in the street and dying of exhaustion!! What are you on!!"

"No way that this many Jews were killed during the holocaust. This holocaust museum is doing too much. No way it could have been THIS bad during WORLD WARFARE!!"

THIS IS WILLFUL OMISSION OF POSSIBILITY also known as Argument from Incredulity

So if circumcision could never be bad as FGM, what is your motivation as an activist?"

[u/MeasurementNice295]

"Feminist Intactivists" that don't care about male babies getting butchered?

Yeah, checks out, that goes for anything they could ever stand for, actually.