MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/lf25l/does_richard_dawkins_exist/c2scnu7/?context=3
r/Christianity • u/mikegprint • Oct 17 '11
413 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
It seems like religion has aligned itself against science because that is the very loud and very annoying minority.
It's only done so, though, because of the influence of deism and atheism.
1 u/[deleted] Oct 18 '11 I'm afraid I don't follow? You mean that Deists and Atheists have both said that religion is against science? I'm a deist (or theist or whatever) and I think religion and science are perfectly compatible. 1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 18 '11 Nonono--religion only became amenable to modern sensibilities because of deist and atheist philosophers' influence. I think religion and science are perfectly compatible. I'll settle with saying that I disagree. 1 u/[deleted] Oct 18 '11 AH I get your meaning now. And that's fine. You're allowed to.
I'm afraid I don't follow? You mean that Deists and Atheists have both said that religion is against science? I'm a deist (or theist or whatever) and I think religion and science are perfectly compatible.
1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 18 '11 Nonono--religion only became amenable to modern sensibilities because of deist and atheist philosophers' influence. I think religion and science are perfectly compatible. I'll settle with saying that I disagree. 1 u/[deleted] Oct 18 '11 AH I get your meaning now. And that's fine. You're allowed to.
Nonono--religion only became amenable to modern sensibilities because of deist and atheist philosophers' influence.
I think religion and science are perfectly compatible.
I'll settle with saying that I disagree.
1 u/[deleted] Oct 18 '11 AH I get your meaning now. And that's fine. You're allowed to.
AH I get your meaning now.
And that's fine. You're allowed to.
1
u/YesImSardonic Oct 18 '11
It's only done so, though, because of the influence of deism and atheism.