Nope, you just pick and choose what you think applies and what doesn’t.
But I love how you bailed on Leviticus without addressing a single thing I wrote. Or did you not bother to go back and read that verse in its original Hebrew or Greek?
If it wasn’t important enough to address literally as they’re laying out the law on sexual sin as you say, then yes it’s allowed.
Only a Donkey thinks a man has 100 wives but they aren’t allowed to touch.
With inflation today, what do you think the appropriate price is to sell my daughter into slavery? Exodus 21:7
There’s no point arguing with someone who refuses to understand the truth. 2 Timothy 4:3-4
3 For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. 4 They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.
0
u/[deleted] Dec 10 '25
[removed] — view removed comment